Investigating Role of Artificial Intelligence for Preparing Question Paper Till Evaluation Process in Open Book Examination System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1811Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, open book examinations, question paper preparation, evaluation process, feasibilityAbstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of higher education, the integration of AI in various assessment techniques presents before us a revolutionary potential for grading systems. This research study aimed to investigate the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in open-book examinations, with a focus on question paper preparation and evaluation processes. The research employed a Quantitative approach, including surveys and data analysis techniques. The sample size of 165 participants was taken as a sample in the study which includes students, educators and administrators from various academic institutions who have implemented open book examination systems. Participants were chosen on the basis of purposive sampling technique that have vast experience in AI technologies and open book system as well. The findings revealed significant differences and associations between AI integration and traditional methods in open-book examinations. Challenges identified in traditional methods included time constraints and subjectivity in evaluation. The t-test analysis showed significant differences in the feasibility and effectiveness of open-book examinations between AI-integrated and traditional methods. There was a significant association between traditional question paper preparation and evaluation methods and the identified challenges. Additionally, a significant difference was found in the benefits and advantages of using AI technologies in question paper preparation for open book exams. The authors arrived at the resolution that further examination and educator preparation are expected to completely get a handle on the capability of artificial intelligence in instructive assessment, especially schooling level lower than advanced education.
Downloads
References
Cellan-Jones, R. (2014): Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. BBC news, 2(10), 2014. (Report).
Chapelle, C. A., and Chung, Y. R. (2010): The promise of NLP and speech processing technologies in language assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), pp. 301–315.
Chew, E., and Chua, X. N. (2020): Robotic Chinese language tutor: personalising progress assessment and feedback or taking over your job? On the Horizon, 28(3), pp. 113–124.
Dawson, P., Nicola-Richmond, K., and Partridge, H. (2024): Beyond open book versus closed book: a taxonomy of restrictions in online examinations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), pp. 262–274.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019): Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal of information management, 48, pp. 63–71.
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., and Slamene, R. (2023): Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100180. pp. 1–8.
Gálvez, J., Conejo, R., and Guzmán, E. (2013): Statistical techniques to explore the quality of constraints in constraint-based modeling environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 23, pp. 22–49.
Jani, K. H., Jones, K. A., Jones, G. W., Amiel, J., Barron, B., and Elhadad, N. (2020): Machine learning to extract communication and history-taking skills in OSCE transcripts. Medical Education, 54(12), pp. 1159–1170.
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., and Haag, B. B. (1995): Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American journal of distance education, 9(2), pp. 7–26.
Liu, M., Wang, Y., Xu, W., and Liu, L. (2017): Automated scoring of Chinese engineering students’ English essays. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 15(1), pp. 52–68.
Lodhi, P., Mishra, O., Jain, S., and Bajaj, V. (2018). StuA: An intelligent student assistant. IJIMAI, 5(2), pp. 17–25.
Luckin, R; Holmes, W; (2016): Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. UCL Knowledge Lab: London, UK. ISBN: 13-9780992424886. Report.
Mellit, A., and Kalogirou, S. A. (2008): Artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic applications: A review. Progress in energy and combustion science, 34(5), pp. 574–632.
Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., and Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education, 71, pp. 56–76.
Nilson, N. J., “John McCarthy, (2012): A Biographical Memoir,” National Academy of Sciences, 1–27. (Report).
Ocaa-Fernández, Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A., and Garro-Aburto, L. L. (2019): Artificial Intelligence and its Implications in Higher Education. Propós. represent. vol. 7, n. 2, pp. 536–568.
Perez, S., Massey-Allard, J., Butler, D., Ives, J., Bonn, D., Yee, N., and Roll, I. (2017): Identifying productive inquiry in virtual labs using sequence mining. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 18th International Conference, AIED 2017, Wuhan, China, June 28–July 1, 2017, Proceedings 18, pp. 287–298.
Popenici, S. A., and Kerr, S. (2017): Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 12(1), pp. 2–13.
Quille, K., Nolan, K., Becker, B. A., and McHugh, S. (2021): Developing an open-book online exam for final year students. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 pp. 338–344.
Rawlinson, K (2015): Microsoft’s Bill Gates insists AI is a threat. BBC News. Report.
Richardson, M., and Clesham, R. (2021): Rise of the machines? The evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in high stakes assessment. London Review of Education, 19(1), pp. 1–13.
Roberts, L., and Berry, J. (2023): Should open-book, open-web exams replace traditional closed-book exams in STEM? An evaluation of their effectiveness in different disciplines. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (28). pp. 1–39.
Samarakou, M., Fylladitakis, E., Fruh, W. G., Karolidis, D., Hatziapostolou, A., Athinaios, S., and Grigoriadou, M. (2016): Evaluation of an intelligent open learning system for engineering education. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal, 8(3), pp. 496–513.
Santos, O. C., and Boticario, J. G. (2014): Involving users to improve the collaborative logical framework. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1), pp. 1–15.
Saplacan, D., Herstad, J., and Pajalic, Z. (2018): Feedback from digital systems used in higher education: An inquiry into triggered emotions-two universal design oriented solutions for a better user experience. In Transforming our World Through Design, Diversity and Education, pp. 421–430.
Suhaimy, K. A. M., Salleh, B. M., and Esa, A. (2012): The Open Book Examination. Journal of Techno-Social (JTS) Volume 4(2). ISSN: 2229-8940, pp. 1–12.
van den Berg, G., and du Plessis, E. (2023): ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), pp. 998.
Yuwei Li (2024): Procedia Computer Science, ‘The 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics for IoT Security and Privacy”, Vol. 243, pp. 1222–1230.


