Using Building Size to Optimize Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Incentives

Authors

  • Anastasia M. Roy LEED AP
  • Rachel L. Seraspe PE
  • Tejas Desai PE, LEED AP

Abstract

Electric utilities and government agencies across the U.S. offer
financial incentives and subsidies to help end users offset the cost of
energy efficiency measures (EEMs) installed in their facilities. These de-
mand-side management programs are designed to reduce overall ener-
gy use to decrease strain on the grid, increase resiliency, meet regulatory
requirements, and save money for both the utility and their customers.
However, many utilities do not tailor their incentive programs to serve
the needs of different building sizes. This occurs despite their custom-
ers’ varying energy profiles, economic and staffing resources, appetite
for specific technologies, and overall organizational goals. The EEMs
and savings potential for small buildings have less complicated build-
ing systems and generally fewer resources for energy upgrades. They
are not the same as those for large buildings with more complex energy
systems and dedicated building engineering staff. Our study reviews
common utility energy efficiency incentive structures and analyzes the
lighting and cooling equipment in small, medium and large commercial
buildings. It proposes that optimizing incentives for building size can
help utility policy-makers increase the enrollment, cost effectiveness
and overall energy savings of their energy efficiency programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anastasia M. Roy, LEED AP

Anastasia M. Roy, LEED AP, is a program manager at WES and brings eight years of consulting experience in the fields of environmental assessment and energy efficiency. Anastasia holds a B.A. from Kalamazoo College and an M.P.A. from Columbia University. Email: aroy@willdan.com; Tel: (646) 599-2483.

Rachel L. Seraspe, PE

Rachel Seraspe, PE, is a program manager at WES. She has previously conducted ASHRAE Level I, II and III energy audits of hospitals, commercial, institutional and residential facilities. Rachel holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Boston University and an M.B.A. from Drexel University. She is a licensed professional engineer. Email: rseraspe@willdan.com; Tel: (646) 604-4498.

Tejas Desai, PE, LEED AP

Tejas Desai, PE, LEED AP, CEM, CEA, CDSM, is an engineering manager at WES and has 12 years of experience in energy efficiency and engineering. Tejas holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Maharaja Sayajirao University and a Masters of Mechanical Engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago. Email: tdesai@willdan. com; Tel: (646) 357-6340.

References

U.S. Energy Information Administration (September, 2011). Annual Energy Re-

view 2011. Available at: http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/sec2.

pdf. Accessed: 7/1/2015.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (December, 2008). Overview of Commer-

cial Buildings, 2003. Available at: http://www.eia.gov/consumption/commer-

cial/data/archive/cbecs/cbecs2003/overview1.html. Accessed: 7/1/2015.

Molina, M. (March, 2014). The Best Value for America’s Energy Dollar: A National

Review of the Cost of Utility Energy Efficiency Programs. American Council for

an Energy-Efficient Economy. Report Number U1402. Available at: http://aceee.

org/node/3078?id=5189. Accessed: 7/1/2015.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (December, 2008). 2003 Commercial

Buildings Energy Consumption Survey: Energy End-Use Consumption Tables:

Table E5A. Electricity Consumption (kWh) by End Use for All Buildings, 2003.

Available at: http://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/archive/

cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set19/2003pdf/e05a.pdf. Accessed:

/1/2015.

Dietz, T. (September, 2010). Narrowing the U.S. Energy Efficiency Gap. Pro -

ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer-

ica. Vol. 107. No. 37: 16007-16008 Available at: http://www.pnas.org/con-

tent/107/37/16007.full.pdf. Accessed: 7/1/2015

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

Roy, A. M. ., Seraspe, R. L. ., & Desai, T. . (2023). Using Building Size to Optimize Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Incentives. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 36(1), 18–31. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/SPEE/article/view/19625

Issue

Section

Articles