Leveraging Knowledge: Transferring Energy Services To New Markets
Abstract
In newly competitive energy markets long-term customer commit-
ments will be sought and gained from value-added energy services. The
concept of selling energy services rather than a regulated commodity is
part of an emergent “sustainable development” paradigm which re-
quires transformation of corporate and consumer cultures. Information
systems and knowledge management will be central to transferring new
energy services concepts and capabilities. Global energy companies will
accelerate change as they create collaborations which deploy their infor-
mation through technology-based knowledge management systems.
Downloads
References
An economic analysis of this issue is provided by Duchin and Lange
The Future of the Environment Oxford Press 1994 using an input-output
world model. Under their assumptions about the rate and extent of ef-
ficiency change in various sectors, the CO 2 abatement goals of the Rio/
Kyoto Conventions will not be met.
Such improvements in technology are subsumed by economists under
“technical progress” as opposed to increased inputs of labor and/or capi-
tal. “Knowledge” has an ambiguous status in the traditional (Cobb-
Douglas) production function. The human capital school (see especially
by G. Becker) treat knowledge as an attribute of human capital as it is
trained and educated. Others categorize it as an element of “the residual”
which accounts for growth over and above what can be accounted for
by labor and capital inputs.
Economic efficiency will encompass energy efficiency insofar as energy
is fully priced (i.e., without subsidy) and even more so if taxed to ac-
count for externalities.
Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment
For a recent summary see Scott, M., Parker, G. and Currie, J. “How to
Build Markets for Energy-Efficient Technologies” Strategic Planning
for Energy and the Environment v. 18 no. 4 1999
Recent technical economics has begun to treat knowledge creation, fo-
cusing on the R&D process. See the literature on endogenous growth
such as P. Romer or M. Scott. There has been less economic attention
to the spread and use of existing knowledge, such as we are primarily
discussing in this article. Japan’s astounding growth and that of other
East Asian “tigers” are probably suggestive here. Their skill has been in
adopting and commercializing technologies not creating them. See also
the discussion of R&D by C.I. Jones Introduction to Economic Growth
This is recognized in the idea of “joint implementation” of CO2 emis-
sions abatement where a developed country uses its capital to buy a
more cost-effective abatement project in a developing country.
A. Streicher “The Future of the Global Power Industry” Hagler-Bailly
Perspectives v. 1 issue 3, 1998
Laudis and Graedel “Manufacturing” in D. Richards and G. Pearson,
The Ecology of Industry National Academy Press 1998
Re-visioning and re-inventing are a widely discussed theme in popular
social science of the 1990’s. Perhaps the best known and most accessible
development of this theme for business is G. Hamel and C.K. Prahalad,
Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press 1994
See C. Flavin and N. Lenssen, “Reshaping the Power Industry” in L.
Brown et al, State of the World 1994, Worldwatch Institute/Norton 1994
for a fuller discussion of utility industry events and trends since the
’s and the shift towards an energy services model. The de-regula-
tion of an industry typically leads to a phase of commoditization and
pure price competition as new entrants attack previously protected play-
ers. For this reason it appeared that utility deregulation would lead to
market dominance by lowest cost sources, particularly coal, wheeled
regionally. Initially utilities “stripped down” inessentials such as man-
dated energy service programs, to gird themselves for price wars. But
this phase was short, perhaps because of short-term supply constraints
(it takes about 10 years to site, permit, and build a new coal plant) and
the large number of existing players (not everyone can be a cost-leader).
Instead, the majors have begun competing on the basis of “value-
added.” See, for example, “The Billion-Dollar Battle” Energy Manager,
v. 2 no. 1 January 1999. Also see E. Smeloff and P. Asmus Reinventing
Spring 2001—Vol. 20, No. 4 77
Utilities: Competition, Citizen Action, and Clean Power, Island Press
for case studies of utilities adopting integrated resource responses
to deregulation.
See Bartlett and Ghoshal, Managing Across Borders, Harvard Business
School Press 1989
The most accessible treatment is C. Shapiro and H. Varian, Information
Rules: a Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Harvard Business
School Press 1999
Rogers, E., Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press 1995 (4111 edition)
https://aeeeuropeenergy.com/
