TREND OF SYNTHETIC PARITY PROGRESSION RATIO (SPPR) OF INDIA: EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL FAMILY HEALTH SURVEYS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss2229-5666.12212Keywords:
Birth Order, Parity, SPPR, TFRAbstract
Fertility dynamics have been studied in this paper from 1977 to 2015. Regional fertility changes are analyzed using all four rounds of National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data. Synthetic Parity Progression Ratios (SPPR) and Total fertility rate (based on PPR) are used to analyze the fertility trend. Except for first parity, there is a decline in second and higher order birth of all the six regions. Reduction of third and higher order birth is the main reason for this decline.
Downloads
References
Feeney, G. (1983). Population dynamics based on birth intervals and parity progression, Population Studies, 37(1), p. 75–89.
Feeney, G. and Yu, J. (1987). period parity progression measures of fertility in China, Population Studies, 41(1), p. 77–102.
Henry, L. (1961). Fecondite et famille, Modeles mathematiques (II). Population (French Edition), 16(1), p. 27.
Hinde, A. (1998). Demographic Methods, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York.
International Institute for and Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99. India. Mumbai: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16. India. Mumbai: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS- 3), 2005-06: India: Volume 1. Mumbai, IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (1995). National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), India 1992-93, Bombay:IIPS.
Ni Bhrolchain, M. (1987). Period parity progression ratio and birth intervals in England and Wales, 1941-1971: A Synthetic Life Table Analysis. Population Studies, 41(1), p.103– 125.
Pandey, A., Saxena, N., and Singh, K. K. (1997). Estimation of parity progression ratios from birth order statistics, JSTOR, Vol. 53, No. 1/2 (GENNAIO - GIUGNO 1997), pp. 177-188
Qin, M., Falkingham, J., and Padmadas, S. S. (2018). unpacking the differential impact of family planning policies in China: analysis of parity progression ratios from retrospective birth history data, 1971-2005, Journal of Biosocial Science, 50(6), p. 1–23.
Spoorenberg, T. (2013a). An evaluation of the recent fertility changes in Afghanistan: A parity-specific analysis, Journal of Population Research, 30, p. 133-149.
Spoorenberg, T. (2013b). Fertility Changes in Central Asia since 1980, Asian Population Studies, 9(1), p. 50-57.
Spoorenberg, T. and Dommaraju, P. (2012). Regional fertility transition in india: an analysis using synthetic parity progression ratios, International Journal of Population Research, Volume 2012, Article ID 358409, 20 pages doi:10.1155/2012/358409.
Spoorenberg, Thomas (2010). Fertility transition in India between 1977 and 2004: analysis using parity progression ratios, Population, E, 65(2), p. 313– 331.
Yadava, R. C., Pandey, A. and Saxena, N. C. (1992). Estimation of parity progression ratios from the truncated distribution of closed and open birth intervals, Mathematical Biosciences, 110(2), p. 181–90.
