Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness Prediction of Stacked, Chassis Based on Snow Ablation Optimizer Algorithm
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.13052/2026.ACES.J.410109关键词:
Electromagnetic shielding, Robinson equivalent model, shielding effectiveness prediction, snow-ablation optimizer, stacked chassis摘要
Stacked chassis has wide application in aerospace integrated electronic systems. However, with irregular enclosure structure and multi-module integrated into small space, its electromagnetic shielding effectiveness (SE) prediction is a challenge problem. In this paper, a novel method of SE prediction for stacked chassis is proposed based on snow-ablation optimizer (SAO) algorithm. First, a dedicated model of stacked chassis is selected and the SE at five internal sampling points is obtained via full-wave numerical simulation. Then, building on the Robinson equivalent model combined with the generalized Baum-Liu-Tesche (BLT) equations, and exploiting the initial simulation data as priors, the characteristic parameters of the stacked chassis are achieved via the SAO algorithm. On this basis and under vertically polarized and normally incident plane wave, the SE is predicted at all the positions across the central axis normal to the incident face of the chassis. The prediction results enable identification of the optimal SE distribution along frequency axis inside the chassis, thereby informing the internal layout and placement of sensitive devices. The prediction curves agree well with the simulation results, which can overcome the large-error limitations of conventional analytical approaches for complex cavities.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
参考
J. E. Bridges, “Proposed recommended practices for the measurement of shielding effectiveness of high-performance shielding enclosures,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-10, pp. 82–94, 1968.
B. Jinjun, Z. Gang, and W. Lixin, “EMC simulation based on FDTD analysis considering uncertain inputs with arbitrary probability density,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 34, pp. 82–94, 2019.
A. Taflove, “Review of the formulation and applications of the finite-difference time-domain method for numerical modeling of electromagnetic wave interactions with arbitrary structures,” Wave Motion, vol. 10, pp. 547–582, 1988.
N. V. Kantartzis, “Multi-frequency higher-order Adi-FDTD solvers for signal integrity predictions and interference modeling in general EMC applications,” Wave Motion, vol. 25, pp. 1046–1060, 2010.
L. Avazpour, S. W. Belling, M. L. King, S. Schmidt, and I. Knezevic, “Field–potential finite-difference time-domain (FiPo FDTD) technique for computational electromagnetics,” Journal of Computational Electronics, vol. 24, p. 119, 2025.
J. Bai, G. Zhang, L. Wang, and T. Wang, “Uncertainty analysis in EMC simulation based on improved method of moments,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 31, pp. 66–71, 2016.
D. Omri, M. Aidi, and T. Aguili, “A comparison of three temporal basis functions for the time-domain method of moments (TD-MoM),” Journal of Computational Electronics, vol. 19, pp. 750–758, 2020.
J. Bai, B. Hu, H. Cao, and J. Zhou, “Uncertainty analysis method for EMC simulation based on the complex number method of moments,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 121, pp. 7–12, 2024.
W. J. R. Hoefer, “The transmission-line matrix method-theory and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 33, pp. 7–12, 1985.
P. Russer and J. A. Russer, “Application of the transmission line matrix (TLM) method to EMC problems,” in 2012 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 141–144, 2012.
N. S. Dončov, B. Milovanovic, and Z. Stanković, “Extension of compact TLM airvent model on rectangular and hexagonal apertures,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 26, pp. 64–72, 2011.
Z. Kubik and J. Skala, “Shielding effectiveness simulation of small perforated shielding enclosures using FEM,” Energies, vol. 9, p. 129, 2016.
F. Chao and S. Zhongxiang, “A hybrid FD-MoM technique for predicting shielding effectiveness of metallic enclosures with apertures,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 47, pp. 456–462, 2005.
M. Ranasinghe and V. Dinavahi, “Massively parallel hybrid TLM-PEEC solver and model order reduction for 3D nonlinear electromagnetic transient analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 67, pp. 667–678, 2025.
X. Q. Zheng, Z. Y. Huang, Y. Q. Liang, and H. Y. Duan, “Rapid calculation method of ultrathin dielectric layer shielding efficiency based on CNTD-FDTD method,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics (ICCEM), pp. 1–3, Apr. 2024.
R. Qi, Y. Ding, Y. Du, H. Cai, L. Jia, and X. Xiao, “Hybrid TDPEEC/FDTD method for lightning transient analysis in solar panels,” IEEJ Transactions on Electrical Electronic Engineering, vol. 17, p. 1, 2022.
X. He, M. Chen, and B. Wei, “A hybrid algorithm of 3-D explicit unconditionally stable FDTD and traditional FDTD methods,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 23, pp. 1–5, 2024.
A. A. Lodhi, Y. Zhu, and O. Gassab, “Improved hybrid FDTD method for complex thin wire structures inside enclosure for accurate differential-mode prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 67, pp. 1–13, 2025.
M. P. Robinson, “Analytical formulation for the shielding effectiveness of enclosures with apertures,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 40, pp. 240–248, 1998.
A. Rabat, P. Bonnet, K. E. K. Drissi, and S. Girard, “Analytical formulation for shielding effectiveness of a lossy enclosure containing apertures,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 60, pp. 1384–1392, 2018.
A. A. Ivanov, A. V. Demakov, M. E. Komnatnov, and T. R. Gazizov, “Semi-analytical approach for calculating shielding effectiveness of an enclosure with a filled aperture,” Electrica, vol. 22, 2022.
A. A. Ivanov, M. E. Komnatnov, and T. R. Gazizov, “Analytical model for evaluating shielding effectiveness of an enclosure populated with conducting plates,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 62, pp. 2307–2310, 2020.
A. Rabat, P. Bonnet, K. E. K. Drissi, and S. Girard, “An analytical evaluation of the shielding effectiveness of enclosures containing complex apertures,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 147191–147200, 2021.
J.-C. Zhou and X.-T. Wang, “An efficient method for predicting the shielding effectiveness of an apertured enclosure with an interior enclosure based on electromagnetic topology,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 37, pp. 1014–1020, 2022.
CST Studio Suite [Online]. Available: http://www.cst.com
Q. Li, S.-Y. Liu, and X.-S. Yang, “Influence of initialization on the performance of metaheuristic optimizers,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 91, p. 106193, 2020.
H. Su, D. Zhao, A. A. Heidari, L. Liu, X. Zhang, M. Mafarja, and H. Chen, “RIME: A physics-based optimization,” Neurocomputing, vol. 532, pp. 183–214, 2023.
L. Deng and S. Liu, “Snow ablation optimizer: A novel metaheuristic technique for numerical optimization and engineering design,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 225, p. 120069, 2023.
W. Chen, Z. Wang, Y. Yang, S. Wang, H. Wang, and Y. Ayaz, “Research on path planning of mobile robots based on snow ablation optimizer,” in 2024 43rd Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Kunming, China, pp. 4351–4356, 2024.


