Non-utility Photovoltaic Deployment: Evaluation of U.S. State-level Policy Drivers

Authors

  • Dr. Gilbert Michaud
  • Dr. Damian Pitt

Abstract

This article examines whether policies to incentivize solar
photovoltaic (PV) systems in the United States are achieving their objec-
tives. We focus on non-utility solar PV, i.e., solar energy systems owned
by homes, businesses, and other institutions besides electric utilities.
Our study compares the impacts of these policy approaches to those of
other non-policy factors such as per capita income, electricity costs, and
the availability of solar energy resources. Using a hierarchical regres-
sion analysis with cross-sectional data from the years 2012-2013, we find
that the most important drivers of non-utility PV deployment are retail
electricity rates and available solar energy resources, followed by the
presence of personal or corporate income tax credits and net metering
policies. These findings indicate a need for stronger net metering poli-
cies, adoption of income tax credits over property or sales tax exemp-
tions, and more aggressive renewable portfolio standards that create a
more effective solar renewable energy credit market

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Gilbert Michaud

Dr. Gilbert Michaud is an adjunct assistant professor at the Voi-
novich School of Leadership and Public Affairs at Ohio University. His
research examines policies to encourage renewable energy investment,
as well as the evaluation of community solar models. Dr. Michaud has
published academic articles in peer-reviewed journals, and technical re-
ports on energy and economics issues for nonprofits and local and state
government entities. Prior to his academic career, Dr. Michaud worked
as the lead researcher for the energy and power segment of U.S. Business
Executive Journal. He holds a Ph.D. in public policy and administration
from Virginia Commonwealth University.

Dr. Damian Pitt

Dr. Damian Pitt is an associate professor at the L. Douglas Wilder
School of Government and Public Affairs at Virginia Commonwealth
University. His research examines opportunities to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions through energy conservation, renewable energy use, land
use, and transportation policies. Dr. Pitt also sits on the board of directors
for the Richmond Region Energy Alliance and the Virginia chapter of the
American Planning Association. Prior to his academic career, he worked
for Cogan Owens Greene in Portland, Oregon. He holds a Ph.D. in plan-
ning, governance and globalization from Virginia Polytechnic University.

References

Krasko, V. and Doris, E. (2013). State distributed PV policies: Can low cost (to

government) policies have a market impact? Energy Policy, 59, pages 172-181.

Shrimali, G. and Kniefel, J. (2011). Are government policies effective in promot-

ing deployment of renewable electricity resources? Energy Policy, 39, pages

,726-4,741.

Carley, S. (2011). The era of state energy policy innovation: A review of policy

instruments. Review of Policy Research, 28(3), pages 265-294.

Kowsari, R. and Zerriffi, H. (2011). Three-dimensional energy profile: a concep -

tual framework for assessing household energy use. Energy Policy, 37, pages

,505-7,517.

Couture, T. and Cory, K., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2009). State

clean energy policies analysis (SCEPA) project: an analysis of renewable energy feed-in

tariffs in the United States. From http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/45551.pdf.

Hurlbut, D., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2008). State clean energy

practices: Renewable portfolio standards. From http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08o-

sti/43512.pdf.

Tobin, R. (1986). New federalism and state implementation of the clean water

act. Environmental Management, 10, pages 785-796.

Byrne, J., Huhges, K., Rickerson, W. and Kurdgelashvili, L. (2007). American

policy conflict in the greenhouse: divergent trends in federal, regional, state,

and local green energy and climate change policy. Energy Policy, 35, pages 4,555-

,573.

Burkett, V. (2011). Global climate change implications for coastal and offshore oil

and gas development. Energy Policy, 39, pages 7,719-7,725.

Ekins, P., Russell, A. and Hargreaves, C. (2002). Reducing carbon emissions

through improved household energy efficiency in the UK. Journal of Environmen-

tal Policy and Planning, 4(1), pages 41-65.

