Improving Kriging Surrogate Model for EMC Uncertainty Analysis Using LSSVR

Authors

  • Shenghang Huo College of Marine Electrical Engineering Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
  • Yujia Song School of Electrical Engineering Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116000, China
  • Qing Liu College of Marine Electrical Engineering Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
  • Jinjun Bai College of Marine Electrical Engineering Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/2024.ACES.J.390705

Keywords:

Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), Kriging, least squares support vector machine regression (LSSVR), surrogate model, uncertainty analysis method

Abstract

As the in-depth study of uncertainty analysis in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) progresses, the surrogate model-based uncertainty analysis method has increasingly become a popular research topic. The Kriging model is one of the classical surrogate models and plays an important role in EMC uncertainty analysis. However, an in-depth study of the Kriging sampling strategy is missing in the existing research on uncertainty analysis. The traditional sampling strategy employs Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) to select all sampling points at once, which makes the computational efficiency and accuracy of the surrogate model uncontrollable. This paper proposes a strategy that applies least squares support vector machine regression (LSSVR) to assist Kriging in sampling, significantly improving the efficiency and accuracy of the Kriging surrogate model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shenghang Huo, College of Marine Electrical Engineering Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Shenghang Huo received the B.Eng. degree in electrical engineering and automation from Dalian Maritime University in 2023. He is currently a graduate student in electrical engineering at Dalian Maritime University, where his research interests include machine learning and uncertainty analysis methods in EMC simulation.

Yujia Song, School of Electrical Engineering Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116000, China

Yujia Song received a Ph.D. in the School of Energy and Power Engineering at Dalian University of Technology in 2024. Her main research interests are integrated energy system design, novel power system modeling for offshore wind power, and computational electromagnetics simulation.

Qing Liu, College of Marine Electrical Engineering Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Qing Liu received the B.Eng. degree in electrical engineering and automation from Hubei University of Technology in 2023. He is currently a graduate student in electrical engineering at Dalian Maritime University, where his research interests include microgrid optimal dispatch, computational electromagnetics simulation for offshore wind power.

Jinjun Bai, College of Marine Electrical Engineering Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Jinjun Bai received the B.Eng. degree in electrical engineering and automation in 2013, and Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering in 2019 from the Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China. He is now a lecturer at Dalian Maritime University. His research interests include uncertainty analysis methods in EMC simulation, multi-physics field simulation method.

References

J. Bai, K. Guo, J. Sun, and N. Wang, “Application of the multi-element grid in EMC uncertainty simulation,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 428-434, Apr. 2022.

R. Trinchero, M. Larbi, H. M. Torun, F. G. Canavero, and M. Swaminathan, “Machine learning and uncertainty quantification for surrogate models of integrated devices with a large number of parameters,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 4056-4066, Dec. 2019.

A. Biondi, D. Vande Ginste, D. De Zutter, P. Manfredi, and F. G. Canavero, “Variability analysis of interconnects terminated by general nonlinear loads,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manufact. Technol., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1244-1251, July 2013.

J. Shen, H. Yang, and J. Chen, “Analysis of electrical property variations for composite medium using a stochastic collocation method,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 272-279, Apr. 2012.

J. Bai, G. Zhang, A. P. Duffy, and L. Wang, “Dimension-reduced sparse grid strategy for a stochastic collocation method in EMC software,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 218-224, Feb. 2018.

J. Bai, B. Hu, H. Cao, and J. Zhou, “Uncertainty analysis method for EMC simulation based on the complex number method of moments,” PIER Letters, vol. 121, pp. 7-12, 2024.

Z. Fei, Y. Huang, J. Zhou, and Q. Xu, “Uncertainty quantification of crosstalk using stochastic reduced order models,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 228-239, Feb. 2017.

Z. Ren, J. Ma, Y. Qi, D. Zhang, and C.-S. Koh, “Managing uncertainties of permanent magnet synchronous machine by adaptive Kriging assisted weight index Monte Carlo simulation method,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 2162-2169, Dec. 2020.

P. Besnier, F. Delaporte, and T. Houret, “Extreme values and risk analysis: EMC design approach through metamodeling,” IEEE Electromagn. Compat. Mag., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 80-93, 2021.

T. Houret, P. Besnier, S. Vauchamp, and P. Pouliguen, “Controlled stratification based on Kriging surrogate model: An algorithm for determining extreme quantiles in electromagnetic compatibility risk analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 3837-3847, 2020.

H. Li, B. Zhu, and J. Chen, “Optimal design of photonic band-gap structure based on Kriging surrogate model,” PIER M, vol. 52, pp. 1-8, 2016.

S. Kasdorf, J. J. Harmon, and B. M. Notaroš, “Kriging methodology for uncertainty quantification in computational electromagnetics,” IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 474-486, Apr. 2024.

M. Sedaghat, R. Trinchero, Z. H. Firouzeh, and F. G. Canavero, “Compressed machine learning-based inverse model for design optimization of microwave components,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 3415-3427, July 2022.

S. Kushwaha, N. Soleimani, F. Treviso, R. Kumar, R. Trinchero, F. G. Canavero, S. Roy, and R. Sharma, “Comparative analysis of prior knowledge-based machine learning metamodels for modeling hybrid copper-graphene on-chip interconnects,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2249-2260, Dec. 2022.

F. J. Massey, “The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 46, no. 253, pp. 68-78, Mar. 1951.

J. Bai, Y. Wan, M. Li, G. Zhang, and X. He, “Reduction of random variables in EMC uncertainty simulation model,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 941-947, Sep. 2022.

J. Bai, J. Sun, and N. Wang, “Convergence determination of EMC uncertainty simulation based on the improved mean equivalent area method,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1446-1452, Nov. 2021.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

[1]
S. . Huo, Y. . Song, Q. . Liu, and J. . Bai, “Improving Kriging Surrogate Model for EMC Uncertainty Analysis Using LSSVR”, ACES Journal, vol. 39, no. 07, pp. 614–622, Jul. 2024.