Carbonate Direct Fuel Cell Operation on Dual Fuel

Authors

  • David Moyer concurrent Technologies Corporation
  • Frank Holcomb ngineer Research and Development Cen- ter, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.2223

Abstract

The ability to operate highly-ef ficient, pollution-free, distributed-
generation power plants on either natural gas or HD-5 grade propane
is of interest to the U.S. Army and the U.S Department of Homeland
Security as secure power source for critical power operations. The abil-
ity to operate continuously on HD-5 propane also provides a valuable
proposition to islands, remote sites, national parks, data centers, military
bases, hotels, and hospitals. HD-5 propane, as opposed to other grades
of propane, was selected as the back-up fuel of choice because of its
availability (even in remote areas), cost, and ease of processing in the
fuel cell power plant. Although natural gas distribution through utility
pipelines is convenient, it is vulnerable to natural disaster, threats of
terrorism, and simple repair outages. Propane, however, is routinely
transported and stored as a liquid at ambient temperatures and offers
a convenient and secure option for fuel cell operations. An adequate
quantity of propane can be stored on site to sustain operations for sev-
eral days in a variety of weather climates.
In response to the interest for a fuel flexible power plant, Concur-
rent Technologies Corporation (CTC), under contract to the U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center’s Construction Engineering
Research Laboratory (ERDC-CERL), is working with FuelCell Energy
(FCE) to test an internally reforming 250 kW carbonate fuel cell. Previous
to the demonstration at CTC, FCE operated a 250 kW carbonate direct
fuel cell for 1500 hours, which generated 300,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh)
net AC electricity using HD-5 propane as fuel. Among the challenges
addressed, lessons learned by FCE during initial operation on HD-5
propane included: 1) avoiding carbon deposition during pre-reforming
of propane into a methane rich gas, 2) metering and controlling propane flow to account for variations in fuel composition, 3) removing sulfur
from the propane, and 4) increasing the steam required for operation
on propane. Peripheral issues that required additional investigation
included identifying the number and volume of propane tanks and a
vaporization system to deliver the required rate and quantity of fuel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

David Moyer, concurrent Technologies Corporation

David Moyer is a senior mechanical engineer with Concurrent
Technologies. He may be contacted at moyerd@ctc.com. Concurrent
Technologies Corporation (CTC) is an independent, nonprofit, applied
research and development professional services organization providing
management and technology-based solutions to a wide array of clients
representing state and federal government as well as the private sec-
tor. CTC operates the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Fuel Cell Test
and Evaluation Center (FCTec). FCTec is a national resource facility for the independent, unbiased testing and validation of fuel cell and fuel
processor systems for both military and commercial applications. The
FCTec’s primary goal is to signi ficantly accelerate the development and
commercialization of fuel cell systems through comprehensive research,
development, test and evaluation, integration, and optimization ser-
vices.

Frank Holcomb, ngineer Research and Development Cen- ter, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory

Frank Holcomb is a principle investigator and fuel cell projects
manager for the fuel cell demonstration program at the U.S. Army, En-
gineer Research and Development Center’s Construction Engineering
Research Laboratory located in Champagne, IL. He may be contacted
at Franklin.H.Holcomb@erdc.usace.army.mil.

References

Fuel Cell Power Systems, Performance Test Codes (ASME PTC 50-2002), The American

Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York, November 29,

Downloads

Published

2007-03-14

How to Cite

Moyer, D. ., & Holcomb, F. . (2007). Carbonate Direct Fuel Cell Operation on Dual Fuel. Distributed Generation &Amp; Alternative Energy Journal, 22(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.2223

Issue

Section

Articles