Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4411Keywords:
Social acceptance, renewable energy, wind powerAbstract
Climate change and the requirement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are becoming a growing concern and challenge for mankind. Renewable energy sources emerge as a promising solution that can address this concern. However, in formulating development policies, planning, and practical implementation of renewable energy projects, there have been many objections and barriers from the public due to concerns about the negative effects of developing these forms of energy. This makes it challenging to achieve the development plans and goals of national commitments to combat climate change. The study of social acceptance of renewable energy technologies has become an area of research with many publications. This article provides an overview of the research field on the social acceptance of renewable energy in general and wind power in particular, including integrating the research situation in Vietnam.
Downloads
References
Bành Thị Hồng Lan, “Phân tích thực trạng phát thải khí nhà kính tại Việt Nam,” Tạp chí Công Thương. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://tapchicongthuong.vn/bai-viet/phantich-thuc-trang-phat-thai-khi-nha-kinh-tai-viet-nam-72541.htm
Thủ tướng Chính phủ, "Quyết định Phê duyệt Quy hoạch phát triển điện lực quốc gia thời kỳ 2021-2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2050", QĐ số 500/QĐ-TTg ngày 15/5/2023, 2023.
B. R. Upreti and D. Van Der Horst, “National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61–69, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00099-0.
M. Irfan, Z. Chen, T. S. Adebayo, and M. A. S. Al-Faryan, “Socioeconomic and technological drivers of sustainability and resources management: Demonstrating the role of information and communications technology and financial development using advanced wavelet coherence approach,” Resources Policy, vol. 79, p. 103038, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103038.
Bành Thị Hồng Lan, “Phân tích thực trạng phát thải khí nhà kính tại Việt Nam,” Tạp chí Công Thương. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://tapchicongthuong.vn/bai-viet/phantich-thuc-trang-phat-thai-khi-nha-kinh-tai-viet-nam-72541.htm
Thủ tướng Chính phủ, "Quyết định Phê duyệt Quy hoạch phát triển điện lực quốc gia thời kỳ 2021-2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2050", QĐ số 500/QĐ-TTg ngày 15/5/2023, 2023.
B. R. Upreti and D. Van Der Horst, “National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61–69, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00099-0.
M. Irfan, Z. Chen, T. S. Adebayo, and M. A. S. Al-Faryan, “Socioeconomic and technological drivers of sustainability and resources management: Demonstrating the role of information and communications technology and financial development using advanced wavelet coherence approach,” Resources Policy, vol. 79, p. 103038, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103038.
P. Devine-Wright, “Reconsidering public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: A critical review,” Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and Policy, Jan. 2008.
S. Fast, “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: Trends, Concepts, and Geographies: Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy,” Geography Compass, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 853–866, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1111/gec3.12086.
P. Upham, C. Oltra, and À. Boso, “Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 8, pp. 100–112, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.erss. 2015.05.003.
B. B. F. Wittneben, “The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–3, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002.
“Statement on ending subsidies for onshore wind GOV.UK.” Accessed: Jul. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov. uk/government/speeches/statement-on-ending-subsidies-for-onsho re-wind
B. Anderson, T. Böhmelt, and H. Ward, “Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 12, no. 11, p. 114011, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f80.
M. Suškevičs et al., “Regional variation in public acceptance of wind energy development in Europe: What are the roles of planning procedures and participation?,” Land Use Policy, vol. 81, pp. 311– 323, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.032.
M. J. Pasqualetti, P. Gipe, and R. W. Righter, “A Landscape of Power,” in Wind Power in View, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 3–16. doi: 10.1016/B978-012546334-8/50001-2.
M. Wolsink, “Social acceptance revisited: gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 46, pp. 287–295, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018. 07.034.
P. Devine-Wright, S. Batel, O. Aas, B. Sovacool, M. C. Labelle, and A. Ruud, “A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage,” Energy Policy, vol. 107, pp. 27–31, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.020.
