Rating the Sustainable Energy Problems in Manufacturing Businesses and Selecting the Best Energy Security Policy: The Case of Samsun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-4236.4025Keywords:
Energy, energy supply security, renewable energy, sustainabilityAbstract
Today, economic development and development are extremely important. With the increasing need for energy in both the world and Turkish economy, the importance of ensuring the sustainability of the energy resources used and the security of energy supply is also increasing. Implementation of a sustainable energy system; It includes important factors such as efficient energy use together with sufficient, economical, safe and environmentally compatible energy supply. Energy is one of the main factors to consider in discussions of sustainable development. The main dimensions of sustainability in energy production are environmental protection and the economically and socially sustainable supply of energy resources in a way that is reliable, sufficient and financially accessible in the long run. For this reason, it is important for Turkey to identify sustainable energy problems and determine the right energy policy. In this study, the determination of sustainable energy problems and the problems of determining the right energy security policy in manufacturing enterprises in Samsun province in Turkey were made with multi-criteria decision making methods. As a result of this research, the most ideal energy security policy was “Resource Sharing” in the selection created by using the degrees of sustainable energy related problems in manufacturing enterprises. On the other hand, the most ideal energy security alternatives were realized as Resource Sharing (A4)>> Source Distribution (A3)>> Resource Diversification (A1)>> Price Security (A2), respectively.
Downloads
References
Abdo, H. (2011). UK Energy Security: Challenges, Threats and Solutions,
Energy Science and Technology, 1(2), 38–53.
Balaban, G. (2007). EU Energy Security Behavior: Exploring The Cen-
tral Motivation, Unpublished Master Thesis. Bilkent ̈Universitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstit ̈us ̈u: Ankara.
Rating the Sustainable Energy Problems in Manufacturing Businesses 189
Barton, B., Redgwell, C., Ronne, A. and Zilmann, N.D. (2004). Energy
Security, Managing Risk in a Dynamic Legal and Regulatory Environment,
Oxford University Press.
Brodny, J. and Tutak, M. (2021). Assessing sustainable energy development
in the central and eastern European countries and analyzing its diversity.
Science of The Total Environment, 801, 149745.
Chang, Y. F., Watada, J. and Ishii, H. (2012). A fuzzy MCDM approach
to building a model of high performance project team a case study.
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control,
, 7393–7404.
Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualizing Energy Security And Making Explicit ̇Its
Polysemic Nature, Energy Policy Journal, 38, 887–895.
Conard, B. (2013). Some challenges to sustainability. Sustainability, 5(8),
–3381.
Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland, R. and Norgard, R. (1997).
An Introduction to Ecological Economics. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: St.
Lucie Press,
Deese, A. D. (1979–1980). Energy: Economics, Politics, and Security, Inter-
national Security, 4(3), 140–153.
Dokuzlar, B. (2006). D ̈unya G ̈uc ̧ Dengesinde Yeni Silah Do ̆galgaz (Orta
Asya’dan Avrupa’ya), IQ K ̈ult ̈ur Sanat Yayıncılık, ̇Istanbul.
Doukas, H., Patlitzianas, K.D. and Psarras, J. (2006). Supporting sustainable
electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM. Resources Policy, 31(2),
–136.
Elkind, J. (2010). Energy Security: Call for a Broader Agenda, Energy
Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications, Ed.: Carlos
Pascual, and Jonathan Elkind, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.
Genco, F. and Genco, G. (2021). Selection of energy matrix sources in Chile
using a fuzzy logic decision approach. Energy Systems, 12(2), 411–429.
Ho, Y. F., Chang, C. C., Wei, C. C. and Wang, H. L. (2014). Multi-
objective programming model for energy conservation and renewable
energy structure of a low carbon campus. Energy and Buildings, 80,
–468.
Katrancı, A. and Kundakcı, N. (2020). SWARA Temelli Bulanık COPRAS
Y ̈ontemi ile So ̆guk Hava Deposu Sec ̧imi. Optimum Ekonomi ve Y ̈onetim
Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (1), 63–80.
Klare, T. M. (2005). Kaynak Savas ̧ları, Devin Yayıncılık.
Korucuk, S. (2021). Ordu ve Giresun ̇Illerinde Kentsel Lojistik Performans
Unsurlarına Y ̈onelik Kars ̧ılas ̧tırmalı Bir Analiz, Dicle ̈Universitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstit ̈us ̈u Dergisi, 13 (26), 141–155.
C ̧ . Karamas ̧a
Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Bierkens, M. F. P., Lutz, A. F. and Immerzeel, W.
