Intelligent Energy System and Power Metering Optimization Based on the Energy Plan Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.43310Keywords:
Energy Plan, Energy structure, Energy and environmental benefits, NSGA-II, electric power measurementAbstract
With the national carbon neutrality and carbon peaking policies proposed one after another, this paper proposes intelligent Energy system design and power metering based on the Energy Plan model. In this paper, the Energy PLAN model is proposed as the basic model for energy development planning during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, and the simulation calculation is carried out for the energy system in 2020. The research shows that there is a large gap between the peak and valley of power load, the peak time of power supply and demand does not match, and the response-ability of the energy supply department is poor. Thus, the problems to be solved in the development of energy are determined. In addition, the accuracy of the model is further verified by comparing the actual data with the simulation results of Energy PLAN, and the direction of energy structure reform is determined. By coupling the NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms-II) algorithm with the development model, a dual-objective multi-time scale scheduling model is established, which aims at the minimum operating cost and the best energy and environmental benefit coefficient. Secondly, the proposed model is solved using the NSGA-II algorithm. In order to ensure the diversity of solutions and promote the Pareto front approach to the ideal Pareto front, the fuzzy dominance method is used to perform a fast non-dominated sorting of the population, and the maximum satisfaction method is used to select the Pareto optimal compromise solution. Example analysis shows that when the power demand level is L*-L*-L*, the power input under “H-M”, “M-L” and “H-L” scenarios is 106.02 × 103, 102.73 × 103 and 94.2 × 103 GWh, respectively. However, when the power demand level is H*-L*-L*, the power input is always 142.64 × 103 GWh. With the decrease in the transmission rate, the measurement data obtained by the user’s electric acquisition platform becomes less and less, and the performance of state estimation becomes worse. When λ=50%, the proposed model still maintains a high estimation accuracy.
Downloads
References
Pohekar S D, Ramachandran M. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – A review[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2004, 8(4): 365–381.
Hiremath R B, Shikha S, Ravindranath N H. Decentralized energy planning; modeling and application – a review[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2007, 11(5): 729–752.
Yu Yang, Chen Dongyang, Wu Yuwei, et al. Battery energy storage Group Control Strategy for Reducing life loss in wind Power tracking Scheduling [J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment/Dianli Zidonghua Shebei, 2023, 43(3).
Lu Quan, Zhang Jiawei, Zhang Na, et al. Coupling balance analysis model of the provincial electric-thermal integrated energy system with multiple flexible resources [J]. Automation of Power Systems, 2022.
Li Chenxi, Liu Pei, Li Zheng. Urban energy system carbon reaches peak path optimization [J]. Journal of Tsinghua university (natural science edition), 2022 on conversion (4): 810–818. The DOI: 10.16511/j. carolcarrollnkiQHDXXB.2022.25.013.
Xu Yan, Zhang Jianhao, Zhang Hui. Case study on location and capacity planning of Park integrated energy System containing cold, heat, electricity and gas [J]. Journal of Solar Energy, 2022, 43(1): 313.
Cheng Jifeng, Yan Zheng, Li Mingjie. Optimization method of Surplus new energy power cross-province trading plan based on conditional value-at-risk and output forecasting [J]. High Voltage Technology, 2022, 48(2): 467–479.
Duffield J S, Woodall B. Japan’s new basic energy plan[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(6): 3741–3749.
Løken E. Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2007, 11(7): 1584–1595.
Kleinpeter M. Energy planning and policy[C]//Fuel and energy abstracts. 1995, 5(36): 382.
Arnette A N. Renewable energy and carbon capture and sequestration for a reduced carbon energy plan: An optimization model[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2017, 70: 254–265.
Brandoni C, Polonara F. The role of municipal energy planning in the regional energy-planning process[J]. Energy, 2012, 48(1): 323–338.
Østergaard P A. Reviewing EnergyPLAN simulations and performance indicator applications in EnergyPLAN simulations[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 154: 921–933.
Debnath K B, Mourshed M. Forecasting methods in energy planning models[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 88: 297–325.
Prasad R D, Bansal R C, Raturi A. Multi-faceted energy planning: A review[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2014, 38: 686–699.
Mirakyan A, De Guio R. Integrated energy planning in cities and territories: A review of methods and tools[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2013, 22: 289–297.
Mirakyan A, De Guio R. Modelling and uncertainties in integrated energy planning[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 46: 62–69.
Lund H, Østergaard P A, Connolly D, et al. Smart energy and smart energy systems[J]. Energy, 2017, 137: 556–565.
Yusoff Y, Ngadiman M S, Zain A M. Overview of NSGA-II for optimizing machining process parameters[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 15: 3978–3983.
Hamdani T M, Won J M, Alimi A M, et al. Multi-objective feature selection with NSGA II[C]//Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms: 8th International Conference, ICANNGA 2007, Warsaw, Poland, April 11–14, 2007, Proceedings, Part I 8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 240–247.
DeCarolis J, Daly H, Dodds P, et al. Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling[J]. Applied energy, 2017, 194: 184–198.
Wang, Penghong, et al. “A Gaussian error correction multi-objective positioning model with NSGA-II.” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 32.5 (2020): e5464.
Hansen K, Mathiesen B V, Skov I R. Full energy system transition towards 100% renewable energy in Germany in 2050[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 102: 1–13.
Terrados J, Almonacid G, PeRez-Higueras P. Proposal for a combined methodology for renewable energy planning. Application to a Spanish region[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2009, 13(8): 2022–2030.
Wu C B, Huang G H, Liu Z P, et al. Scenario analysis of carbon emissions’ anti-driving effect on Qingdao’s energy structure adjustment with an optimization model, Part II: Energy system planning and management[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2017, 188: 120–136.
https://aeeeuropeenergy.com/