Methodology to Perform a Combined Heating and Power System Feasibility Study for Industrial Manufacturing Facilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.2711Keywords:
CHP systems, CHP feasibility study, emissions reduction, CHP for industrial manufacturing facilitiesAbstract
This article considers combined heating and power (CHP) systems
based on topping cycles, in which electricity is generated by a prime
mover and heat is then recovered from the exhaust and utilized to offset
all or a portion of the facility’s process and/or space heating requirements.
The article presents a methodology to perform a base load CHP system
assessment and feasibility study for industrial manufacturing facilities as
well as to determine emissions reductions that may result from utilization
of such a system. In order to determine the best and most viable option
for the facility in question, the proposed methodology can be used to size
different systems which utilize diverse technologies and fuel sources,
perform an economic analysis of each proposed option, and then compare
the benefits and setbacks of each type of CHP system considered. The
economic analysis will provide a broad insight as to which proposed
system will show the best payback if installed. In addition to the economic
analysis, the proposed methodology can be used to determine the
potential reduction of emissions associated with utilization of the CHP
system. Examples are presented to describe in detail the application of this
methodology.
Downloads
References
Sayane, S. and Shokrollahi, S. “Selection and Sizing of Prime Movers in Combined
Heat and Power Systems.” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 2004, Vienna, Austria,
pp. 613-621.
Zogg, R., Roth, K., and Brodrick, J. “Using CHP Systems in Commercial Buildings.”
ASHRAE Journal, September 2005, pp. 33-36.
Al-Sulaiman, F.A., Hamdullahpur, F. and Dincer, I., Trigeneration: A comprehensive review based on prime movers. International Journal of Energy Research, 2010, doi:
1002/er.1687.
Ghaebi, H., Amidpour, M., Karimkashi, S. and Rezayan, O., Energy, exergy and
thermoeconomic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system
with gas turbine prime mover. International Journal of Energy Research, 2010, doi:
1002/er.1721
Cardona, E., Piacentino, A., and Cardona, F., “Matching economical, energetic and
environmental benefits: An analysis for hybrid CHCP-heat pump systems,” Energy
Conversion and Management, Vol. 47, 2006, pp. 3530-3542.
Mago, P.J., Fumo, N., and Chamra, L.M., “Performance analysis of CCHP and CHP
systems operating following the thermal and electric load,” International Journal of
Energy Research 33, 2009, pp. 852–864.
Mago, P.J., Hueffed, A, and Chamra, L.M., “A review on energy, economical, and
environmental benefits of the use of CHP systems for small commercial buildings
for the North American climate,” International Journal of Energy Research, 2009 33,
, pp. 1252–1265.
Jalalzadeh-Azar, A.A., “A Comparison of Electrical- and Thermal-Load-Following
CHP Systems,” ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 110, 2004.
Hueffed, A.K. and P.J. Mago, “Influence of prime mover size and operational
strategy on the performance of combined cooling, heating, and power systems
under different cost structures,” Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 224, 2010, pp.
-605.
Cho, H., Eksioglu, S., Luck, R., Chamra, L.M., “Operation of Micro-CHP System
using an Optimal Energy Dispatch Algorithm.” ASME Proceedings of Energy
Sustainability 2008, August 10-14, Jacksonville, FL.
X.Q. Kong, R.Z. Wang, X.H. Huang, Energy optimization model for a CCHP system
with available gas turbines, Applied Thermal Engineering 25 (2–3) (2005) 377–391.
Mago, P.J., and Luck, R. “Evaluation of a Base-Loaded Combined Heating and
Power System with Thermal Storage for Different Small Buildings Applications.”
International Journal of Energy Research, Accepted for Publication.
Mago, P.J., Fumo, N., and Chamra, L.M. “Methodology to Perform a Nonconventional Evaluation of Cooling, Heating, and Power Systems,” Journal of Power
and Energy, 2007, 222, pp. 1075-1087.
Möllersten, K., Yan, J., and Moreira, J.R. “Potential market niches for biomass energy
with CO2 capture and storage - Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2
emissions,” Biomass Bioenergy, 2003, 25, 3, pp. 273-285.
Wahlund, B., Yan J., and Westermark, M. “Increasing biomass utilization in energy
systems: A comparative study of CO2 reduction and cost for different bioenergy
processing options,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 2004, 26, 6, pp. 531-544.
Mollersten K., Yan J., and Westermark M. “Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO2
reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills.” Energy,
, 28, 7, pp. 691-710.
Chicco G. and Mancarella P. “Assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions from
cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Part I: Models and indicators.” Energy,
, Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 410-417.
Mancarella P. and Chicco G. “Assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions from
cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Part II: Analysis techniques and application
cases,” Energy, 2008, Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 418-430.
Steam System Assessment Tool (SSAT). US Department of Energy. Available at:
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/software.html
EPA Catalog of CHP technologies, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership, December 2008.
U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Power Profiler
Program. Available at http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/howclean.html

