Fair Dynamic Pricing for Advanced Metering Infrastructure

Authors

  • Daniel J. Rozell

Abstract

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), a subset of smart grid
technologies, improves information exchange between electric utility
operators and consumers. AMI allows for real-time dynamic pricing
where the utility operator can charge variable prices depending on load
demand and the varying cost of delivering electricity. While many stud-
ies have shown that dynamic pricing improves system efficiency and
reduces costs for most consumers, there is much less discussion of the
relative fairness of various dynamic pricing structures some of which
have the potential to be regressive compared to traditional flat-rate pric-
ing. This is considered unfair by ratepayer advocates and fairness issues
often arise in discussions of dynamic pricing at state level public utility
commissions. While a tradeoff between efficiency and equity exists, this
author argues that only minor compromises are necessary if the right
dynamic pricing options are used. Forms of dynamic pricing that guar-
antee no increased costs for any individual consumer are less likely to
be labeled as unfair. If utilities offer default dynamic pricing structures
that are universally perceived as fair, AMI will face one less hurdle to
widespread acceptance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniel J. Rozell

Daniel J. Rozell, P.E., is a consultant with more than ten years experience in public safety, energy and environmental systems. He is also currently a doctoral student in the Department of Technology & Society at Stony Brook University. His email address is daniel.rozell@ stonybrook.edu.

References

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), a subset of smart grid

technologies, improves information exchange between electric utility

operators and consumers. AMI allows for real-time dynamic pricing

where the utility operator can charge variable prices depending on load

demand and the varying cost of delivering electricity. While many stud-

ies have shown that dynamic pricing improves system efficiency and

reduces costs for most consumers, there is much less discussion of the

relative fairness of various dynamic pricing structures some of which

have the potential to be regressive compared to traditional flat-rate pric-

ing. This is considered unfair by ratepayer advocates and fairness issues

often arise in discussions of dynamic pricing at state level public utility

commissions. While a tradeoff between efficiency and equity exists, this

author argues that only minor compromises are necessary if the right

dynamic pricing options are used. Forms of dynamic pricing that guar-

antee no increased costs for any individual consumer are less likely to

be labeled as unfair. If utilities offer default dynamic pricing structures

that are universally perceived as fair, AMI will face one less hurdle to

widespread acceptance.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-28

How to Cite

Rozell, D. J. . (2023). Fair Dynamic Pricing for Advanced Metering Infrastructure. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 34(2), 26–38. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/SPEE/article/view/19719

Issue

Section

Articles