Developing a Business Case Using Whole Building Performance Measurement

Authors

  • Kim M. Fowler Senior Research Engineer Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory

Abstract

Since 1998, the U.S. Navy’s Naval Facilities Engineering Command
(NAVFAC) has had a policy for incorporating sustainable design prin-
ciples into new building construction. The policy states it is the intent
of NAVFAC to accomplish this within the given budget constraints and
while meeting customer requirements. Programming a building using
a first cost approach instead of a life cycle cost approach is one of the
biggest challenges for integrating sustainable design into Navy projects.
Due to this hurdle, an attempt to develop a Navy-specific business case
was undertaken. Through this process, it was discovered that consistent
data were not being collected for all applicable Navy buildings. There-
fore, the current business case information being used by the Navy is
the conglomeration of existing business case analysis in the literature.
Although this business case information is useful, there is still a need
for collecting and analyzing the Navy business case. To develop the
Navy-specific business case, NAVFAC is developing program metrics
to capture the status of buildings in the design and construction phase,
and started to collect whole building cost and performance data for 14
buildings (7 sustainably designed and 7 traditionally designed build-
ings) to capture data on the existing inventory of sustainably designed
buildings. Performance measurement data are being collected on water,
energy, operations and maintenance, waste generation, purchasing, oc-
cupant satisfaction, and transportation. The building cost and perfor-
mance data will be collected for a minimum of 12 months. Both of these
data collection and analysis efforts have offered lessons learned that will
be shared alongside the current Navy business case information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kim M. Fowler, Senior Research Engineer Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory

Kim M. Fowler (kim.fowler@pnl.gov) is a senior research engineer at the Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory, specializing in sustainable design/development and pollution prevention. Ms. Fowler holds a Master’s degree in environmental engineering and a Bachelor’s degree in political science with a minor in business administration. She is a U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design accredited professional. She has co-authored two books, two book chapters, and numerous journal articles and reports. She is also an adjunct faculty member at Washington State University in the Environmental Science and Engineering Departments.

References

Building Design and Construction (BD&C), editors. 2003. White Paper on

Sustainability: A Report on the Green Building Movement. Building Design and

Construction (Supplement).

Carmona Andreu, Isabel and Tadj Oreszczyn. 2004. Architects Need Feedback

on Environmental Performance. Jul-Aug 2004, Vol. 32 (4). Building Research and

Information.

ENSAR Group. 2003. Sustainable Federal Facilities Task 2.1 Business Case.

November 2002 workshop notes. Boulder, CO.

USGBC. 2006. U.S. Green Building Council. http://www.usgbc.org/.

Memorandum of Understanding. January 2006. Federal Leadership in High

Performance and Sustainable Buildings Memorandum of Understanding. http://

Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment

www.wbdg.org/pdfs/sustainable_mou.pdf.

Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). July 2005. Public Law 109-58.

U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). 2003. The Business Case for Sustainable

Design in Federal Facilities. Interagency Sustainability Working Group, Federal

Energy Management Program, Washington, D.C.

Matthiessen, LF. 2004. Examining the Cost of Green. Greenbuild 2004 International

Conference and Expo Proceedings, Portland, Oregon. http://www.dladamson.

com/Attachment%20Files/Research/The%20full%20report.pdf.

General Services Administration. 2004. GSA LEEDTM Cost Study. http://www.

wbdg.org/.

Kats, G, L Alevantis, A Berman, E Mills, and J Perlman. 2003. The Costs and

Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California’s Sustainable

Building Task Force. Prepared by Capital E, Department of Health Services, and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for California’s Sustainable Building

Task Force, Sacramento, California. http://www.cap-e.com/ewebeditpro/items/

O59F3259.pdf.

Paladino & Company, Inc. 2003. City of Seattle 2002 LEED Evaluation Report.

Prepared for The City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington.

Morton, Steven. 2002. “Business Case for Green Design.” Building Operating

Management, November 2002 Issue. http://www.facilitiesnet.com/bom/article.

asp?id=1481.

Romm, Joseph and William D. Browning. 1994, 1998. Greening the Building and

the Bottom Line. Rocky Mountain Institute.

Fowler, K.M., A.E. Solana, and K. Spees. 2005. Building Cost and Performance

Metrics: Data Collection Protocol, Revision 1.0. PNNL-SA-15217. Pacific

Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Downloads

Published

2023-07-11

How to Cite

Fowler, K. M. . (2023). Developing a Business Case Using Whole Building Performance Measurement. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 27(2), 7–24. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/SPEE/article/view/20011

Issue

Section

Articles