Study of Various C-Shaped Armatures in Electromagnetic Launcher
Keywords:
Current density, FEM, inductance gradient, normal force, railgunAbstract
The current density distribution on the cross section of the rails is affected by the geometry and dimensions of the rails and armature. This paper analyzed a rectangular railgun that is formed by two parallel rails and an armature with various geometries. Rail thickness (wr), width (hr), and separation (sr) between two rails are equal to 2 cm, 4 cm and 4 cm, respectively. C-shaped armatures have three corners that are named front, back and arm side of armature which rounded step by step. All case studies simulated with the Finite Element Method Three Dimensions (FEM3D). For all steps, the inductance gradient, normal force, current density (J) distribution and maximum values of J are computed. The force between rails and armature named normal force. This force and pressure can be changed the rails and armature form. Friction force is increasing with increasing normal force. Maximum current densities occur at the armature corners and contact section between the rails and armature. These phenomena can produce a hot point that fuse the railgun and must be considered in armature and rail designing. This paper investigates the effect of armature geometry and dimensions on current density distribution, maximum value of current density, inductance gradient and normal force or normal pressure on armature.
Downloads
References
M. S. Bayati, A. Keshtkar, and A. Keshtkar, “Transition study of current distribution and maximum current density in railgun by 3D FEM and IEM,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 13-17, Jan. 2011.
R. A. Marshall, “Railgun bore geometry round or square?,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 427-431, Jan. 1999.
A. Keshtkar, S. Bayati, and A. Keshtkar, “Derivation of a formula for inductance gradient using IEM,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 305-308, Jan. 2009.
M. S. Bayati and A. Keshtkar, “Study of the current distribution, magnetic field, and L′ of rectangular and circular railguns,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1376-1381, May 2013.
L. Chen, J. He, Z. Xiao, and Y. Pan, “Threedimensional numerical simulation of the joule heating of various shapes of armatures in railguns,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 456-460, Jan. 2011.
J. F. Kerrisk, “Electrical and thermal modelling of railgun,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. MAG-20, no. 1, pp. 339-402, 1984.
H. Vanicek and S. Satapathy, “Thermal characteristics of a laboratory electromagnetic launcher,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 188-193, Jan. 2005.
J. D. Powell and A. E. Zielinski, “Ohmic heating in a double-taper sabot-armature,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 153-157, Jan. 2003.
L. Rip, S. Satapathy, and K-T. Hsieh, “Effect of geometry change on the current density distribution in C-shaped armature,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 72- 75, Jan. 2003.
M. S. Bayati, “Projectile geometry,” 16th EML Symposium, China, June 2012.
B-K. Kim and K-T. Hsieh, “Effect of rail/armature geometry on current density distribution and L′,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 413-416, Jan. 1999.
L. Chen, J. He, Z. Xiao, and Y. Pan, “Augmentation of current ramp-down contact pressure in C-shaped armature railguns,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 48-52, Jan. 2011.
D. C. Haugh and G. M. G. Hainsworth, “Why “C” armature work (and why they don’t!),” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 52- 55, Jan. 2003.
S. Xia, J. He, L. Chen, Z. Xiao, and J. Li, “Studies on interference fit between armatures and rails in railguns,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 186-191, Jan. 2011.
Q. Lv, Z. Li, B. Lei, K. Zhao, Q. Zhang, H. Xiang, and S. Xie, “Primary structural design and optimal armature simulation for a practical electromagnetic launcher,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1403-1409, May 2013.
