Forecasting models for forewarning Soybean Yellow Mosaic Virus for Tarai Zone of Uttarakhand

Authors

  • Yunish Khan Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India
  • Vinod Kumar Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1828

Keywords:

Crop disease severity forecasting, Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression (SMLR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Elastic Net (ELNET)

Abstract

The emergence of soybean diseases represents a formidable obstacle to the sustainable progression of the rapidly evolving soybean industry, which endeavors to achieve elevated productivity and enhanced crop excellence. Prompt and accurate disease prognostication is imperative for efficacious management protocol, as it contributes to limiting pathogen proliferation. This investigation examined the impact of various meteorological factors on the incidence of Soybean Yellow Mosaic Virus (SYMV) in Pantnagar, Uttarakhand. Six multivariate frameworks were assessed, encompassing Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression (SMLR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Elastic Net (ELNET), employing both original climatic parameters and calculated weather indices to predict disease severity. For model construction, 80% of the dataset was allocated for training purposes while the remaining 20% was reserved for validation procedures. Among all examined frameworks, the ANN model incorporating weather indices (ANN-WI) exhibited exceptional predictive performance, attaining a Normalized Mean Square Error (nRMSE) of only 3.08% and an R2 coefficient of 0.99 during the calibration phase. Based on performance metrics, the frameworks were ranked as follows: ANN-WI ≈ ANN-W > ELNET-W > ELNET-WI > SMLR-WI > SMLR-W. The results definitively demonstrate that ANN-based frameworks, especially those incorporating weather indices, significantly exceeded alternative modeling techniques within the investigated area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yunish Khan, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

Yunish Khan is a Teaching Personnel in the Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. He holds a Ph.D. in Agricultural Statistics from the Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. His research focuses on Yield and Disease Severity Forecasting. He has published extensively in reputed journals and serves as a reviewer for several esteemed academic publications. Dr. Khan completed his B.Sc. from VCSGUUHF, Bharsar and M.Sc. from GBPUA&T, Pantnagar. Alongside his academic responsibilities, he remains actively engaged in research, contributing to advancements in his field.

Vinod Kumar, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

Vinod Kumar is an esteemed Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. With a distinguished career in academia, he has also held various administrative positions at the university. His research interests include Applied Statistics, Life Testing, Reliability and Bayesian Inference. He has published numerous research papers in reputed journals and actively contributes as a reviewer for many prestigious publications. Additionally, he serves as an Editor-in-Chief, further demonstrating his dedication to the advancement of statistical research.

References

A REFERENCE GUIDE TO IMPORTANT SOYBEAN FACTS & FIGURES, SOYSTATS (2022). Accessed online: http://soystats.com/wp-content/uploads/Soy-Stats-2022-Web.pdf (Accessed on 20 April 2023).

Bhartiya, A., Chandra, N., Pal, R.S., Aditya, J.P. and Bajeli, J. (2017). Comparative yield gaps, economic impact and constraint analysis in front line demonstrations of soybean and black soybean in Uttarakhand hills. Indian J. Agric. Res., 51(5): 483–487.

Kolte, S. J., Awasthi, R.P., and Vishwanath (1987). Assessment of yield losses due to Alternaria blight in rapeseed and mustard. Ind. Phytopathol., 40, 209–211.

Hartman, G.L., Sinclair, J.B., and Rupe, J.C. (1999). Compendium of soybean diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, 24–25.

Naveesh, Y.B., Prameela, H.A., Basavaraj, S. and Rangaswamy, K.T. (2020). Screening of Soybean Genotypes to Soybean Yellow Mosaic Virus Disease. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(3): 2070–2076, https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.237.

Agrawal, R. and Mehta, S.C. (2007). Weather Based Forecasting of Crop Yields, Pests and Diseases – IASRI Models. J. Ind. Soc. Agril. Stati.ft., 61(2): 255–263.

Domingues, T., Brandao, T. and Ferreira J.C. (2022). Machine Learning for Detection and Prediction of Crop Diseases and Pests: A Comprehensive Survey. Agriculture, 12, 1350, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091350.

Montaseri, M., Zaman Zad Ghavidel, S. and Sanikhani, H. (2018). Water quality variations in different climates of Iran: Toward modeling total dissolved solid using soft computing techniques. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 32: 2253–2273.

Satpathi, A., Setiya, P., Das, B., Nain, A.S., Jha, P.K., Singh, S. and Singh, S. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques for Rice Yield Forecasting for Chhattisgarh, India. Sustainability, 15(3), 2786.

Wheeler, B.E.J. (1969). An introduction to plant diseases. The English Language Book Society and John Wiley and Sons Limited, London, pp 386.

Pandey, H.N., Menon, T.C.M. and Rao, M.V. (1989). A simple formula for calculating area under disease progress curve. Barley Genet. News, 2(1), 38–39.

Das, B., Nair, B., Reddy, V.K. and Venkatesh, P. (2018). Evaluation of multiple linear, neural network and penalised regression models for prediction of rice yield based on weather parameters for west coast of India. Int. J. Biometeorol., 62(10), 1809–1822.

Dahikar, S.S. and Rode, S.V. (2014). Agricultural crop yield prediction using artificial neural network approach. Int. J. Inov. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Control Eng., 2, 683–686.

Kuhn, M. (2008). Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. J. Stat. Softw., 28, 1–26.

Hastie, T., Qian, J. and Tay, K. (2021). An Introduction to glmnet. https:/glmnet.stanford.edu/articles/glmnet.html.

Khan, Y., Kumar, V., Setiya, P. and Satpathi, A. (2023a). Comparison of phenological weather indices based statistical, machine learning and hybrid models for soybean yield forecasting in Uttarakhand. J. Agromet, 25(3), 425–431.

Khan, Y., Kumar, V., Setiya, P. and Satpathi, A. (2023b). Forecasting soybean yield: a comparative study of neural networks, principal component analysis and penalized regression models using weather variables. Theor. Appl. Climatol., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04767-9.

Khan, Y., Kumar, V., Satpathi, A., Setiya, P., Surbhi, K., Nain, A. K., Vishwakarma, D. K., Yradav, K. K., Gacem, A. and Choi, J. R. (2025). Comparative Evaluation of Hybrid and Individual Models for Predicting Soybean Yellow Mosaic Virus Incidence. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99427-5.

Setiya, P., Satpathi, A., Nain, A.S. and Das, B. (2022). Comparison of weather-based wheat yield forecasting models for different districts of Uttarakhand using statistical and machine learning Techniques. J. Agrometeorol., 24(3), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i3.1571.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Khan, Y. ., & Kumar, V. . (2025). Forecasting models for forewarning Soybean Yellow Mosaic Virus for Tarai Zone of Uttarakhand. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 18(02), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1828

Issue

Section

Articles