Carbon Policy Impact on Industrial Facilities
Abstract
Concerns over climate change in the U.S. are prompting actions
at the federal, state and corporate levels that will affect how indus-
trial facilities operate now and in the future. Because a comprehensive
federal carbon policy is still in its infancy, some states are implement-
ing their own carbon policies and setting their own reduction targets
ahead of federal regulations. For example, California’s climate change
mitigation plan requires a reduction of 80 million metric tons of Co2
equivalent (MMTCo2 eq), or a 16% reduction, from the state’s pro-
jected 2020 business-as-usual emissions. A significant share of the re-
quired reduction will come from a cap-and-trade program, a program
that directly affects industrial operation in the state.
This article discusses the impact of federal and state policies on
the operation of industrial facilities. It addresses the three primary
steps that industrial facilities are currently taking to address or pre-
pare for carbon policies: monitoring and reporting of greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions, managing GHG emissions, and preparing for
participation in cap-and-trade programs. The article begins with an
analysis of the industrial sector’s contribution to total U.S. GHG emis-
sions in the last 20 years. This is then followed by an overview of fed-
eral and state climate policies affecting industrial operations. Recent
regulations on mandatory GHG emission reporting and permitting at
the federal level are discussed. The comprehensive statewide cap-and-
trade program in California is also described, as it will greatly affect
industrial operation in the state. Finally, the article concludes with ex-
amples of GHG strategies and actions taken by industrial subsectors
and individual companies to better position themselves for carbon
policies at home and abroad.
Downloads
References
i. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, DRAFT INVENTORY OF U.S. GREEN-
HOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS: 1990-2010, February 11, 2013. Available for
download at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-
GHG-Inventory-2011.pdf
ii. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Appendix I - Quantified
economy-wide emissions targets for 2020, http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_
dec_2009/items/5264.php
iii. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, DRAFT INVENTORY OF U.S. GREEN-
HOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS: 1990-2010, February 11, 2013. Available for
download at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-
GHG-Inventory-2011.pdf
iv. Ibid.
v. Ibid.
vi. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Act Permitting for Greenhouse Gases:
Guidance and Technical Information FACT SHEET. Available for download at http://
www.epa.gov/nsr/ghgdocs/ghgpermittingtoolsfs.pdf
vii. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, Mandatory Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases, 40 CFR 98, October 30, 2009. Available for download at http://
www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/documents/pdf/2009/GHG-MRR-FinalRule.pdf
viii. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, GHGRP 2011: Reported Data. Accessed at
http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/ghgdata/reported
ix. Ibid.
x. Ibid
xi. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, FLIGHT. Accessed at http://ghgdata.epa.
gov/ghgp/main.do
xii. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, FACT SHEET: Final Rule - Prevention of Sig-
nificant Deterioration and Title V Operating Permit Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Tailoring Rule
Step 3 and GHG Plantwide Applicability Limits, July 2, 2012. Available for download at
http://www.epa.gov/nsr/documents/20120702fs.pdf
xiii. Ibid.
xiv. Bloomberg News, EPA Greenhouse-Gas Rules Upheld by U.S. Appeals Court, June 26,
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-26/epa-greenhouse-gas-rules-
upheld-by-u-s-appeals-court.html
xv. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power
Plants, http://epa.gov/carbonpollutionstandard/
xvi. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets. Updated
Summer 2014, Vol. 34, No. 1
March 1, 2013. Accessed at http://www.c2es.org/us-states-regions/policy-maps/
emissions-targets
xvii. California Air Resources Board, Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional
Equivalent Document, June 13, 2011. Available for download at http://www.arb.
ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/final_supplement_to_sp_fed.pdf
xviii. California Air Resources Board, Climate Change Scoping Plan, December 2008. Avail-
able for download at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/scoping-
plandocument.htm
xix. California Air Resources Board, Determining Rule Applicability for California’s 2010
Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Requirements, March 5, 2012. Available for
download at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/reporting/ghg-rep/guidance/ghg_appli-
cability.pdf
xx. California Air Resources Board, 2011 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data Reporting and
Verification, January 11, 2013. Available for download at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/
reporting/ghg-rep/reported_data/2011_ghg_emissions_summary_revised.pdf
xxi. California Air Resources Board, 2011 GHG Facility and Entity Emissions Detailed
Spreadsheet, January 11, 2013. Available for download at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/
reporting/ghg-rep/reported_data/2011_ghg_emissions_spreadsheet.xlsx
xxii. Ibid.
xxiii. Ibid.