Winter 2019, V ol. 38, No. 3

Knudsen, J. (2010). Integration of environmental concerns in a trans-Atlantic

perspective: the case of renewable electricity. Review of Policy Research, 27(2),

pages 127-146.

Panwar, N., Kaushik, S. and Kothari, S. (2011). Role of renewable energy sources

in environmental protection: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,

, pages 1,513-1,524.

Prasad, M. and Munch, S. (2012). State-level renewable electricity policies and

reductions in carbon emissions. Energy Policy, 45, pages 237-242.

Roosa, S. and Jhaveri, A. (2009). Carbon reduction—policies, strategies and technolo-

gies. The Fairmont Press, Inc.: Lilburn, Georgia.

Lehmann, J. (2007). A handful of carbon. Nature, 447, pages 143-144.

Mann, M. (2009). Do global warming and climate change represent a serious

threat to our welfare and environment? Social Philosophy and Policy, 26(2), pages

-230.

Moretto, J. (2013). A new energy strategy for the United States: energy indepen -

dence. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 33(2), pages 24-75.

Pizer, W., Sanchirico, J. and Batz, M. (2010). Regional patterns of U.S. household

carbon emissions. Climatic Change, 99(1-2), pages 47-63.

Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. and Toke, D. (2015, Febru -

ary 17). Rescaling the governance of renewable energy: lessons from the UK

devolution experience. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19(1-2), pages

-502.

Vachon, S. and Menz, F. (2006). The role of social, political, and economic inter -

ests in promoting state green electricity policies. Environmental Science and Policy,

, pages 652-662.

Stoutenborough, J. and Beverlin, M. (2008). Encouraging pollution-free energy:

the diffusion of state net metering policies. Social Science Quarterly, 89, pages

,230-1,251.

Randolph, J. and Masters, G. (2008). Energy for sustainability: Technology, planning,

policy (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

U.S. Department of Energy (2011). Solar powering your community: a guide for local

governments. From icma.org/Documents/Document/Document/302295.

Interstate Renewable Energy Council and The Vote Solar Initiative (2013). Free-

ing the grid: best practices in state net metering policies and interconnection procedures.

From http://freeingthegrid.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/FTG_2013.pdf.

Inskeep, B., Kennerly, J. and Proudlove, A. North Carolina Clean Energy Tech-

nology Center. (2015). The 50 states of solar: a quarterly look at America’s fast-evolv-

ing distributed solar policy and regulatory conversation. From http://nccleantech.

ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/The-50-States-of-Solar_FINAL.pdf.

Darghouth, N., Barbose, G. and Wiser, R. (2011). The impact of rate design and

net metering on the bill savings from distributed PV for residential customers in

California. Energy Policy, 39, pages 5,243-5,253.

Interstate Renewable Energy Council (2009). Net metering model rules. From

http://irecusa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ConnectDocs/IREC_NM_Model_

October_2009-1.pdf.

Cai, D., Adlakha, S., Low, S., De Martini, P. and Chandy, K. (2013). Impact of

residential PV adoption on retail electricity prices. Energy Policy, 62, pages 830-

Hughes, L. and Bell, J. (2006). Compensating customer-generators: a taxonomy

describing methods of compensating customer-generators for electricity sup-

plied to the grid. Energy Policy, 34, pages 1,532-1,539.

Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment

Menz, F. (2005). Green electricity policies in the United States: case study. Energy

Policy, 33, pages 2,398-2,410.

Yi, H. and Feiock, R. (2012). Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state

renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 29(2), pages 193-206.

National Conference of State Legislatures (2016). State renewable portfolio stan-

dards and goals. From http://www.ncsl.org/research/energy/renewable-portfo-

lio-standards.aspx.

Office of the Attorney General of Virginia (2012). Report of the Office of the Attor-

ney General on return-on-equity enhancement adders of the 2007 Virginia Electric Util-

ity Regulation Act. From http://services.dlas.virginia.gov/User_db/frmView.

aspx?ViewId=3369&s=

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2014). Renewable portfolio standards.