J. Gaede and I. H. Rowlands, “Visualizing social acceptance research,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 40, pp. 142–158, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.12.006.
Thủ tướng Chính phủ, "Quyết định Phê duyệt Chiến lược phát triển năng lượng tái tạo của Việt Nam đến năm 2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2050", QĐ số 2068/QĐ-TTg ngày 25/11/2015, Accessed: Jul. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://datafiles.chinhphu.vn/cpp/files/vbpq/2015/11/2068.signed.pdf
Thủ tướng Chính phủ, "Quyết định Phê duyệt điều chỉnh quy hoạch phát triển điện lực quốc gia giai đoạn 2011-2020 có xét đến năm 2030", QĐ số 428/QĐ-TTg ngày 18/03/2016, Accessed: Jul. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://datafiles.chinhphu.vn/cpp/files/vbpq/2016/03/428.signed.pdf
“Nghị quyết 55-NQ/TW 2020 định hướng Chiến lược phát triển năng lượng quốc gia của Việt Nam.” Accessed: Jul. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Tai-ngu yen-Moi-truong/Nghi-quyet-55-NQ-TW-2020-dinh-huong-Chienluoc-phat-trien-nang-luong-quoc-gia-cua-Viet-Nam-435381.aspx
thuvienphapluat.vn, “Quyết định 37/2011/QĐ-TTg cơ chế hỗ trợ phát triển các dự án điện gió,” THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT. Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/vanban/Dau-tu/Quyet-dinh-37-2011-QD-TTg-co-che-ho-tro-phat-trie n-cac-du-an-dien-gio-125998.aspx
thuvienphapluat.vn, “Thông tư 32/2012/TT-BCT thực hiện phát triển điện gió Hợp đồng mua bán điện mẫu,” THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT. Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://thuvie nphapluat.vn/van-ban/Thuong-mai/Thong-tu-32-2012-TT-BCT-th uc-hien-phat-trien-dien-gio-Hop-dong-mua-ban-dien-mau-15137 5.aspx
thuvienphapluat.vn, “Thông tư 96/2012/TT-BTC cơ chế tài chính hỗ trợ giá điện đối với dự án điện gió,” THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT. Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://thuvien phapluat.vn/van-ban/Dau-tu/Thong-tu-96-2012-TT-BTC-co-chetai-chinh-ho-tro-gia-dien-do i-voi-du-an-dien-gio-140552.aspx
thuvienphapluat.vn, “Thông tư 06/2013/TT-BCT nội dung trình tự thủ tục quy hoạch phát triển điện gió,” THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT. Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://thuvien phapluat.vn/van-ban/Dau-tu/Thong-tu-06-2013-TT-BCT-noi-dung -trinh-tu-thu-tuc-quy-hoach-phat-tr ien-dien-gio-175580.aspx
“Quyết định 39/2018/QĐ-TTg sửa đổi Quyết định 37/2011/QĐTTg cơ chế hỗ trợ các dự án điện gió.” Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Dau-tu/Quyet-dinh-39-2018-QD-TTg-sua-doi-Quyet-dinh-37-2011-QD-T Tg-co-che-ho-tro-cac-du -an-dien-gio-393826.aspx
“Thông tư 02/2019/TT-BCT phát triển dự án điện gió Hợp đồng mua bán điện mẫu cho dự án điện gió mới nhất.” Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/vanban/Thuong-mai/Thong-tu-02-2019-TT-BCT-phat-trien-du-andien-gio-Hop-dong-mua-ban-dien-mau-cho-du-an-dien-gio- 404946.aspx
Cổng thông tin điện tử Chính phủ, “Nghị định số 11/2021/NĐ-CP của Chính phủ: Quy định việc giao các khu vực biển nhất định cho tổ chức, cá nhân khai thác, sử dụng tài nguyên biển.” Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=271 60&docid=202661
thuvienphapluat.vn, “Quyết định 21/QĐ-BCT 2023 khung giá phát điện nhà máy điện mặt trời điện gió chuyển tiếp,” THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT. Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: http s://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Tai-nguyen-Moi-truong/Quyet-din h-21-QD-BCT-2023-khung-g ia-phat-dien-nha-may-dien-mat-troidien-gio-chuyen-tiep-549601.aspx
M. Busse and R. Siebert, “Acceptance studies in the field of land use—A critical and systematic review to advance the 26 Le Nguyen Thi et al. conceptualization of acceptance and acceptability,” Land Use Policy, vol. 76, pp. 235–245, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.016.
