Analysis and Prediction of Factors Influencing Carbon Emissions of Energy Consumption Under Climate Change

Authors

  • Kunyue Zhang College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory for Agricultural Land Quality Monitoring and Control of Ministry of Natural and Resources, Beijing 100193, China
  • Mingru Tao College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory for Agricultural Land Quality Monitoring and Control of Ministry of Natural and Resources, Beijing 100193, China
  • Jinmin Hao College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory for Agricultural Land Quality Monitoring and Control of Ministry of Natural and Resources, Beijing 100193, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4314

Keywords:

climate change, energy consumption, carbon emissions, STIRPAT model, stress model

Abstract

Climate change is one of the major challenges currently facing the world. The factors influencing the carbon emission of energy consumption and the future trend are important guidance for proposing scientific carbon reduction strategies to mitigate climate change. In this paper, the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) model and stochastic impacts by regression population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model are established to analyze and predict the carbon emission of energy consumption. The LMDI model is used to factorize the CO2 changes generated by residential domestic energy consumption, and to decompose and analyze the carbon emission factors of residential domestic energy consumption in terms of energy carbon emission intensity, energy consumption structure, energy consumption intensity, economic development, and population to determine the driving factors leading to carbon emission changes; based on the above study, we set up nine different development scenarios and applied the scalable stochastic environmental impact assessment model to project energy carbon emissions in 2035; based on carbon emission prediction and analysis, the CO2 emissions of total energy consumption, total electricity consumption, industrial energy consumption and terminal energy consumption were selected, and the correlation coefficients with relevant climate indicators such as temperature change and humidity change were analyzed, and the stress model of energy consumption on climate change was constructed. The results show that: the correlation coefficients of energy consumption indicators and temperature change indicators all pass the significance test at P = 0.01 level, among which the correlation coefficients with temperature difference are the highest, all of them are greater than 0.9 and pass the significance test at P = 0.001 level; among the indicators of energy consumption, the correlation coefficient between total industrial energy consumption and temperature difference was slightly higher than that of total energy consumption and electricity consumption; the stress relationship between the increase of energy consumption and the temperature difference is consistent with the growth of the third polynomial curve.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kunyue Zhang, College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory for Agricultural Land Quality Monitoring and Control of Ministry of Natural and Resources, Beijing 100193, China

Kunyue Zhang received her Bachelor’s degree in Land Resource Management from China Agricultural University in 2017. Now she is studying for a master’s degree in Land Resource Management at China Agricultural University. Research areas and directions include territorial spatial planning, geographic information systems and environmental impact assessment.

Mingru Tao, College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory for Agricultural Land Quality Monitoring and Control of Ministry of Natural and Resources, Beijing 100193, China

Mingru Tao received his bachelor’s degree in Land Resource Management from China Agricultural University in 2017 and is now studying for a master’s degree in land Resource Management at China Agricultural University. Research fields and directions include territorial space planning, protection of cultivated land resources and food safety.

Jinmin Hao, College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory for Agricultural Land Quality Monitoring and Control of Ministry of Natural and Resources, Beijing 100193, China

Jinmin Hao (1960–), male, born in Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, Doctor, professor. Her research interest covers territorial spatial planning, land evaluation, soil improvement and utilization, Regional governance and sustainable development.

References

Le Quéré C, Takahashi T, Buitenhuis E T, et al. Impact of climate change and variability on the global oceanic sink of CO2

[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2010, 24(4).

Breecker D O, Sharp Z D, McFadden L D. Atmospheric CO2

concentrations during ancient greenhouse climates were similar to those predicted for AD 2100[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010, 107(2): 576–580.

Zhu Changzheng, Yang Sha, Liu Pengbo, et al. Carbon peak time prediction in China’s transportation industry[J]. Transportation Systems Engineering and Information, 2022, 22(6): 291.

Kang H, Gao J, Hui G. Laboratory Evaluation of CO2

Flooding: A Strategic Technology for Sustainable Development of Oil Companies[J]. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 2023: 21–36.

