Modeling and Analysis of Anechoic Chamber Using CEM Tools

Authors

  • D. Campbell EM Software & Systems (USA), Inc. 100 Exploration Way, Suite 300, Hampton, VA 23666
  • G. Gampala EM Software & Systems (USA), Inc. 100 Exploration Way, Suite 300, Hampton, VA 23666
  • C. J. Reddy EM Software & Systems (USA), Inc. 100 Exploration Way, Suite 300, Hampton, VA 23666
  • M. Winebrand ORBIT/FR, Inc. 506 Prudential Road, Horsham, PA 19044
  • J. Aubin ORBIT/FR, Inc. 506 Prudential Road, Horsham, PA 19044

Keywords:

Anechoic chamber, axial ratio, computational electromagnetics, FEKO, finite element method, physicaloptics

Abstract

Advances in computational resources facilitate anechoic chamber modeling and analysis at VHF/UHF frequencies using full-wave solvers available in commercial software such as FEKO. The measurement community has a substantial and increasing interest in utilizing computational electromagnetic (CEM) tools to minimize the financial and real estate resources required to design and construct a custom anechoic chamber without sacrificing performance. A full-wave simulation analysis such as the finite element method (FEM) provides a more accurate solution than the approximations inherent to asymptotic ray-tracing techniques such as physical optics (PO), which have traditionally been exploited to overcome computational resource limitations. An anechoic chamber is simulated with a rectangular down-range cross-section (in contrast with the traditional square cross-section) to utilize the software’s capability to assess polarization performance. The absorber layout within the anechoic chamber can be optimized using FEKO for minimal reflections and an acceptable axial ratio in the quiet zone. Numerical results of quiet zone disturbances and axial ratios are included for both low- and medium-gain source antennas over a broad frequency range.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Winebrand and J. Aubin, “Test zone performance in low frequency anechoic chambers,” Proceeding of the AMTA, pp. 482-486, 2008.

M. Winebrand and J. Aubin, “Low frequency 3-D electromagnetic analysis of anechoic chamber performance,” Microwave Journal, October 2008.

M. Agatonovic, Z. Marinkovic, and V. Markovic, “Application of ANNs in evaluation of microwave pyramidal absorber performance,” Applied Comp. Electro. Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 27, no. 4, Apr. 2012.

FEKO Suite 6.1, EM Software and Systems, 2011. www.feko.info

U. Jakobus and F. M. Landstorfer, “Improved POMM hybrid formulation for scattering from threedimensional perfectly conducting bodies of arbitrary shape,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 43, pp. 162-169, Feb. 1995.

I. P. Theron, D. B. Davidson, and U. Jakobus, “Hybridization of the method of moments with a UTD treatment of a conducting cylinder,” Proceedings of the 8th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation, CEFC'98, Tucson, pp. 107, June 1998.

M. Bingle, J. Tonder, and U. Jakobus, “Acceleration of the hybrid FEM/MoM technology in FEKO with the multilevel fast multipole method,” The 10th International Workshop on Finite Elements for Microwave Engineering, Oct. 2010.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-27

How to Cite

[1]
D. . Campbell, G. . Gampala, C. J. . Reddy, M. . Winebrand, and J. . Aubin, “Modeling and Analysis of Anechoic Chamber Using CEM Tools”, ACES Journal, vol. 28, no. 09, pp. 755–762, Sep. 2021.

Issue

Section

General Submission