“Doris Lucke (auth.), PD Dr. Doris Lucke, Michael Hasse M.A. (eds.) Annahme verweigert_ Beiträge zur soziologischen Akzeptanzforschung-VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (1998).pdf.”
I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
B. Fischhoff, “Acceptable Risk_A Conceptual Proposal”.
I. Ajzen and N. Gilbert Cote, “Attitudes and the prediction of behavior,” in Attitudes and Attitude Change, 2008, pp. 289–311.
J. J. Cohen, J. Reichl, and M. Schmidthaler, “Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review,” Energy, vol. 76, pp. 4–9, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.energ y.2013.12.056.
M. Schäfer and D. Keppler, “Modelle der technikorientierten Akzeptanzforschung : Überblick und Reflexion am Beispiel eines Forschungsprojekts zur Implementierung innovativer technischer Energieeffizienz-Maßnahmen”.
J. Gaede and H. Rowlands, "Visualizing social acceptance research", 2018
N. Schwarz, “Feelings as Information: Moods Influence Judgments and Processing Strategies,” in Heuristics and Biases, 1st ed., T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 534–547. doi: 10.1017/CBO978051180 8098.031.
A. Klinke and O. Renn, “A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1,” Risk Analysis, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1071–1094, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00274.
G. Böhm and C. Tanner, “Environmental Risk Perception,” in Environmental Psychology, L. Steg and J. I. M. De Groot, Eds., Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2018, pp. 13–25. doi: 10.1002/9781119241072.ch2.
P. Slovic, “Perception of Risk,” Science, vol. 236, no. 4799, pp. 280–285, Apr. 1987, doi: 10.1126/science.3563507.
S. Hanger, N. Komendantova, B. Schinke, D. Zejli, A. Ihlal, and A. Patt, “Community acceptance of large-scale solar energy installations in developing countries: Evidence from Morocco,” Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Literature Review 27 Energy Research & Social Science vol. 14, pp. 80–89, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.20 16.01.010.
P. Schweizer-Ries, “Energy sustainable communities: Environmental psychological investigations,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 4126–4135, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008. 06.021.
K. Schumacher, “Public acceptance of renewable energies – an empirical investigation across countries and technologies”.
R. Wüstenhagen, M. Wolsink, and M. J. Bürer, “Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2683–2691, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol. 2006.12.001.
J. Stede and N. May, “Strikte Mindestabstände bremsen den Ausbau der Windenergie,” DIW Wochenbericht, 2019, doi: 10.18723/DIW_WB:201 9-48-4.
G. Ellis and G. Ferraro, The Social Acceptance of Wind Energy: Where we stand and the path ahead. 2016. doi: 10.2789/696070.
B. K. Sovacool, “What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 1, pp. 1–29, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003.
Y. Fournis and M.-J. Fortin, “From social ‘acceptance’ to social ‘acceptability’ of wind energy projects: towards a territorial perspective,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/0964 0568.2015.1133406.
B. K. Sovacool and P. Lakshmi Ratan, “Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 5268–5279, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.rser. 2012.04.048.
S. Batel, P. Devine-Wright, and T. Tangeland, “Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion,” Energy Policy, vol. 58, pp. 1–5, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013. 03.018.
C. Dermont, K. Ingold, L. Kammermann, and I. StadelmannSteffen, “Bringing the policy making perspective in: A political science approach to social acceptance,” Energy Policy, vol. 108, pp. 359–368, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.062.
