Comparative Evaluation of Some Empirical Design Techniques for CAD Optimization of Wideband U-Slot Microstrip Antennas

Authors

  • V. Natarajan Elec- trical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia, USA, and University of Madras, Chennai, India
  • Deb Chatterjee Electronics and Telecom- munication Engineering from Jadavpur University, Kolkata (Calcutta), India

Keywords:

Comparative Evaluation of Some Empirical Design Techniques for CAD Optimization of Wideband U-Slot Microstrip Antennas

Abstract

In this paper three different empirical
techniques, for design of wideband U-slot microstrip
patch antennas on infinite, grounded substrates (r
= 1.0, 4.0, and 6.15), has been studied extensively.
Methods I and III, developed by the present authors,
commonly utilize the property of dimensional invariance
in designing the radiating patch of the U-Slot microstrip
antenna. These two methods use empirical (quadratic)
curve-fit equations, and formulas for design of probe-fed
rectangular patches, respectively, to initiate the corre-
sponding probe-fed U-Slot patch designs. The second
(method II) approach, published earlier by different
authors, principally utilizes the distinction between
four resonant frequencies and calculates the various
dimensions associated with the U-Slot patch radiator.
The initial U-slot designs from the three empirical
techniques have been further optimized for enhanced
bandwidths via: (a) parametric simulation, and (b)
built-in global optimizers such as Powell and Genetic
algorithms in the commercially available microstrip
CAD software, IE3D. Extensive analysis, based on: (a)
comparison of the three empirical design algorithms
(methods I, II and III) , and, (b) impedance behavior
(and VSWR characteristics) of U-slot antennas on low,
medium and high permittivity substrates, show that
method III is generally superior to methods I and II.
Additionally, since the overall U-Slot patch dimensions
follow the relation W
L ≈ 1.385 (methods I and III), and,
W
L ≈ 2.0 (method II), U-Slot designs via methods I
and III have lower cross-polar levels in the principal
(φ = 0◦, 90◦) planes compared to those obtained via
method II

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Garg, P. Bhartia, I. Bahl and A. Ittipiboon, Microstrip

Antenna Design Handbook. Norwood, MA, USA: Artech

House, Inc., 2001.

D. R. Jackson et. al., “Computer-Aided Design of Rectangular

Microstrip Antennas,” chapter 5 in

Advances in Microstrip

and Printed Antennas, Kai-Fong Lee and Wei Chen (eds.),

John-Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, USA, 1997.

K.-F. Lee, K.-M. Luk, K.-F. Tong, S.-M. Shum, T. Huynh,

and R. Q. Lee, “Experimental and Simulation Studies of the

Coaxially Fed U-Slot Rectangular Patch Antenna,”IEE Proc.

Microw. Antennas Propag., part H, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 354-

, October 1997.

K.-F. Tong, K.-M. Luk, K.-F. Lee and R. Q. Lee, “A Broad-

Band U-Slot Rectangular Patch Antenna on a Microwave

Substrate,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 48, no. 6,

pp. 954-960, June 2000.

V. Natarajan and D. Chatterjee, “An Empirical Ap-

proach for Design of Wideband, Probe-Fed, U-Slot Mi-

crostrip Patch Antennas on Single-Layer, Infinite, Grounded

Substrates,”Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society

(ACES) Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 191-201, November 2003.

S. Weigand, G. H. Huff, K. H. Pan and J. T. Bernhard,

“Analysis and Design of Broad-Band Single-Layer Rectangu-

lar U-Slot Microstrip Patch Antennas,”IEEE Trans. Antennas

Propagat., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 457-468, March 2003.

Zeland Software, Inc., IE3D User’s Manual, Release(s) 9.0.

Fremont, CA, USA.

ACES JOURNAL, VOL. 20, NO. 1, MARCH 2005

V. Natarajan, E. Chettiar, and D. Chatterjee, “Performance of

Two Empirical Techniques for Design of Optimized, Wide-

band, U-Slot Antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation

and URSI/USNC Symposium Digest, vol. 3, pp. 2424-2427,

Monterey, CA, June, 2004.

E. Chettiar, V. Natarajan, and D. Chatterjee, “Effect of

Slot Width Variation on Performance of Wideband, Probe-

Fed, U-slot Patch Antennas,”IEEE Antennas and Propagation

and URSI/USNC Symposium Digest, vol. 2, pp. 1792-1795,

Monterey, CA, June, 2004.

V. Natarajan and D. Chatterjee, “An Empirical Design

Technique for U-slot Microstrip Antennas on Microwave

Substrates; Part-I: Infinite Ground Plane Analysis,” technical

report ECE-UMKC02-HNYWL-TR01, prepared under con-

tract for Honeywell Federal Manufactoring and Technologies,

KC, MO, ECE Division, SICE, UMKC, September 2002.

V. Natarajan and D. Chatterjee, “Optimization Studies for

Single-Layer, Wideband, U-Slot Antennas on Microwave

Substrates Using the IE3D Code,” Proceedings of 20th An-

nual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electro-

magnetics at Syracuse, NY, April 19-23, 2004.

V. Natarajan and D. Chatterjee, “Effect of Substrate Per-

mittivity and Thickness on Performance of Single-Layer,

Wideband, U-Slot Antennas on Microwave Substrates,” Pro-

ceedings of 20th Annual Review of Progress in Applied

Computational Electromagnetics at Syracuse, NY, April 19-

, 2004.

R. Bhalla and L. Shafai, “Resonance Behavior of Single

U-Slot Microstrip Patch Antennas,” Microwave and Optical

Technology Letters, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 333-335, March 5 2002.

E. Chettiar, V. Natarajan, and D. Chatterjee, “Comparison

of Resonant Frequency Calculations for Wideband U-Slot

Antennas on Microwave Substrates,” IEEE Antennas and

Propagation and URSI/USNC Symposium Digest, vol. 4, pp.

-3716, Monterey, CA, June 21-27, 2004.

D. Chatterjee, “Development of a Fast, Iterative Com-

puter Code for Simulations of Probe-Fed, Rectangular Patch

Microstrip Antennas,” part II of report ECE-UMKC00-

HNYWL-TR01, June 2000, prepared under contract for Hon-

eywell International Inc., FM&T, KC, MO.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-18

How to Cite

[1]
V. . Natarajan and D. . Chatterjee, “Comparative Evaluation of Some Empirical Design Techniques for CAD Optimization of Wideband U-Slot Microstrip Antennas”, ACES Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 50–69, Jun. 2022.

Issue

Section

General Submission