Research on Environmental Performance and Measurement of Smart City Power Supply Based on Non Radial Network DEA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.3934Keywords:
Smart city, electricity supply, non-radial, network DEA, environmental efficiency.Abstract
The continuous development of smart cities has put forward higher requirements for the supply of power systems. In response to the constraints in the environmental performance and measurement of smart city power supply, this paper proposes a research model for smart city power supply environmental performance and measurement based on non-radial network DEA based on the characteristics of DEA model and distance function. This model can combine different stages of power supply to conduct more reasonable statistics and analysis of efficiency in different regions. In addition, correlation coefficients were analyzed for the impact of efficiency factors on the phase ratio in the production and sales stages of the power supply system. The research results indicate that there is a positive correlation between the output value and power generation of electricity sales and the efficiency of the electricity sales stage, with correlation coefficients of 0.57 and 0.092, respectively; The length of newly added lines, capacity of new equipment, and line loss rate are all negatively correlated with their efficiency, with correlation coefficients of −0.42, −0.12, and −0.46, respectively. Based on the above analysis, this study provides more theoretical support for the study of environmental performance and measurement of smart city power supply.
Downloads
References
F. R M, Sayed A, Mahaboob S B, et al. Adaptive Parallel Seeker Optimization-based Route Planning for clustered WSN in smart cities[J]. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 102(2):126–139.
Nath K S, Prakash O S, Naman B, et al. An efficient chaos-based image encryption algorithm using real-time object detection for smart city applications[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 53(PB):256–272.
Wang C. Study on the statistical measure of green development in China based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS method[J]. Environment, Resource and Ecology Journal, 2023, 7(5):324–339.
Rong B, Zhang C, Yang S, et al. Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Green Development Progress Level of Private Enterprises in China: Based on Large Collection Surveys[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(15):56–68.
Tommasetti A, Maione G, Bignardi A, et al. Environmental accounting in the public sector: a systematic literature review[J]. International Journal of Business Environment, 2023, 14(2):62–79.
Xu H. Research on Environmental Accounting Information Disclosure of Steel Industry Based on Double Carbon Target[J]. Accounting and Corporate Management, 2022, 4(6):13–26.
Faisal M M, Muhammad M, Shujaat M M. In the Pursuit of Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Environmental Accounting[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(11):239–256.
Nenming W, Guwen T. A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(6):647–659.
Chu J, Wu J, Song M. An SBM-DEA model with parallel computing design for environmental efficiency evaluation in the big data context: a transportation system application[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 270(1–2):515–531.
Chiu S, Yang R, Xiao Z, et al. Applying The Dynamic Network DEA Model to Evaluate The Chinese Regional Sustainable Performance[P]. Management Science and Industrial Engineering, 2020.
Hyok N K, Feng H, Chol O K. Combining common-weights DEA window with the Malmquist index: A case of China’s iron and steel industry[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2023, 87(PB).
Jie W, Yinghao P, Zhixiang Z. Assessing environmental performance with big data: A DEA model with multiple data resources[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 177(6):32–49.
Elvira S, Manuela M. Environmental efficiency, irreversibility and the shadow price of emissions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 306(2):52–67.
Zhongbao Z, Wenting S, Helu X, et al. A non-convex metafrontier DEA model with natural and managerial disposability for pollutant tax levels and environmental efficiencies analysis[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2022, 73(10).
Zuoming L, Changbo Q, Min S, et al. Environmental Performance Evaluation of Key Polluting Industries in China – Taking the Power Industry as an Example[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(12):79–95.
Xizhen G, Xiao H. Study on Environmental Performance Evaluation Model of Coal Mine Using Balanced Scorecard and Ubiquitous Computing[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1952(3): 213–230.
Tao L, Yunfen G, Liqi Y, et al. Environmental Performance Evaluation of New Type Thermal Power Enterprises Considering Carbon Peak and Neutrality[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(7):63–79.
Lee S H, Choi Y. Environmental Performance Evaluation of the Korean Manufacturing Industry Based on Sequential DEA[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(3):89–102.
Zhaokun C, Fenfen L, Xiangyang T. Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of the Xiangjiang River Basin: A DEA Cross-Efficiency Approach With Social Network[J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9.
Liu X, Wang Q. A New DEA Cross-Efficiency Method Based on Consensus[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications, 2022, 10(5):111–126.
Chen K, Liu S, Han Y, et al. Energy efficiency assessment and resource optimization using novel DEA model: evidence from complex chemical processes[J]. Energy Efficiency, 2020, 13(7):36–49.
Wang J, Zhao T. Regional energy-environmental performance and investment strategy for China’s non-ferrous metals industry: a non-radial DEA based analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 163.
Wang Q, Hang Y, Sun L, et al. Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2016, 112.
Djordjević B, Krmac E. Evaluation of Energy-Environment Efficiency of European Transport Sectors: Non-Radial DEA and TOPSIS Approach[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(15):48–62.
Baohui W, Jingjing Q, Xiaohong L. A fresh insight on measuring energy productivity and environmental performance incorporating health[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 326.
Chen W, Zhou K, Yang S. Evaluation of China’s electric energy efficiency under environmental constraints: A DEA cross efficiency model based on game relationship[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164.
Mahmoudabadi Z M, Azar A, Emrouznejad A. A novel multilevel network slacks-based measure with an application in electric utility companies[J]. Energy, 2018, 158(22):156–168.
Roghaee N, Mohammadi E, Varzgani N. Performance evaluation and ranking of electricity companies using fuzzy network data envelopment analysis: a case study of Iranian regional electricity organisations[J]. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2020, 19(4):12–29.
Ming M, Tingting P, Xinxin L. Assessing the total factor productivity of China’s thermal power industry using a network DEA approach with cross-efficiency[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9(12):196–205.
Placido M, Gustavo A N, Lidia M A, et al. Evaluation of Brazilian electricity distributors using a Network DEA model with shared inputs[J]. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2015, 13(7):2209–2216.
