Re-/Retro-commissioning: The Best Kept Secret You Can’t Afford Not to Know
Abstract
Re- or retro-commissioning, the process of ensuring that an exist-
ing building’s performance continues to meet or exceed its design over
time, is increasingly the target of government policy and the beneficiary
of market forces. New federal, state, and local mandates, in conjunc-
tion with voluntary, market-based standards, are poised to transform
the marketplace. Having begun as an overlooked tool to ensure that
commercial building owners get their money’s worth from design and
construction professionals, commissioning is now known to be the most
cost effective measure available for reducing energy use, lowering costs,
and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in buildings. A recent meta-
analysis by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that re-/
retro-commissioning yields a median 16% energy savings with a payback
time of 1.1 years for a cash-on-cash return of 91%. Economy-wide, the
service has the potential to save building owners and operators more
than $30 billion a year in energy costs by 2030 [1]. Voluntary, market-
driven programs such as LEED®, Building EQ, and ENERGY STAR have
emerged in recent years and encompass the process of existing building
commissioning to varying degrees. Their rapidly growing popularity
widens awareness and implementation of re-/retro-commissioning.
Further, these standards are increasingly incorporated into state and
local policy. Most recently, local governments in New York City and San
Francisco have mandated re-/retro-commissioning in commercial build-
ing codes. These initiatives are the latest evidence of a trend towards
making commissioning a business-as-usual activity in the maintenance
and operation of buildings. As a result of recent market trends, as well
as government policy aimed at capturing the benefits of commission-
Downloads
References
Mills, Evans; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, “A Golden Opportunity for
Reducing Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions”; July 2009
Portland Energy Conservation Inc. (PECI); National Conference on Building Com-
missioning; “History of Commissioning”; 2010
ASHRAE; “The Commissioning Process 0-2005”; March 2005
PECI; “A Retro-commissioning Guide for Building Owners”; 2007
Schwarzenegger, Arnold; Governor of the State of California
The New York City Council, Int.0967-2009; “Article 308: Energy Audits and Retro-
Commissioning Ordinance”; December 2009
San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association; 2010