Euclidean Geometry Paradigm for Electrical Safety: A Novel Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.4035Keywords:
arc flash, electrical safety, Euclidean geometry, geometric modeling, hazard mitigation, Hierarchy of Controls, human factors, personal protective equipment (PPE), risk assessment, safety protocols, worker exposureAbstract
This paper introduces a novel geometric paradigm for electrical safety that models hazards and worker exposure as time-dependent vectors. By drawing an analogy with the Euclidean concept of coplanar parallel lines, which never intersect, the framework posits that safety is maintained when the worker’s effective distance (the sum of their actual separation and the protective buffer provided by personal protective equipment, PPE) never crosses the hazardous zone. The model captures the dynamics of hazard expansion, such as arc flashes, alongside the worker’s movement toward the hazard, while incorporating the time-dependent decay of PPE effectiveness. Furthermore, human factors such as fatigue, which affect worker response and movement, are integrated into the model, emphasizing their role in altering safe exposure windows. The geometric framework is also aligned with the Hierarchy of Controls, where elimination of the hazard is viewed as the ideal state, and the other controls are interpreted as vector transformations that maintain safe separation. While the model simplifies the complex phenomena of arc flash events by focusing solely on geometric expansion, it provides a clear baseline for quantitative risk assessment and offers promising directions for enhancing real-world safety protocols.
Downloads
References
29 CFR 1904 Subpart G “Definitions.”
Euclid, “Euclid’s Elements,” Book 1, Definition 23. 300 BCE.
NFPA 70E “Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace,” 2024.
29 CFR Part 1910.147, “The Control of Hazardous Energy.”
29 CFR 1926.28 “Personal Protective Equipment.”
IEEE 1584-2018: “Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations.”
Mohler, B.J., Thompson, W.B., Creem-Regehr, S.H. et al. “Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed.” Exp Brain Res 181, 221–228 (2007).
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
IEEE C37.20.7-2017: “IEEE Guide for Testing Switchgear Rated Up to 52 kV for Internal Arcing Faults.”
Dembe AE, Erickson JB, Delbos RG, Banks SM, “The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the United States.” Occup Environ Med. 2005 Sep; 62(9):588–97.
R. Wilkins, M. Allison and M. Lang: “Effect of Electrode Orientation in Arc Flash Testing,” Mersen, 2005.

