Political and Regulatory Risk—The U.S. Challenge

Authors

  • Michael J. Zimmer Baker & McKenzie Washington, DC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.1547

Abstract

The independent power (IPP) industry faces the highest dimension
of political risk, regulatory uncertainty and market challenges in its brief
dynamic history over the next five years. A number of key market issues
in the U.S. driven by regulatory changes are pending for resolution im-
pacting the long term health and performance of the industry.
Originally, the industry was spawned by the provision of strong
regulatory and tax incentives to promote successful non-utility genera-
tion and development. These initial inducements were overtaken by the
forces of competition and project development through the provision of
regulatory market supports, competitive bidding and least cost planning
at the state level.
Finally, competitive market forces were in control during the past
decade as power matured into more of a commodity industry with price
(through marketing and trading) becoming the critical arbiter of service.
This created the current transitional environment in the U.S. in which
regulatory risk is at the largest level the industry has faced in its brief
history. When converged with the threats of overbuilding and plum-
meting asset valuations, the combination, until 2005, could be deadly.
Frequently, IPP developers have faced regulatory risk and its con-
sequences in the development of international projects during the past
decade. Special forms of political risk insurance coverage and support-
ive government programs have been established to manage the volatil-
ity and uncertainty associated with the political and regulatory dimen-
sion of project development in international markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Michael J. Zimmer, Baker & McKenzie Washington, DC

Michael J. Zimmer is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of
Baker & McKenzie, specializing in U.S. banking, finance and major
projects.
He has represented energy concerns for over 20 years in matters
before the Department of Energy, the FERC, the SEC and Congress. He
has represented domestic and international industrial and manufactur-
ing companies, electric utilities and their unregulated subsidiaries, en-
ergy project developers, natural gas pipeline and distribution compa-
nies, trade associations, financial institutions, universities, and embas-
sies in over 30 states and 15 foreign countries. Since 1977, he has been
an invited witness on various energy and energy tax proposals before
Congressional committees, various federal departments and agencies,
and state commissions and agencies. Mr. Zimmer has been involved in
several mergers, acquisitions and project financings in the IPP industry
including some of the largest undertakings in the United States. He has
also been responsible for major precedents before the FERC involving
issues under the Federal Power Act, PURPA, the Natural Gas Policy Act
and PUHCA.
Mr. Zimmer is a member of the Bars of the District of Columbia
and Virginia. He is a member of the American Bar Association Natural
Resources and Public Utility Law Sections, and the Federal Energy Bar
Association (FEBA).
Baker & McKenzie, 815 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20006-4078; (t) 202-452-7000; (f) 202-452-7074.

Downloads

Published

2000-10-15

How to Cite

Zimmer, M. J. . (2000). Political and Regulatory Risk—The U.S. Challenge. Distributed Generation &Amp; Alternative Energy Journal, 15(4), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.1547

Issue

Section

Articles