From http://www.nrel.gov/tech_deployment/state_local_governments/ba-

sics_portfolio_standards.html.

Plumer, B. (2013. August 8). State renewable-energy laws turn out to be incred -

ibly hard to repeal. The Washington Post. From http://www.washingtonpost.

com/news/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/08/state-renewable-energy-laws-turn-out-

to-be-really-hard-to-repeal.

Light, J. (2015). Score one for ALEC: West Virginia is first state to repeal a renewable

energy standard. From http://grist.org/news/score-one-for-alec-west-virginia-is-

first-state-to-repeal-a-renewable-energy-standard.

Warrick, J. (2015, March 7). Utilities wage campaign against rooftop solar.

The Washington Post. From http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/

health-science/utilities-sensing-threat-put-squeeze-on-booming-solar-roof-

industry/2015/03/07/2d916f88-c1c9-11e4-ad5c-3b8ce89f1b89_story.html.

Shapiro, C. (2011, November 24). Dominion to charge fee to heavy users of solar

power. The Virginian-Pilot. From http://hamptonroads.com/2011/11/dominion-

charge-fee-heavy-users-solar-power.

Kennerly, J., Wright, K., Laurent, C., Rickerson, W. and Proudlove, A., North

Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (2014). Rethinking standby and fixed

cost charges: regulatory and rate design pathways to deeper solar PV cost reductions.

From http://nccleantech.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/Rethinking-Standby-

and-Fixed-Cost-Charges_FINAL-1.pdf.

North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (2014). Standby and fixed-cost

charges and net-metering energy debates. From http://nccleantech.ncsu.edu/wp-

content/uploads/State-Status-of-NEM-Standby-+-Fixed-Cost-Charge-Debates_

V2.pdf.

Turkel, T. (2014, March 11). CMP wants Mainers who generate their own

power to pay more. Portland Press Herald. From http://www.pressherald.

com/2014/03/11/cmp_wants_maine_self-generators_who_feed_grid_using_so-

lar__wind_to_pay_more_/.

Sarzynski, A., Larrieu, J. and Shrimali, G. (2012). The impact of state financial

incentives on market deployment of solar technology. Energy Policy, 46, pages

-557.

Ciocirlan, C. (2008). Analysing preferences towards economic incentives in com-

batting climate change: a comparative analysis of U.S. states. Climate Policy, 8,

pages 548-568.

Sinclair, M. (2008). Mainstreaming solar PV in the USA. Renewable Energy Focus,

(5), pages 64-70.

Burns, J. and Kang, J. (2012). Comparative economic analysis of supporting poli -

cies for residential solar PV in the United States: solar renewable energy credit

Winter 2019, V ol. 38, No. 3

(SREC) potential. Energy Policy, 44, pages 217-225.

Bird, L., Heeter, J. and Kreycik, C., National Renewable Energy Laboratory

(2011). Solar renewable energy certificate (SREC) markets: status and trends. From

http://apps3.eere.energy.gov/greenpower/pdfs/52868.pdf.

Doris, E., and Gelman, R., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2011). State of

the states 2010: the role of policy in clean energy market transformation. From http://

www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49193.pdf.

Li, H. and Yi, H. (2014). Multilevel governance and deployment of solar PV pan -

els in U.S. cities. Energy Policy, 69, pages 19-27.

Wiser, R., Barbose, G. and Holt, E. (2011). Supporting solar power in renewables

portfolio standards: experience from the United States. Energy Policy, 39, pages

,894-3,905.

Yin, H. and Powers, N. (2010). Do state renewable portfolio standards promote

in-state renewable energy generation? Energy Policy, 38(2), pages 1,140-1,149.

