Extended Network Parameters for Transmission Line Networks Subject to External Field Illumination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/2024.ACES.J.400408Keywords:
Black-box modeling, electromagnetic coupling, network parameters, transmission lineAbstract
Microwave network parameters are prevalently used in the modeling of transmission lines. It can characterize the interconnection of ports and is supported by most SPICE software. However, traditional microwave network parameters cannot characterize the role of external fields; this is a common concern in electromagnetic compatibility or electromagnetic interference analysis. In this paper, external excitation is treated as an additional port in the circuit. An extended network parameter is proposed to model the transmission lines excited by the external field. The extended network parameters can be used easily in the SPICE solver to analyze responses on linear or nonlinear loads. The proposed method is suitable for evaluating the electromagnetic interference of complex transmission line networks or PCBs, and it can use the advantages of circuit solvers for tuning or optimization with less computational burden.
Downloads
References
D. V. Giri, R. Hoad, and F. Sabath, “Implications of high-power electromagnetic (HPEM) environments on electronics,” IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 37-44, 2020.
W. A. Radasky and R. Hoad, “Recent developments in high power EM(HPEM) standards with emphasis on high altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) and intentional electromagnetic interference (IEMI),” IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 62-66, 2020.
R. Michels, M. Kreitlow, A. Bausen, C. Dietrich, and F. Gronwald, “Modeling and verification of a parasitic nonlinear energy storage effect due to high-power electromagnetic excitation,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2468-2475, 2020.
C. Pouant, J. Raoult, and P. Hoffmann, “Large domain validity of MOSFET microwave-rectification response,” in 2015 10th International Workshop on the Electromagnetic Compatibility of Integrated Circuits (EMC Compo), pp. 232-237, 10-13 Nov. 2015.
T. Dubois, J. J. Laurin, J. Raoult, and S. Jarrix, “Effect of low and high-power continuous wave electromagnetic interference on a microwave oscillator system: From VCO to PLL to QPSK receiver,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 286-293, 2014.
Y. Bayram, J. L. Volakis, S. K. Myoung, S. J. Doo, and P. Roblin, “High power EMI on RF amplifier and digital modulation schemes,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 849-860, 2008.
J. E. Baek, Y. M. Cho, and K. C. Ko, “Damage modeling of a low-noise amplifier in an RF front-end induced by a high-power electromagnetic pulse,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 798-804, 2017.
Q. S. Liang, C. C. Chai, H. Wu, Y. Q. Liu, F. X. Li, and Y. T. Yang, “Mechanism analysis and thermal damage prediction of high-power microwave radiated CMOS circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 444-451, 2021.
M. G. Backstrom and K. G. Lovstrand, “Susceptibility of electronic systems to high-power microwaves: Summary of test experience,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 396-403, 2004.
C. R. Paul, “Frequency response of multiconductor transmission lines illuminated by an electromagnetic field,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-18, no. 4, pp. 183-190, 1976.
F. Rachidi, “A review of field-to-transmission line coupling models with special emphasis to lightning-induced voltages on overhead lines,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 898-911, 2012.
Q. F. Liu, C. Ni, H. Q. Zhang, and W. Y. Yin, “Lumped-network FDTD method for simulating transient responses of RF amplifiers excited by intentional electromagnetic interference signals,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1512-1521, 2021.
W. Rui and J. Jian Ming, “Incorporation of multiport lumped networks into the hybrid time domain finite-element analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2030-2037, 2009.
X. Wang, A. Huang, W. Zhang, R. Yazdani, D.-H. Kim, and T. Enomoto, “Methodology for analyzing coupling mechanisms in RFI problems based on PEEC,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 761-769, 2023.
H. H. Zhang, L. J. Jiang, and H. M. Yao, “Embedding the behavior macromodel into TDIE for transient field-circuit simulations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 3233-3238, 2016.
T. Wendt, M. D. Stefano, C. Yang, S. Grivet-Talocia, and C. Schuster, “Iteration dependent waveform relaxation for hybrid field nonlinear circuit problems,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1124-1139, 2022.
T. Liang, G. Spadacini, F. Grassi, and S. A. Pignari, “Worst-case scenarios of radiated-susceptibility effects in a multiport system subject to intentional electromagnetic interference,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 76500-76512, 2019.
F. Vanhee, D. Pissoort, J. Catrysse, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, and G. G. E. Gielen, “Efficient reciprocity-based algorithm to predict worst case induced disturbances on multiconductor transmission lines due to incoming plane waves,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 208-216, 2013.
J. T. Williams, L. D. Bacon, M. J. Walker, and E. C. Zeek, “A robust approach for the analysis of EMI/EMC problems with nonlinear circuit loads,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 680-687, 2015.
A. Kalantarnia, A. Keshtkar, and A. Ghorbani, “Predicting the effects of HPEM radiation on a transmission line terminated with linear/nonlinear load in perforated metallic enclosure using FDDM/VF,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 669-675, 2020.
D. Winklestein, M. B. Steer, and R. Pomerleau, “Simulation of arbitrary transmission line networks with nonlinear terminations,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 418-422, 1991.
J. E. Schutt Aine and R. Mittra, “Scattering parameter transient analysis of transmission lines loaded with nonlinear terminations,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 529-536, 1988.
K. S. Kundert and A. Sangiovanni Vincentelli, “Simulation of nonlinear circuits in the frequency domain,” IEEE Transactions on Computer Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 521-535, 1986.
Y. Bayram and J. L. Volakis, “Hybrid S-parameters for transmission line networks with linear/nonlinear load terminations subject to arbitrary excitations,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 941-950, May 2007.
B. Gustavsen and A. Semlyen, “Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1052-1061, 1999.
B. Gustavsen, “Improving the pole relocating properties of vector fitting,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1587-1592, 2006.
B. Salarieh and H. M. J. De Silva, “Review and comparison of frequency-domain curve-fitting techniques: Vector fitting, frequency-partitioning fitting, matrix pencil method and loewner matrix,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 196, 2021.
B. Gustavsen and A. Semlyen, “Admittance-based modeling of transmission lines by a folded line equivalent,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 231-239, 2009.
A. Dounavis, R. Achar, and M. Nakhla, “A general class of passive macromodels for lossy multiconductor transmission lines,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1686-1696, 2001.
IEC 61000-2-9, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) – Part 2-9: Description of HEMP Environment — Radiated Disturbance, 1996.
J. Benford, J. A. Swegle, and E. Schamiloglu, High Power Microwaves. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2015.