Qu JF, Chu CHL, Ju MT, et al. Decomposition of carbon emission drivers of residential energy consumption–Tianjin city as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 2017, 33(4): 38–42.

Guo Y, Zhao M. Research on sustainable energy development from the perspective of focusing on carbon peaking and neutrality[J]. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 2022: 345–362.

Xie Di, Tian Yinglin, Wang Guangqian, et al. Research on carbon neutral pathways in Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of Applied Basic and Engineering Sciences, 2022.

Sebos I, Progiou A G, Kallinikos L. Methodological framework for the quantification of GHG emission reductions from climate change mitigation actions[J]. Strategic planning for energy and the environment, 2020: 219–242.

Yang P, Liang X, Drohan P J. Using Kaya and LMDI models to analyze carbon emissions from the energy consumption in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27: 26495–26501.

Ang B W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method?[J]. Energy policy, 2004, 32(9): 1131–1139.

Chen Junhua, Li Qiaochu. Study on the factors influencing carbon emissions of energy consumption in Sichuan Province in the context of the construction of Chengdu-Chongqing twin-city economic circle–based on LMDI model perspective [J].

Kim H S, Noulèkoun F, Noh N J, et al. Future Projection of CO2

Absorption and N2O Emissions of the South Korean Forests under Climate Change Scenarios: Toward Net-Zero CO2

Emissions by 2050 and Beyond[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(7): 1076.

Fu B, Gasser T, Li B, et al. Short-lived climate forcers have long-term climate impacts via the carbon–climate feedback[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10(9): 851–855.

Friedlingstein P, Bopp L, Ciais P, et al. Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, 28(8): 1543–1546.

Dahlmann K, Grewe V, Matthes S, et al. Climate assessment of single flights: Deduction of route specific equivalent CO2

emissions[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2023, 17(1): 29–40.

Bae J H. Impacts of income inequality on CO2

emission under different climate change mitigation policies[J]. Korean Econ Rev, 2018, 34(2): 187–211.

Ehrlich P, Holdren J. Impact of population growth[J]. Population, resources, and the environment, 1972, 3: 365–377.

Dietz T, Rosa E A. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology[J]. Human ecology review, 1994, 1(2): 277–300.

Pan Yue, Zhu Jiye, Ye Yi’an. Analysis of carbon emission impact drivers in Jiangsu Province based on STIRPAT model[J]. Environmental Pollution and Prevention, 2014, 36(12): 104–109.

Huang Rui, Wang Zheng, Ding Guanqun, et al. Analysis and trend prediction of carbon emissions from energy consumption in Jiangsu Province based on STIRPAT model[J]. Geography Research, 2016, 35(4): 781–789.

Martin Calvo M, Prentice I C. Effects of fire and CO 2 on biogeography and primary production in glacial and modern climates[J]. New Phytologist, 2015, 208(3): 987–994.

JI Xing-Quan, ZHAO Guo-Hang, YU Yi-Xiao, et al. Carbon emission factor decomposition and peak prediction method based on 4E balance[J]. High Voltage Technology, 2022.

Torvanger A, Grimstad A A, Lindeberg E, et al. Quality of geological CO2

storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets[J]. Climatic change, 2012, 114: 245–260.

Roy T, Bopp L, Gehlen M, et al. Regional impacts of climate change and atmospheric CO2

on future ocean carbon uptake: A multimodel linear feedback analysis[J]. Journal of Climate, 2011, 24(9): 2300–2318.

Wang Yuan, Zhao Li-Man, Yu Xia, et al. Evaluation of carbon emission changes of energy consumption and local climate change stress in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Fudan: Natural Sciences Edition, 2015 (4): 439–448.

Yao Y, Li G, Lu Y, et al. Modelling the impact of climate change and tillage practices on soil CO2

emissions from dry farmland in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2023, 478: 110276.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-24

How to Cite

Zhang, K. ., Tao, M. ., & Hao, J. . (2023). Analysis and Prediction of Factors Influencing Carbon Emissions of Energy Consumption Under Climate Change. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 43(01), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4314

Issue

Section

New Technologies and Strategies for Sustainable Development