ROLE OF STATISTICAL VIS-A-VIS PHYSICS-OF- FAILURE METHODS IN RELIABILITY ENGINEERING

Authors

  • P.V. Varde Performance Evaluation & Safety Section Research Reactor Services Division Bhabha Atomic research Centre, Mumbai 400 085 (India)

Keywords:

Random failures, Reliability engineering, Distributions, Failure rate, Failure probability, Root Cause Analysis, Statistics.

Abstract

Traditionally the statistical or more specifically probabilistic methods form the basic framework for assessing the reliability characteristics of the components. However the recent trend for predicting the reliability or life of the component involves application of physics-of- failure methods. This rather new approach is finding wider application as it is based on basic fundamentals of science and thereby provides an improved framework to understand the failure mechanism. Since accelerated testing of component forms part of this approach, the prediction of time-to-failure of the components is more accurate compared to the existing methods which depends only historical data and its evaluation using probabilistic methods. The new approach is all the more relevant when it comes to assessment of reliability of new components as the traditional probabilistic approach is not adequate to predict reliability of new components as it depends on historical data for prediction of reliability.

In view of the above this paper investigates the role of statistical or probabilistic approach and physics-of-failure approach for reliability assessment of engineering components in general and electronics components in particular.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

International Atomic Energy Agency, (1988). Component reliability data for

use in probabilistic safety assessment, IAEA-TECDOC-478, Vienna.

White Mark & Joseph B. Bernstein (2008) “Microelectronics reliability :

Physics-of-Failure based modelling and Lifetime evaluation, Jet Propulsion

Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, JPL

publication.

Dai, Shu-Ho & Wang, Ming-O (1992). Reliability Analysis in Engineering

Applications, Publ. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Edward Stott, Pete Sedcole, P.Y.K. Cheung (2008), “Fault tolerant methods

for reliability in FPGAs”, 978-1-4244-1961-06/08©2008 IEEE.

Pierce, D.G. and Brusius, P.G., (1997). Electromigration: A review,”

Microelectron Reliability, Vol. 37, 1053-1072.

Black, J.R. (1967). Mass transport of aluminium by moment exchange with

conducting electrons, 6th Annual Int. Reliability physics Symposium, 148-159.

O’Connor, P.D.T. and Newton, D. (1995). Practical reliability engineering,

John Wiley & Sons.

Cho, J., and Thompson, C.V., (1989). Grain size dependence of

Electromigration induced failures in narrow interconnects. Applied physics

letter, Vol. 54.

Oates, A.S., (1996). Electromigration failure distribution of contacts and Vias

as a function of stress conditions in submicron IC metallizations. 34th Annual

reliability physics symposium, Dallas,TX.

Hinoda,K., Furusawa,T., and Homma, Y., (1993). “Dependence of

electromigration lifetime on the square of current density. IEEE Int. Reliability

physics symposium.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Carrier_injection, 22/05/(2009)

Downloads

Published

2009-06-01

How to Cite

Varde, P. (2009). ROLE OF STATISTICAL VIS-A-VIS PHYSICS-OF- FAILURE METHODS IN RELIABILITY ENGINEERING. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 2(1), 41–51. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JRSS/article/view/22087

Issue

Section

Articles