Uncertainty Quantification of the Crosstalk in Multiconductor Transmission Lines via Degree Adaptive Stochastic Response Surface Method
Keywords:Crosstalk, degree adaptive, multiconductor transmission lines (MTLs), statistical property, stochastic response surface method
The degree adaptive stochastic response surface method is applied to analyze statistically the crosstalk in multiconductor transmission lines (MTLs). The coefficient of polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is obtained based on the least angle regression. The truncation degree of PCE is iterated using the degree adaptive truncation algorithm, and the optimal proxy model of the crosstalk of the original MTLs that satisfies the actual error requirements is calculated. The statistical properties of crosstalk in MTLs (such as mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and probability density distribution) are obtained. The failure probability of the electromagnetic compatibility in the MTLs system is considered. The global sensitivity indices of crosstalkrelated factors are analyzed. Finally, the proposed method is proved to be effective compared with the conventional Monte Carlo method. The uncertainty quantification of crosstalk in MTLs can be calculated efficiently and accurately.
V. Vulfin and R. Ianconescu, “Transmission of the maximum number of signals through a multiconductor transmission line without crosstalk or return loss: Theory and simulation,” IET Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 1444-1452, 2015.
R. Ianconescu and V. Vulfin, “Analysis of lossy multiconductor transmission lines and application of a crosstalk canceling algorithm,” IET Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 394-401, 2016.
S. Shiran, B. Reiser, and H. Cory, “A probabilistic method for the evaluation of coupling between transmission lines,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 387-393, Aug. 1993.
A. Ciccolella and F. G. Canavero, “Stochastic prediction of wire coupling interference,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 51-56, Aug. 1995.
B. Bellan, S. A. Pignari, and G. Spadacini, “Characterisation of crosstalk in terms of mean value and standard deviation,” IEE Proc.-Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 289-295, Nov. 2003.
M. Larbi, P. Besnier, and B. Pecqueux, “Probability of extreme interference levels computed from reliability approaches: Application to transmission lines with uncertain parameters,” Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compa., Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 648-655, 2014.
M. Larbi, P. Besnier, and B. Pecqueux, “Probability of EMC failure and sensitivity analysis with regard to uncertain variables by reliability methods,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compa., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 274-282, 2015.
L. Gao, Q. Yu, and D. C. Wu, “Probabilistic distribution modeling of crosstalk in multiconductor transmission lines via maximum entropy method,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 103650-103661, Aug. 2019.
M. Wu, D. G. Beetner, T. H. Hubing, H. Ke, and S. Sun, “Statistical prediction of ‘reasonable worstcase’ crosstalk in cable bundles,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 842-851, Aug. 2009.
M. S. Halligan and D. G. Beetner, “Maximum crosstalk estimation in lossless and homogeneous transmission lines,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1953-1961, Sep. 2014.
A. C. Yücel, H. Bagci, and E. Michielssen, “An ME-PC enhanced HDMR method for effificient statistical analysis of multiconductor transmission lines networks,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 685-696, May 2015.
I. S. Stievano, P. Manfredi, and F. G. Canavero, “Parameters variability effects on multiconductor interconnects via Hermite polynomial chaos,” IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag., Manuf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1234-1239, Aug. 2011.
D. Xiu, Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 2010.
P. Manfredi, D. V. Ginste, I. S. Stievano, D. De Zutter, and F. G. Canavero, “Stochastic transmission lines analysis via polynomial chaos methods: An 182 ACES JOURNAL, Vol. 36, No. 2, February 2021 overview,” IEEE Electromagn. Compat. Mag., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 77-84, 3rd Quart., 2017.
I. S. Stievano, P. Manfredi, and F. G. Canavero, “Stochastic analysis of multiconductor cables and interconnects,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 501-507, May 2011.
S. Isukapalli, “Uncertainty analysis of transporttransformation models,” Ph.D. dissertation, New Jersey, USA: Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 1999.
G. Blatman, “Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansions for uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis,” Ph.D. dissertation, Clermont Ferrand 2, 2009.
G. Blatman and B. Sudret, “Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 230, no. 6, pp. 2345-2367, 2011. [
S. Quicken, W. P. Donders, and E. M. J. V. Disseldorp, “Application of an adaptive polynomial chaos expansion on computationally expensive three-dimensional cardiovascular models for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis,” J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 121010, 2016.
F. Ni, P. Nguyen, and J. F. G. Cobben, “Basisadaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion for probabilistic power flow,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 99, pp.1-1, Jan 2017.
S. S. Isukapalli, A. Roy, and P. G. Georgopoulos, “Efficient sensitivity/uncertainty analysis using the combined stochastic response surface method and automated differentiation: Application to environmental and biological systems,” Risk Analysis, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 591-602, 2000.
D. Xiu and G. E. Karniadakis, “Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 137-167, 2003.
W. Schoutens, Stochastic Processes and Orthogonal Polynomials. Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 146, 2012.
M. Eldred, C. Webster, and P. Constantine, “Evaluation of non-intrusive approaches for wieneraskey generalized polynomial chaos,” in 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp. 1892, 2008.
M. D. McKay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code,” Technometrics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 55-61, 2000.
S. Hosder, R. Walters, and M. Balch, “Efficient sampling for non-intrusive polynomial chaos applications with multiple uncertain input variables,” in 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp.1939, 2007.
B. Efron, T. Hastie, and I. Johnstone, “Least angle regression,” Ann. Stat., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 407-451, 2004.
G. Blatman and B. Sudret, “An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis,” Probab. Eng. Eng. Mech., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 183-197, 2010.
M. Larbi, P. Besnier, and B. Pecqueux, “The adaptive controlled stratification method applied to the determination of extreme interference levels in EMC modeling with uncertain input variables,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 543-552, Apr. 2016.
C. R. Paul, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
C. R. Paul, Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines. 2nd ed., New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2008.