Campus Energy Cost Savings Case Studies: Applications of Energy Best Practices
Abstract
Global businesses continue to experience regular and significant
cost increases in energy costs. Most companies have established energy
and environmental sustainability commitments/policies which address
decreasing energy emissions and indirectly lower costs. At Armstrong,
a corporate goal was established in 2008 to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions 10% from 2006 baselines by the year 2015.
In 2009, Armstrong completed a greenhouse gas inventory third-
party verification from the established 2006 baseline year through 2008.
Our partnership with The Climate Registry assisted in ensuring mea-
surement accuracy. While the corporation had already surpassed the
2015 reduction goals, the achievement was largely a result of a de-
crease in manufacturing production tied to the overall downturn of
the economy. The company continues to be committed to projects that
decrease energy usage and our environmental impact.
Downloads
References
Energy Star web site:www.energystar.gov
U.S. Green Building Council, LEED-EB Green Building Rating System, Version 2.0,
July 2005, www.usgbc.org
Copper Development Association (CDA) web site: www.copper.org/
Sidebottom, Ken, 2006, “ENERGY STAR Rating System & LEED EB,” Strategic
Planning for Energy and the Environment, Vol. 26, No 1.
Eberly, David A., 2008, “LEED EB® Case Study: Achieving Platinum and the Energy
Star® Label for Corporate Headquarters,” Energy Engineering, Vol. 105, No 3.
Armstrong World Industries corporate web site: www.armstrong.com/, Sustainability
pages and corporate goals.