W. (2017). Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on
Asia’s glaciers. Nature, 549(7671), 257.
Mahlia, T. M. I., Saktisahdan, T. J., Jannifar, A., Hasan, M. H. and Matseelar,
H. S. C. (2014). A review of available methods and development on energy
storage; technology update. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
, 532–545.
Monteiro, L., Machado, N., Martins, E., Pougy, N., Verdi, M., Martinelli, G.
and Loyola, R. (2018). Conservation priorities for the threatened flora of
mountaintop grasslands in Brazil. Flora, 238, 234–243.
M ̈uller, M., Viernstein, L., Truong, C. N., Eiting, A., Hesse, H. C., Witzmann,
R. and Jossen, A. (2017). Evaluation of grid-level adaptability for sta-
tionary battery energy storage system applications in Europe. Journal of
Energy Storage, 9, 1–11.
Oberschmidt, J., Geldermann, J., Ludwig, J. and Schmehl, M. (2010).
Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies.
International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 4(2), 183–212.
Pala, C. (2000). Kafkasya Boru Hattı Oyununda Yeni Perde:Rusya Ve ̇Iran’ın
Muhtemel Tepkileri ̈Uzerine Bir Deneme, ̇Is ̧letme Finans Dergisi,
Parmaksız, M.T. (2020). Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının S ̈urd ̈ur ̈ulebilir-
liklerinin ̈Onceliklendirmesi: C ̧ oklu Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklas ̧ımı,
Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Hacettepe ̈Universitesi C ̧ evre M ̈uhendisli ̆gi
B ̈ol ̈um ̈u, Ankara.
Parra, D., Swierczynski, M., Stroe, D. I., Norman, S. A., Abdon, A., Worl-
itschek, J. and Patel, M. K. (2017). An interdisciplinary review of energy
storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 730–749.
Perc ̧in, S. (2019). An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD Approach For
Outsourcing Provider Selection. Journal Of Manufacturing Technology
Management, 30 (2), 531–552.
ˇStreimikien ̇e, D., ˇSliogerien ̇e, J. and Turskis, Z. (2016). Multi-criteria analysis
of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania. Renewable Energy, 85,
–156.
Subramanian, N., (2007), Sustainability-Challenges and solutions. IndIan
ConCreTe Journal, 81(12), 39.
S ̧ eng ̈ul, D. and Cagıl, G. (2020). Bulanık SWARA ve Bulanık Anali-
tik Hiyerars ̧i Prosesi Y ̈ontemi ile ̇Is ̧ De ̆gerlemesi. Dicle ̈Universitesi
M ̈uhendislik Fak ̈ultesi M ̈uhendislik Dergisi, 11(3), 965–976.
Rating the Sustainable Energy Problems in Manufacturing Businesses 191
S ̧ eng ̈ul, D., Cagıl, G. and Ardalı, Z. (2021). Bulanık SWARA ve Aralık
De ̆gerli Sezgisel Bulanık AHP Y ̈ontemi ile ̇Is ̧ De ̆gerlemesi. Y ̈onetim ve
Ekonomi Dergisi, 28 (2), 243–263.
Toklu, M.C., Bozkurt, ̇I. and Sekmen, B. (2020). Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık
WASPAS Yaklas ̧ımı ile Kaizen ̈Oneri Sistemi De ̆gerlendirme Modeli,
Academic Platform – Journal of Engineering and Science, 8(1), 128–138.
Tutulmaz, O. (2011). Ekonomi – C ̧ evre ̇Ilis ̧kisi ve S ̈urd ̈ur ̈ulebilir Kalkınma:
Ampirik Bir De ̆gerlendirme, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Hacettepe
̈Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstit ̈us ̈u Ankara.
U ̆gurlu, ̈O. (2006). T ̈urkiye’de C ̧ evresel G ̈uvenlik Ba ̆glamında S ̈urd ̈ur ̈ulebilir
Enerji Politikalar, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Ankara ̈Universitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstit ̈us ̈u Sosyal C ̧ evre Bilimler, Ankara.
Yazdani, M., Alidoosti, A. and Zavadskas, E. K. (2011). Risk analysis of criti-
cal infrastructures using fuzzy COPRAS. Economic Research-Ekonomska
̇Istraˇzivanja, 24(4), 27–40.
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. and Zakarevicius, A. (2012).
Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Elektron.
ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6), 3–6.
Zolfani, S. H. and Saparauskas, J. (2013). New Application of SWARA
Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy
System. Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408–414