Implementation of Two Different Moving Window FDTD Methods to Simulate the Electromagnetic Propagation in Tunnel with Parallel Computing
Keywords:
EMP, Finite-Difference Time- Domain (FDTD), moving window, parallel computing, tunnelAbstract
Tunnel engineering is electrically large compared with the GHz electromagnetic pulse (EMP), it is difficult to simulate the EMP propagation in large-scale and long-distances vaulted tunnel by using the conventional finite- difference time-domain (FDTD) method. In this work, based on the parallel computing, two kinds of moving window FDTD (MW-FDTD) methods are presented to simulate the EMP propagation in tunnel, the results are validated by comparing with the results of the conventional parallel FDTD method. The convolution PML (CPML) is adopted to truncate the computation domain, which reduces the reflection error greatly. The accuracy and the efficiency of the proposed method are proposed by comparing with the conventional method. Results show that the relative errors for the Alternate MW- FDTD (AMW-FDTD) and the Chain MW-FDTD (CMW-FDTD) are 0.11% and 0.43%, respectively. The CPU time for the AMW-FDTD method can be reduced to about 45% of the conventional FDTD method, while the CMW-FDTD method can be reduced to about 35%.
Downloads
References
J. W. Schuster, K. C. Wu, R. R. Ohs, and R. J. Luebbers, “Application of moving window FDTD to predicting path loss over forest covered irregular terrain,” Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1607-1610, 2004.
Y. Wu and Ian Wassell, “Introduction to the segmented finite-difference time-domain method,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 45, 1364-1367, 2009.
M. Masud Rana and A. Sanagavarapu Mohan, “Segmented locally one dimensional FDTD method for EM propagation inside large complex tunnel environments,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 48, 223-226, 2012.
F. Akleman and L. Sevgi, “Realistic surface modeling for a finite difference time domain wave propagator,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propagat., vol. 51, no. 7, July 2003.