M. Aitken, “Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature,” 28 Le Nguyen Thi et al. Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1834–1841, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol. 2009.11.060.
M. Wolsink, “Social acceptance, lost objects, and obsession with the ‘public’—The pressing need for enhanced conceptual and methodological rigor,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 48, pp. 269–276, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.006.
M. Wolsink, “Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2871, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13112871.
J. Gaede and I. H. Rowlands, “The value of multiple perspectives,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 48, pp. 262–268, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.007.
P. Devine-Wright, “Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy,” Wind Energ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 125–139, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1002/we.124.
D. Van Der Horst, “NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2705–2714, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
H. S. Boudet, “Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies,” Nat Energy, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 446–455, May 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0399-x.
P. R. Roddis, “Public acceptance of renewable energy in Great Britain: determinants, dimensions and decision-making”.
P. M. Khuong, F. Scheller, R. McKenna, D. Keles, and W. Fichtner, “Willingness to pay for residential PV: Reconciling gaps between acceptance and adoption,” Working Paper Series in Production and Energy, Working Paper 46, 2020. doi: 10.5445/IR/1000124530.
Đinh Thị Trang, Nguyễn Lâm Mỹ Anh, Bùi Hiểu Ly, “Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến tiêu dùng sản phẩm năng lượng mặt trời", 2021
Tạp chí Công Thương, “Sử dụng công nghệ năng lượng điện mặt trời tại Phan Rang Tháp Chàm,” Accessed: Jun. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://tapchicongthuong.vn/bai-viet/cacnhan-to-anh-huong-den-y-dinh-su-dung-cong-nghe-nang-luongdien-mat-troi-cua-ho-gia-dinh-tai-thanh-pho-phan-rang-thap- cham-77121.htm
Thân Thị Thùy Dương, "Yếu tố tác động tới ý định đầu tư điện mặt trời mái nhà ở Việt Nam nghiên cứu điển hình tại các đô thị lớn", luận án tiến sĩ, 2022.
S. S. Ho, T. Oshita, J. Looi, A. D. Leong, and A. S. F. Chuah, “Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Literature Review 29 acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam: A qualitative approach,” Energy Policy, vol. 127, pp. 259–268, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.011.
W. Chaiyapa et al., “Public perception of biofuel usage in Vietnam,” Biofuels, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–33, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/17597269.2018.1442667.
J. Anshelm and H. Simon, “Power production and environmental opinions – Environmentally motivated resistance to wind power in Sweden,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 57, pp. 1545–1555, May 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.211.
P. Ertör-Akyazı, F. Adaman, B. Özkaynak, and Ü. Zenginobuz, “Citizens’ preferences on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Evidence from Turkey,” Energy Policy, vol. 47, pp. 309–320, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.072.
M. A. Petrova, “NIMBYISM revisited: public acceptance of wind energy in the United States,” WIREs Clim Change, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 575–601, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1002/wcc.250.
M. Soland, N. Steimer, and G. Walter, “Local acceptance of existing biogas plants in Switzerland,” Energy Policy, vol. 61, pp. 802–810, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.111.
P. Del Río and M. Burguillo, “An empirical analysis of the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 6–7, pp. 1314–1325, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.001.
B. J. Rygg, “Wind power—An assault on local landscapes or an opportunity for modernization?,” Energy Policy, vol. 48, pp. 167– 175, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.004.
M. C. Slattery, B. L. Johnson, J. A. Swofford, and M. J. Pasqualetti, “The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3690–3701, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.016.
C. R. Warren and M. McFadyen, “Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from southwest Scotland,” Land Use Policy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 204–213, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010.
P. Enevoldsen and B. K. Sovacool, “Examining the social acceptance of wind energy: Practical guidelines for onshore wind 30 Le Nguyen Thi et al. project development in France,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 53, pp. 178–184, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rs er.2015.08.041.
S. Breukers and M. Wolsink, “Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2737–2750, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006. 12.004.
