A Comparison of the Element Free Galerkin Method and the Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin Method for Solving Electromagnetic Problems

Authors

  • Wei He School of Electrical Engineering Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
  • Zehui Liu School of Electrical Engineering Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
  • Richard K. Gordon Department of Electrical Engineering University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
  • W. Elliott Hutchcraft Department of Electrical Engineering University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
  • Fan Yang School of Electrical Engineering Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
  • Afei Chang State Nuclear Electric Power Planning Design & Research Institute Beijing, 100095, China

Keywords:

electromagnetic problems, meshless method, the element free Galerkin method, the local Petrov-Galerkin method

Abstract

In this paper, the element free Galerkin (EFG) method and the local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method are compared for solving the electromagnetic problems. The EFG method and MLPG method are introduced at first. Both of the EFG and the MLPG methods are formulated in detail with Poisson’s equation. Based on basic electromagnetic problems, the numerical results from the EFG method and MLPG method are given in this paper. The numerical results show that the EFG method and MLPG method both work well for the solution of electromagnetic problems. The EFG method, based on global weak form, needs background meshes for integration, and it needs more nodes to get an accurate result but it requires less cost in computational time. The MLPG method as a true meshless method doesn’t needs any meshes in the implementation and can obtain an accurate result using fewer nodes than EFG. However, because the MLPG Method needs more integration nodes and has asymmetric matrices, it needs more CPU time than the EFG method with the condition that the same number of nodes is used in the problem domain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Q. Li and K. M. Lee, "An adaptive meshless method for magnetic field computation," Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 42, pp. 1996-2003, 2006.

G. R. Liu, Meshfree Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method, Boca Raton, CRC, 2009.

T. Belytschko, Y. Y. Lu and L. Gu, "Element-free Galerkin methods," International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 229-256, 1994.

I. Singh, "Meshless EFG method in threedimensional heat transfer problems: a numerical comparison, cost and error analysis," Numerical Heat Transfer Part A: Applications, vol. 46, pp. 199-220, 2004.

M. H. Afshar, M. Naisipour and J. Amani, "Node moving adaptive refinement strategy for planar elasticity problems using discrete least squares meshless method," Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 47, pp. 1315-1325, 2011.

P. F. Thomas and G. M. Hermann, "Classification and overview of meshfree methods," Institute of Scientific Computing, Technical University Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany, 2004.

R. D. Soares, R. C. Mesquita, F. J. S. Moreira, “Axisymmetric electromagnetic resonant cavity solution by a meshless local Galerkin method,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 26, pp. 792 – 799, 2011.

R. K. Gordon, W. E. Hutchcraft, “The use of multiquadric radial basis functions in open region problems,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 21, pp. 127 – 134, 2006.

K. Y. Dai, G. R. Liu, K. M. Lim, and Y. T. Gu, "Comparison between the radial point interpolation and the Kriging interpolation used in meshfree methods," Computational Mechanics, vol. 32, pp. 60-70, 2003.

M. Fooladi, H. Golbakhshi, M. Mohammadi, and A. Soleimani, "An improved meshless method for analyzing the time dependent problems in solid mechanics," Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 35, pp. 1297-1302, 2011.

S. N. Atluri and S. Shen, "The meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method: A simple & less-costly alternative to the finite element and boundary element methods," CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 11-52, 2002.

S. Ikuno, K. Takakura and A. Kamitani, "Influence of Method for Imposing Essential Boundary Condition on Meshless Galerkin/Petrov Galerkin Approaches," Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 43, pp. 1501-1504, 2007.

P. Lancaster and K. Salkauskas, "Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods," Mathematics of Computation, vol. 37, pp. 141-158, 1981.

J. Dolbow and T. Belytschko, "An introduction to programming the meshless Element Free Galerkin method," Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 207-241, 1998.

S. N. Atluri, H. G. Kim and J. Y. Cho, "A critical assessment of the truly meshless local PetrovGalerkin (MLPG), and local boundary integral equation (LBIE) methods," Computational Mechanics, vol. 24, pp. 348-372, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

[1]
W. . He, Z. . Liu, R. K. . Gordon, W. E. . Hutchcraft, F. . Yang, and A. . Chang, “A Comparison of the Element Free Galerkin Method and the Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin Method for Solving Electromagnetic Problems”, ACES Journal, vol. 27, no. 08, pp. 620–629, Dec. 2021.

Issue

Section

Articles