Defending the SPR: A Response to the Cato Institute essay “The Case Against the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.”

Authors

  • Bruce Beaubouef Houston, Texas

Abstract

The Cato Institute article “The Case Against the Strategic Petro-
leum Reserve,” authored by Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren, argues
that the government should terminate the program, and sell all the oil.
Unfortunately, their argumentation and evidence is often flawed and
sometimes erroneous; and their conclusion, coming as it does in era of
increasing energy insecurity, could not be more misplaced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bruce Beaubouef, Houston, Texas

Bruce Beaubouef received his Ph.D. in history from the University of Houston in 1997, and his dissertation on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve program has been accepted for publication by Texas A&M University Press. He can be reached at brucebeaubouef@ev1.net.

References

Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren, “The Case Against the Strategic Petroleum

Reserve,” Policy Analysis (No. 555, November 21, 2005).

Timothy J. Considine and Kevin M Dowd, “A Superfluous Petroleum Reserve?”

Regulation 28, No. 2 (Summer 2005); U.S. Congress, Energy Policy and Conservation

Act of 1975 (hereafter cited as EPCA), PL 94-163, Statutes At Large, Vol. 89, December

, 1975, Sec. 161(a), 3(8).

U.S. Congress, “Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments of 1990 (EPCA

Amendments)” [PL 101-383], Statutes at Large: 1990, Vol. 104, Part 1, September 15,

(Washington, D.C: GPO, 1991); U.S. Congress, “Energy Policy Act of 1992” [PL

-486], Statutes at Large: 1992, Vol. 106, Part 4, October 24, 1992 (Washington, D.C.:

GPO, 1993), 106 Stat. 2994, Sec. 1401(B) and (C).

M.A. Adelman, The World Petroleum Market (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University

Press, 1972), p. 260.

David Greene and Paul Leiby, “The Social Cost to the U.S. of Monopolization of

the World Oil Market, 1972–1991,” ORNL-6744, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,

March 1993; David Greene, Donald Jones, and Paul Leiby, “The Outlook for U.S. Oil

Dependence,” ORNL-6873, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, May 11, 1995; David

Greene and Nataliya Tishchishyna, “Costs of Oil Dependence: A 2000 Update,” Oak

Ridge National Laboratory, May 2000. Taylor and Peter Van Doren convert the Oak

Ridge cost estimates to 2005 dollars, see their notes 59-61, p. 19.

In July 2006, the DOE placed the SPR’s total cost at $22 billion ($5 billion for facilities;

$17 billion for crude oil), http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/spr/spr-

facts.html.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-11

How to Cite

Beaubouef, B. . (2023). Defending the SPR: A Response to the Cato Institute essay “The Case Against the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.” . Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 26(3), 66–80. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/SPEE/article/view/20057

Issue

Section

Articles