The Inversion Method Based on CNN-BiLSTM-Attention for SQUID TEM Data with IP Effect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/2026.ACES.J.410307Keywords:
Attention mechanism, BiLSTM, CNN, inversion method, polarizable medium, SQUID TEMAbstract
The superconducting quantum interference device time-domain electromagnetic (SQUID TEM) method has been widely used for the exploration of geological and mineral resources. Extracting resistivity and polarizability from TEM data aids in delineating subsurface metallic mineralization. However, traditional inversion methods are computationally intensive and slow. We propose an inversion method based on a convolutional neural network and bidirectional long short-term memory with attention (CNN-BiLSTM-Attention) to extract resistivity and polarizability of polarizable media from SQUID TEM data acquired with a magnetic source. The method combines the advantages of CNN for automatic feature extraction with the capabilities of BiLSTM for processing temporal data. Additionally, it incorporates an attention mechanism that emphasizes the extraction of key polarization features, thereby optimizing the parameters extraction process. The method can effectively extract resistivity and polarizability from SQUID TEM data. It is validated by the TEM data of theoretical models, and the errors of CNN-BiLSTM-Attention inversion results are smaller than that of the BiLSTM and CNN-LSTM methods.
Downloads
References
M. Radulescu, S. Dalal, U. K. Lilhore, and S. Saimiya, “Optimizing mineral identification for sustainable resource extraction through hybrid deep learning enabled FinTech model,” Resources Policy, vol. 89, Feb. 2024.
G. W. Hohmann, P. R. Kintzinger, G. D. Van Voorhis, and S. H. Ward, “Evaluation of the measurement of induced electrical polarization with an inductive system,” Geophysics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 901–915, Oct. 1970.
C. A. Moreira, K. Borssatto, L. M. Ilha, S. F. D. Santos, and F. T. G. Rosa, “Geophysical modeling in gold deposit through DC resistivity and induced polarization methods,” REM-International Engineering Journal, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 293–299, Sep. 2016.
J. Clarke and A. I. Braginski, The SQUID Handbook: Applications of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
C. Flores and S. A. Peralta-Ortega, “Induced polarization with in-loop transient electromagnetic soundings: A case study of mineral discrimination at El Arco porphyry copper, Mexico,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 423–436, July 2009.
I. Kumar, B. V. L. Kumar, S. N. S. Birua, J. K. Dash, and A. K. Chaturvedi, “Inductive induced polarization effect in transient electromagnetic surveys for mapping sulphide-rich zone: A case study from Gurulpada area, Singhbhum Shear Zone, Jharkhand,” Journal of Geophysics, vol. 38, no. 2, Apr. 2017.
T. Lee, “Sign reversals in the transient method of electrical prospecting (one-loop version),” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 653–662, Dec. 1975.
A. Viezzoli, V. Kaminski, and G. Fiandaca, “Modeling induced polarization effects in helicopter time domain electromagnetic data: Synthetic case studies,” Geophysics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. E31–E50, Feb. 2017.
K. F. Man, C. C. Yin, Y. H. Liu, X. Y. Ren, S. Y. Sun, J. J. Miao, and B. Xiong, “Inversion of timedomain airborne EM data with IP effect based on Pearson correlation constraints,” Applied Geophysics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 589–600, 2021.
J. T. Lu, X. B. Wang, Z. W. Xu, M. S. Zhdanov, M. Guo, M. Q. Teng, and Z. Liu, “Quasi-2-D robust inversion of semi-airborne transient electromagnetic data with IP effects,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 60, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2022.
X. Wang, J. Lu, M. Guo, S. Zhang, Q. Hu, and H. El-Kaliouby, “Inversion of induced polarizationaffected electrical-source transient electromagnetic data observed in the groundwater survey from eastern Tibet, China,” Geophysics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. B17–B28, Jan. 2025.
S. Yu and J. Ma, “Deep learning for geophysics: Current and future trends,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 59, no. 3, e2021RG000742, Sep. 2021.
T. J. Zhao, S. Wang, C. J. Ouyang, M. Chen, C. Y. Liu, J. Zhang, L. Yu, F. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives,” The Innovation, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 100691, Sep. 2024.
Y. J. Ji, Y. Q. Wu, Y. H. Wu, and Y. Zhang, “Excitation process under the ramp-step waveform of inductive source-induced polarization method,” Geophysics, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. E57–E65, Feb. 2020.
T. Alyousuf and Y. Li, “Inversion using adaptive physics-based neural network: Application to magnetotelluric inversion,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 1252–1272, Aug. 2022.
P. Li, M. L. Liu, M. Alfarraj, P. Tahmasebi, and D. Grana, “Probabilistic physics-informed neural network for seismic petrophysical inversion,” Geophysics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. M17–M32, Mar. 2024.
K. S. Cole and R. H. Cole, “Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics: Alternating current characteristics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 341–351, Apr. 1941.
M. N. Nabighian, “Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics,” in Investigations in Geophysics, no. 3. Tulsa, OK, USA: Society of Exploration Geophysics, pp. 1-2, 1988.
D. Guptasarma and B. Singh, “New digital linear filters for Hankel J0 and J1 transforms,” Geophys. Prospecting, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 745–762, Sep. 1997.
M. Seidel and B. Tezkan, “1D Cole-Cole inversion of TEM transients influenced by induced polarization,” J. Appl. Geophys., vol. 138, pp. 220–232, Mar. 2017.
L. Alzubaidi, J. L. Zhang, A. J. Humaidi, and L. Farhan, “Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions,” J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 53, Mar. 2021.
W. J. Lu, J. Z. Li, Y. F. Li, A. J. Sun, and J. Y. Wang, “A CNN-LSTM-based model to forecast stock prices,” Complexity, vol. 2020, no. 18, Nov. 2020.
L. Q. Shan, Y. C. Liu, M. Tang, M. Yang, and X. Y. Bai, “CNN-BiLSTM hybrid neural networks with attention mechanism for well log prediction,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 205, p. 108838, Oct. 2021.
D. Soydaner, “Attention mechanism in neural networks: Where it comes and where it goes,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 13371–13385, May 2022.
L. Huang, J. Qin, Y. Zhou, F. Zhu, L. Liu, and L. Shao, “Normalization techniques in training DNNs: Methodology, analysis and application,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 10173–10196, Feb. 2023.
S. L. Zhou and W. Song, “Deep learning-based roadway crack classification using laser-scanned range images: A comparative study on hyperparameter selection,” Autom. Constr., vol. 114, p. 103171, June 2020.
P. Baldi and P. Sadowski, “The dropout learning algorithm,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 210, pp. 78–122, May 2014.
M. Reyad, A. M. Sarhan, and M. Arafa, “A modified Adam algorithm for deep neural network optimization,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 17095–17112, Apr. 2023.
H. Ren, D Lei, Q. Y. Di, and R. Wang, “Data discrepancy constraints for 3D airborne transient electromagnetic inversion for induced polarization parameters,” Geophysics, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. E105–E116, May 2025.
H. Z. Cai, M. H. Liu, J. J. Zhou, J. H. Li, and X. Y. Hu, “Effective 3D-transient electromagnetic inversion using finite-element method with a parallel direct solver,” Geophysics, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. E377–E392, Nov. 2022.