xxiv. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, STATUS OF
SCOPING PLAN RECOMMENDED MEASURES, 2011. Available for download at
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/status_of_scoping_plan_measures.pdf
xxv. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Supplement to the
AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document, June 2011. Available for down-
load at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/Supplement_to_SP_
FED.pdf
xxvi. Legislative Analyst’s Office, Cap-and-Trade Market Issues, June 29, 2011. Available for
download at http://www.lao.ca.gov/handouts/resources/2011/Cap_and_Trade_
Market_Issues_062911.pdf
xxvii. Mac Taylor, Evaluating the Policy Trade-Offs in ARB’s Cap-and-Trade Program, Legisla-
tive Analyst’s Office, February 9, 2012. Available for download at http://www.lao.
ca.gov/reports/2012/rsrc/cap-and-trade/cap-and-trade-020912.pdf
xxviii. Mac Taylor, The 2012-2013 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues, Legislative Ana-
lyst’s Office, February 16, 2012. Available for download at http://www.lao.ca.gov/
analysis/2012/resources/cap-and-trade-auction-revenues-021612.pdf
xxix. California Air Resources Board, Auction Information, March 18, 2013. Accessed at
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auction/auction.htm
xxx. Ibid.
xxxi. U.S. Government, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of
the Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives, Competiveness
and Climate Policy: Avoiding Leakage of Jobs and Emissions, March 18, 2009. Available
for download at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg67814/pdf/
CHRG-111hhrg67814.pdf
xxxii. Mac Taylor, The 2012-2013 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues, Legislative Ana-
lyst’s Office, February 16, 2012. Available for download at http://www.lao.ca.gov/
analysis/2012/resources/cap-and-trade-auction-revenues-021612.pdf
xxxiii. Interfaith Center Corporate Responsibility, 2013 Shareholder Resolutions/Environmen-
tal Performance by Sector, http://www.iccr.org/shareholder/trucost/index.php,
xxxiv. Ibid.
xxxv. Ibid.
xxxvi. EnerNoC, 2012 EnerNoC Customer Survey of 634 industrial customers, 2012.
xxxvii. Deloitte, CFO insights: Sustainability: developing key performance indicators, 2009.
Available for download at http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/
Local%20Assets/Documents/us_cfo_kpis%20for%20sustainability_Nov202009.pdf
xxxviii. Deloitte Development, LLC, Lifecycle Assessment: Where is in on your sustainability
Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment
agenda?, 2009. Available for download at http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-
UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_es_LifecycleAssessment.pdf
xxxix. Carbon Disclosure Project, Investor CDP, https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Pro-
grammes/Pages/CDP-Investors.aspx
xl. Ibid.
xli. Ceres, Corporate Governance and Climate Change: Making the Connection, March 2006.
xlii. Ibid.
xliii. Carbon Disclosure Project, CDP Global 500 Report 2011, Sector Analysis: Materi-
als. Available for download at https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Results/
Documents/2011-G500-sector-analysis-materials.pdf
xliv. International Council of Chemical Associations, Innovations for Greenhouse Gas
Reductions: A lifecycle quantification of carbon abatement solutions enabled by the chemi-
cal industry, July 2009. Available for download at http://www.icca-chem.org/IC-
CADocs/ICCA_A4_LR.pdf
xlv. Ceres, Corporate Governance and Climate Change: Making the Connection, March 2006.
xlvi. Carbon Disclosure Project, CDP Global 500 Report 2011, Sector Analysis: Consumer
Staples. Available for download at https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Results/
Documents/2011-G500-sector-analysis-consumer-staples.pdf
xlvii. Carbon Disclosure Project, CDP Supply Chain Report 2012, A New Era: Supplier Man-
agement in the Low-Carbon Economy, 2012. Available for download at https://www.
cdproject.net/CDPResults/CDP-Supply-Chain-Report-2012.pdf
xlviii. US Department of Energy, SaveENERGYNow, Energy Assessments: What are the Ben-
efits to Small and Medium Facilities?, webcast presented by Bill Prymak on November
, 2008. Available for download https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/
pdfs/webcast_2009-0219_small_medium_assessment_benefits.pdf
xlix. E3: Economy, Environment, & Energy, http://www.e3.gov/
l. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Lean, Energy & Climate Toolkit. Available for
download at http://www.epa.gov/lean/environment/toolkits/energy/resources/
lean-energy-climate-toolkit.pdf
li. Arzbaecher, C. et al, MEPs as an Energy Efficiency Channel, Industrial Energy Tech-
nology Conference, May 29-June 1, 2012. Available for download at http://ietc.
tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/2012Presentations.pdf
lii. Ibid.