Bush, B., Doris, E. and Getman, D., National Renewable Energy Laboratory

(2014). Understanding the complexities of subnational incentives in supporting a na-

tional market for distributed photovoltaics. From http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14o-

sti/62238.pdf.

Crago, C. and Chernyakhovskiy, I. (2014). Residential solar photovoltaic technol -

ogy adoption: an empirical investigation of state policy effectiveness, presented

at the International Association for Energy Economics 37th International Con-

ference, New York, New York, June, 2014. From http://www.usaee.org/us-

aee2014/submissions/OnlineProceedings/Crago and Chernyakhovskiy USAEE

re-submitted.pdf.

Gouchoe, S., Everette, V. and Haynes, R., National Renewable Energy Labora -

tory (2002). Case studies on the effectiveness of state financial incentives for renewable

energy. From http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/32819.pdf.

Shrimali, G. and Jenner, S. (2013). The impact of state policy on deployment

and cost of solar photovoltaic technology in the U.S.: a sector-specific empirical

analysis. Renewable Energy, 60, pages 679-690.

Yang, C. (2010). Reconsidering solar grid parity. Energy Policy, 38, 3,270-3,273.

Zhao, T., Bell, L., Horner, M., Sulik, J. and Zhang, J. (2012). Consumer responses

towards home energy financial incentives: a survey-based study. Energy Policy,

, pages 291-297.

Hasnain, S., Alawaji, S. and Elani, U. (1998). Solar energy education—a viable

pathway for sustainable development. Renewable Energy, 14(1-4), pages 387-392.

Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environ -

mentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environ-

mental Psychology, 23(1), pages 21-32.

Doris, E., McLaren, J., Healey, V. and Hockett, S., National Renewable Energy

Laboratory. (2009). State of the states 2009: renewable energy development and the role

of policy. From www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/46667.pdf.

Matisoff, D. and Edwards, J. (2014). Kindred spirits or intergovernmental com -

petition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states

(1990-2008). Environmental Politics, 23(5), pages 795-817.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. and Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/

correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Law-

rence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Sherwood, L., Interstate Renewable Energy Council (2013). U.S. solar market

trends: 2012. From http://www.irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/

Solar-Report-Final-July-2013-1.pdf.

Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment

Sherwood, L., Interstate Renewable Energy Council (2014). U.S. solar market

trends: 2013. From http://www.irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/

Final-Solar-Report-7-3-14-W-2-8.pdf.

Kwan, C. (2012). Influence of local environmental, social, economic and politi -

cal variables on the spatial distribution of residential solar PV arrays across the

United States. Energy Policy, 47, pages 332-344.

Steward, D., Doris, E., Krasko, V. and Hillman, D., National Renewable Energy

Laboratory (2014). The effectiveness of state-level policies on solar market development

in different state contexts. From http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/61029.pdf.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (2013). State personal income 2012. From http://bea.

gov/newsreleases/regional/spi/2013/spi0313.htm.

Carley, S. (2009a). Distributed generation: an empirical analysis of primary moti -

vators. Energy Policy, 37, pages 1,648-1,659.

Barbose, S., Weaver, S. and Darghouth, N., Lawrence Berkeley National Labo -

ratory (2014). Tracking the sun VII: an historical summary of the installed price of

photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2013. From http://eetd.lbl.gov/

newsletter/nl41/eetd-nl41-5-trackingsun.html.

Carley, S. (2009b). State renewable energy electricity policies: an empirical evalu -

ation of effectiveness. Energy Policy, 37, pages 3,071-3,081.

Steward, D. and Doris, E., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2014). The ef-

fect of state policy suites on the development of solar markets. From http://www.nrel.

gov/docs/fy15osti/62506.pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-01-17

How to Cite

Michaud, D. G. ., & Pitt, D. D. . (2023). Non-utility Photovoltaic Deployment: Evaluation of U.S. State-level Policy Drivers . Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 38(3), 52–80. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/SPEE/article/view/19503

Issue

Section

Articles