Developing a Business Case Using Whole Building Performance Measurement
Abstract
Since 1998, the U.S. Navy’s Naval Facilities Engineering Command
(NAVFAC) has had a policy for incorporating sustainable design prin-
ciples into new building construction. The policy states it is the intent
of NAVFAC to accomplish this within the given budget constraints and
while meeting customer requirements. Programming a building using
a first cost approach instead of a life cycle cost approach is one of the
biggest challenges for integrating sustainable design into Navy projects.
Due to this hurdle, an attempt to develop a Navy-specific business case
was undertaken. Through this process, it was discovered that consistent
data were not being collected for all applicable Navy buildings. There-
fore, the current business case information being used by the Navy is
the conglomeration of existing business case analysis in the literature.
Although this business case information is useful, there is still a need
for collecting and analyzing the Navy business case. To develop the
Navy-specific business case, NAVFAC is developing program metrics
to capture the status of buildings in the design and construction phase,
and started to collect whole building cost and performance data for 14
buildings (7 sustainably designed and 7 traditionally designed build-
ings) to capture data on the existing inventory of sustainably designed
buildings. Performance measurement data are being collected on water,
energy, operations and maintenance, waste generation, purchasing, oc-
cupant satisfaction, and transportation. The building cost and perfor-
mance data will be collected for a minimum of 12 months. Both of these
data collection and analysis efforts have offered lessons learned that will
be shared alongside the current Navy business case information.
Downloads
References
Building Design and Construction (BD&C), editors. 2003. White Paper on
Sustainability: A Report on the Green Building Movement. Building Design and
Construction (Supplement).
Carmona Andreu, Isabel and Tadj Oreszczyn. 2004. Architects Need Feedback
on Environmental Performance. Jul-Aug 2004, Vol. 32 (4). Building Research and
Information.
ENSAR Group. 2003. Sustainable Federal Facilities Task 2.1 Business Case.
November 2002 workshop notes. Boulder, CO.
USGBC. 2006. U.S. Green Building Council. http://www.usgbc.org/.
Memorandum of Understanding. January 2006. Federal Leadership in High
Performance and Sustainable Buildings Memorandum of Understanding. http://
Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment
www.wbdg.org/pdfs/sustainable_mou.pdf.
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). July 2005. Public Law 109-58.
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). 2003. The Business Case for Sustainable
Design in Federal Facilities. Interagency Sustainability Working Group, Federal
Energy Management Program, Washington, D.C.
Matthiessen, LF. 2004. Examining the Cost of Green. Greenbuild 2004 International
Conference and Expo Proceedings, Portland, Oregon. http://www.dladamson.
com/Attachment%20Files/Research/The%20full%20report.pdf.
General Services Administration. 2004. GSA LEEDTM Cost Study. http://www.
wbdg.org/.
Kats, G, L Alevantis, A Berman, E Mills, and J Perlman. 2003. The Costs and
Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California’s Sustainable
Building Task Force. Prepared by Capital E, Department of Health Services, and
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for California’s Sustainable Building
Task Force, Sacramento, California. http://www.cap-e.com/ewebeditpro/items/
O59F3259.pdf.
Paladino & Company, Inc. 2003. City of Seattle 2002 LEED Evaluation Report.
Prepared for The City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington.
Morton, Steven. 2002. “Business Case for Green Design.” Building Operating
Management, November 2002 Issue. http://www.facilitiesnet.com/bom/article.
asp?id=1481.
Romm, Joseph and William D. Browning. 1994, 1998. Greening the Building and
the Bottom Line. Rocky Mountain Institute.
Fowler, K.M., A.E. Solana, and K. Spees. 2005. Building Cost and Performance
Metrics: Data Collection Protocol, Revision 1.0. PNNL-SA-15217. Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington