Energy Sufficiency Kaizen Achieving Zero Energy Cost and Variance with Sufficiency-inclu- sive Private Energy Portfolios

Authors

  • Michael C. Overturf Nadan Energy LLC
  • Wojciech M. Chrosny IEEE Power and Energy Society
  • Richard G. Stine Natural Power Solutions, LLC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.2643

Keywords:

Energy Index, Energy Portfolio, Efficiency, Deming Cycle, Discounted Cash Flow, Distributed Generation, Kaizen, PDCA, Real Op- tions, Reliability, Sufficiency, Variance Analysis, Zero Cost, Zero Vari- ance

Abstract

Mid-sized industrial and commercial firms consume between 300
to 30,000 MWh of electrical and thermal energy per month. Energy man-
agers in these firms seek to minimize costs, both in terms of absolute
expense and the indirect costs of variances from expected quality.
While many business managers negotiate direct utility costs, few
firms have a continuous improvement process that structure cost con-
trol, efficiency improvement, and risk reduction. A complete manage-
ment process requires planning, quantifying and exercising options, and
variance analysis of efficiency and risk measures. The methods to ac-
complish this are not well understood.
We describe how an Energy Index is used in the context of the
Deming cycle with sufficiency-inclusive private energy portfolios, usu-
ally implemented as a microgrid. We discuss valuation, planning tech-
niques, and show how business can institute a process that can be used
to drive both energy cost and variance to zero over time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Michael C. Overturf, Nadan Energy LLC

Michael C. Overturf is the principal founder and developer of Na-
dan Energy’s value proposition. He has a 30-year career spanning Digi-
tal Technology, Manufacturing, Logistics, Management Consulting, and
Mergers and Acquisitions.
Most recently Mike was the Vice President, Strategic Development
of Group 1 Software, acquired by Pitney Bowes in 2004. Prior to this, he
was the Chief Operating Officer for Virginia Arbor, a furniture company
with operations in Massachusetts, China, and Mexico.
Mike spent 15 years advising companies in a wide variety of indus-
tries on productivity issues involving labor, material, energy, and capital
management. He designed and constructed manufacturing facilities for
discrete components production such as graphite-based silicon furnaces,
consumer products, metal industrial products, and various services. As
a Director of Operations for Alexander Proudfoot he engaged in value
engineering and productivity improvement work for nearly 100 compa-
nies in Europe, US, and Southeast Asia. He holds several patents. He can
be reached at mike@nadanenergy.com

Wojciech M. Chrosny, IEEE Power and Energy Society

Wojciech M. Chrosny received BSEE and MSEE equivalent de-
grees from Warsaw Polytechnic Institute in 1980 specializing in Power
Electronics and Control systems. He joined Julie Research Labs in NYC in 1981 and was a chief engineer for automated calibration systems. In
1982 he joined Pitney Bowes Inc and was responsible for development
of communications systems and embedded control systems. He received
MSCS and Ph.D. CS from Polytechnic Institute of New York in 1986 and
2000, respectively.
Dr. Chrosny held number of global engineering management and
product development positions. He is currently partner at Natural Pow-
er Solutions, LLC an engineering consulting firm, specializing in on-site
energy generation system design. He is a member of IEEE Power and
Energy Society. He can be reached at al.chrosny@nps-us.com.

Richard G. Stine, Natural Power Solutions, LLC

Richard G. Stine received his BSEE degree from Bridgeport En-
gineering Institute (now Fairfield University School of Engineering) in
1982. He has over 30 years of experience as quality management profes-
sional. He has been a leader in quality, reliability, failure analysis, com-
petitive intelligence and process improvement.
He is currently partner at Natural Power Solutions, LLC an engi-
neering consulting firm, specializing in on-site energy generation system
design. He can be reached at Rick.Stine@nps-us.com

References

We will refer to Energy Sufficiency as an index term and DG (Distributed Generation)

in terms of technological installation. In some cases they are synonymous.

O can be defined as net or gross receivables value shipped, or standard value earned

units.

Operations theory considers the term ‘demand’ that which is required to produce an

output. In Power Engineering this is called Consumption (kWh); Demand (kW) is the

sum of connected load capacity averaged over a sample period.

It was thought that setup costs would make small batches prohibitively expensive.

Few people considered that setup times could be brought from hours to seconds, ef-

fectively zero, allowing lotsize = 1.

m1, m2 are arbitrary contracts for grid energy (e.g., electricity, district steam); m3 is

a resource contract that fires s1; s1 is a sufficiency system (e.g. Natural gas cogenera-

tion).

Endx is discontinuous, it can be 0 or undefined for Ψ = 0.

E.g., Cuyahoga River, 1969; fish died instantly when exposed to the water of the Hud-

son and lower Rhine River in the 1970s.

See [3] chapter 3.2; a more complex model that adds mean reversion and price jump

models can be reviewed under [4].

Downloads

Published

2011-10-13

How to Cite

Overturf, M. C. ., Chrosny, W. M. ., & Stine, R. G. . (2011). Energy Sufficiency Kaizen Achieving Zero Energy Cost and Variance with Sufficiency-inclu- sive Private Energy Portfolios. Distributed Generation &Amp; Alternative Energy Journal, 26(4), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.2643

Issue

Section

Articles