F. P. Boon and C. Dieperink, “Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development,” Energy Policy, vol. 69, pp. 297–307, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.046.
Y. Maruyama, M. Nishikido, and T. Iida, “The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2761–2769, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol. 2006.12.010.
B. J. A. Walker, B. Wiersma, and E. Bailey, “Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: An experimental study in England,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 3, pp. 46–54, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003.
J. Szarka, Wind Power in Europe: Politics, Business and Society. 2007.
E. Strazzera, M. Mura, and D. Contu, “Combining choice experiments with psychometric scales to assess the social acceptability of wind energy projects: A latent class approach,” Energy Policy, vol. 48, pp. 334–347, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.enpo l.2012.05.037.
N. Hall, P. Ashworth, and P. Devine-Wright, “Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies,” Energy Policy, vol. 58, pp. 200–208, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol. 2013.03.009.
J. Rand and B. Hoen, “Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned?,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 29, pp. 135–148, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ers s.2017.05.019.
M. Aitken, “Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 6066–6075, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.062.
D. Toke, “Explaining wind power planning outcomes:,” Energy Policy, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1527–1539, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004. 01.009.
M. Wolsink, “Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Literature Review 31 accusations of non-cooperation,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2692–2704, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002.
P. Devine-Wright and Y. Howes, “Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 271–280, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008.
C. R. Jones and J. R. Eiser, “Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study,” Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 4604–4614, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015.
S. Agterbosch, R. M. Meertens, and W. J. V. Vermeulen, “The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 393–405, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.10.010.
M. Sonnberger and M. Ruddat, “Local and socio-political acceptance of wind farms in Germany,” Technology in Society, vol. 51, pp. 56–65, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.005.
G. Pellegrini-Masini, Wind Power and Public Engagement: Cooperatives and Community Ownership. 2020. doi: 10.4324/97804 29491894.
S. Krohn and S. Damborg, “On public attitudes towards wind power,” Renewable Energy, vol. 16, no. 1–4, pp. 954–960, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00339-5.
C. U. Jensen, T. E. Panduro, and T. H. Lundhede, “The Vindication of Don Quixote: The Impact of Noise and Visual Pollution from Wind Turbines,” Land Economics, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 668–682, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.3368/le.90.4.668.
K. Langer, T. Decker, J. Roosen, and K. Menrad, “A qualitative analysis to understand the acceptance of wind energy in Bavaria,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 64, pp. 248–259, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.084.
A. Jobert, P. Laborgne, and S. Mimler, “Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2751–2760, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j. enpol.2006.12.005.
M. Duong, F. Grimaccia, S. Leva, M. Mussetta, N. Sava, and S. Costinas, “Performance analysis of grid-connected wind turbines,” UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering, vol. 76, pp. 169–180, Dec. 2014. 32 Le Nguyen Thi et al.
S. Wang and S. Wang, “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 437–443, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
B. Gove et al., “Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation and Widespread Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies in the UK,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 5, p. e0150956, May 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.015 0956.
J. Zoellner, P. Schweizer-Ries, and C. Wemheuer, “Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 4136–4141, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.026.
M. J. Pasqualetti, “Opposing Wind Energy Landscapes: A Search for Common Cause,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 907–917, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011. 568879.
J. Barry, G. Ellis, and C. Robinson, “Cool Rationalities and Hot Air: A Rhetorical Approach to Understanding Debates on Renewable Energy,” Global Environmental Politics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 67–98, May 2008, doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.67.
U. Liebe and G. M. Dobers, “Decomposing public support for energy policy: What drives acceptance of and intentions to protest against renewable energy expansion in Germany?,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 47, pp. 247–260, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.004.
S. Oluoch, P. Lal, A. Susaeta, and N. Vedwan, “Assessment of public awareness, acceptance and attitudes towards renewable energy in Kenya.,” Scientific African, vol. 9, p. e00512, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020. e00512.
https://aeeeuropeenergy.com/
