Do You Have a Packaged Boiler? Modify it to Cogenerate... and Profit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.1649Abstract
Competition from deregulation is driving utilities and consumers
to seek out alternate means to reduce the cost of electricity. The utility
industry is expected to shift generation away from the traditional central
station philosophy to dispersed generation with the formerly wasted
heat to be recovered and used for industrial steam or to heat commercial
buildings. [1] Some experts suggest that the dispersed generation will
take the form of cogeneration by locating thermal electric generators
with heat recovery steam generators alongside the thermal host.
Coincidentally, there are a large number of existing boilers that can
serve as waste heat receivers if properly modified. This could result in
substantial capital savings, further reducing the cost of the dispersed
electrical generation. Repowering cold windbox industrial boilers
complements and reinforces the dispersed generation philosophy.
This article will compare the economic and technical advantages of
repowering existing small industrial boilers with conventional engine/
gas turbine driven generator sets. Operating advantages in steam gen-
eration reliability and flexibility will be presented
Downloads
References
Casten, T.R., “Whither Electric Generation? A Different View,” Cogeneration
and Competitive Power Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, Winter 1996, pages 63-78.
Kuehn, S.E., “Advancing gas turbine technology: evolution and revolu-
tion,” Power Engineering, May 1995, pages 25-28.
Williams, P.L., “The Small Turbine Revolution,” Independent Energy, July-
August, 1995, pages 86-89.
STEAM/its generation and use, 40th edition, Babcock & Wilcox.
Walters, A., “Technical Perspective,” presented at the 1st GRI Repowering
Initiation Workshop, Chicago, May 10, 1995.

