Electromagnetic Scattering from a Three-dimensional Object using Physics-informed Neural Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/2025.ACES.J.400203Keywords:
electromagnetic scattering, Maxwell’s equations, physics-informed neural networkAbstract
Prediction of electromagnetic fields scattered from objects is of great significance in various fields. Traditional computational electromagnetic solvers, which are mesh-based, are expensive and time-consuming. The deep learning technique becomes an alternative method of the prediction of scattered fields with high efficiency. However, the data-driven deep learning method requires a large data set and lacks robustness. For complicated scattering problems, the construction of a large training data set is a hard task. By considering physics-constraints, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can solve the partial differential equation (PDE) problem with a small data set and also provide a physical explanation. In this paper, the PINNs are employed to solve the scattering of a plane wave by a three-dimensional object with Maxwell’s equations being physical constraints. In the calculation, a sphere and an ellipsoid are taken as examples, and the effects of the network parameters (including the number of hidden layers, and the number of data sets) are mainly discussed. The results have practical applications in many fields such as radar detection, biomedical imaging, and satellite navigation.
Downloads
References
M. S. Zhdanov, Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems, vol. 36, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002.
A. Abubakar, P. M. Van den Berg, and J. J. Mallorqui, “Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1761-1771, 2002.
X. Wang, T. Qin, R. S. Witte, and H. Xin, “Computational feasibility study of contrast-enhanced thermoacoustic imaging for breast cancer detection using realistic numerical breast phantoms,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1489-1501, 2015.
C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, New York: Wiley, 2016.
A. Taflove, S. C. Hagness, and M. Piket-May, “Computational electromagnetics: The finite-difference time-domain method,” The Electrical Engineering Handbook, vol. 3, pp. 629-670,2005.
K. Yee, “Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 302-307,1966.
J.-M. Jin, The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics, New York: Wiley, 2015.
R. C. Rumpf, “Simple implementation of arbitrarily shaped total-field/scattered-field regions in finite-difference frequency-domain,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, vol. 36, pp. 221-248, 2012.
J. Smajic, C. Hafner, L. Raguin, K. Tavzarashvili, and M. Mishrikey, “Comparison of numerical methods for the analysis of plasmonic structures,” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 763-774, 2009.
A. Massa, D. Marcantonio, X. Chen, M. Li, and M. Salucci, “DNNs as applied to electromagnetics, antennas, and propagation—A review,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2225-2229, 2019.
Y. Li, Y. Wang, S. Qi, Q. Ren, L. Kang, S. D. Campbell, P. L. Werner, and D. H. Werner, “Predicting scattering from complex nano-structures via deep learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 139983-139993, 2020.
I. E. Lagaris, A. Likas, and D. I. Fotiadis, “Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary an partial differential equations,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 987-1000, 1998.
M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686-707, 2019.
L. D. Landau, The Classical Theory of Fields, vol. 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.


