Study on the Matrix Pencil Method with Application to Predict Time-domain Response of a Reverberation Chamber

Authors

  • Song Wang Research Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection Mechanical Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China
  • Zhan C. Wu Research Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection Mechanical Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China
  • Lei Du Research Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection Mechanical Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China
  • Guang H. Wei Research Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection Mechanical Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China
  • Yao Z. Cui Research Institute of Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Protection Mechanical Engineering College, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China

Keywords:

Digital band-pass filter, FDTD, matrix pencil method, reverberation chamber, signal prediction

Abstract

The full wave simulation of reverberation chamber in time domain usually takes large computational time because of its resonant characteristic. This contribution makes the pioneer exploration of accelerating this kind of simulation by time-domain signal prediction. The prediction technique is based on the well known matrix pencil method (MPM). An approximation to the existing MPM is proposed to obtain a new kind of MPM, which is more computationally efficient. To conduct the prediction effectively, the signal’s oversampling should be avoided and the singular values appeared in MPM should be judged appropriately. The signal can be resampled according to Nyquist sampling law while the singular values can be selected by the newly proposed criterion based on cavity theory. For wideband time-domain responses, it is suggested to apply digital band-pass filter before prediction to get higher precision. Using the proposed methods, the computational time can be reduced almost 50 % for the reverberation chamber’s FDTD simulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. H. Rudander, I.-E.-Khuda, P.-S. Kildal, and C. Orlenius, “Measurements of RFID tag sensitivity in reverberation chamber,” IEEE Antennas And Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1345-1348, 2011.

C. Bruns and R. Vahldieck, “A closer look at reverberation chambers 3-D simulation and experimental verification,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 612-626, 2005.

S. Lallechere, P. Bonnet, S. Girard, F. Diouf, and F. Paladian, “Evaluation of FVTD dissipation and time-domain hybridization for MSRC studies,” Presented at the 23rd Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Verona, Italy, 2007.

H. P. Zhao and Z. X. Shen, “Efficient modeling of three-dimensional reverberation chambers using hybrid discrete singular convolution-method of moments,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 2943-2953, 2011.

A. Z. Elsherbeni and V. Demir, The FiniteDifference Time-Domain Method for Electromagnetics with MATLAB Simulations, SciTech Publishing Inc., Raleigh, NC, 2009.

H. Bruns, C. Schuster, and H. Singer, “Numerical electromagnetic field analysis for EMC problems,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 253-262, 2007.

F. Moglie, “Convergence of the reverberation chambers to the equilibrium analyzed with the finite-difference time-domain algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 469-476, 2004.

Y. Hua and T. K. Sarkar, “Matrix pencil method for estimating parameters of exponentially damped/umdamped sinusoids in noise,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 814-824, 1990.

B. Lu, D. Wei, B. Evans, and A. Bovik, “Improved matrix pencil methods,” presented at the Conference Record of the Thirty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 1998.

K. Chahine, V. Baltazart, and Y. Wang, “Parameter estimation of damped power-law phase signals via a recursive and alternately projected matrix pencil method,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1207-1216, 2011.

Y. Liu, Z. Nie, and Q. Liu, “Reducing the number of elements in a linear antenna array by the matrix pencil method,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2955-2962, 2008.

J. Ritter and F. Amdt, “Efficient FDTD/matrixpencil method for the full-wave scattering parameter analysis of waveguiding structures,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2450-2456, 1996.

Y. Yang, S. Hu, R. Chen, H. Zhang, and T. Liu, “FDTD analysis with modified matrix pencil method for the UC-EBG lowpass filters,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 37-41, 2005.

IEC 61000-4-21, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-21: Testing and Measurement Techniques - Reverberation Chamber Test Methods, ed: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), pp. 40-44, 2011.

T. Sarkar and O. Pereira, “Using the matrix pencil method to estimate the parameters of a sum of complex exponentials,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 48-55, 1995.

Y. Li, K. R. Liu, and J. Razavilar, “A parameter estimation scheme for damped sinusoidal signals based on low-rank Hankel approximation,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 481-486, 1997.

S. Wang, Z. Wu, G. Wei, Y. Cui, and L. Fan, “A new method of estimating reverberation chamber Q-factor with experimental validation,” Progress In Electromagnetic Research Letters , vol. 36, pp. 103-112, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-27

How to Cite

[1]
S. . Wang, Z. C. . Wu, L. . Du, G. H. . Wei, and Y. Z. . Cui, “Study on the Matrix Pencil Method with Application to Predict Time-domain Response of a Reverberation Chamber”, ACES Journal, vol. 28, no. 09, pp. 763–771, Sep. 2021.

Issue

Section

General Submission