Optimization and Inverse-design Techniques for Metalens Synthesis

Authors

  • Sawyer D. Campbell Department of Electrical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA
  • Eric B. Whiting Department of Electrical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA
  • Ronald P. Jenkins Department of Electrical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA
  • Pingjuan L. Werner Department of Electrical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA
  • Douglas H. Werner Department of Electrical Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA

Keywords:

inverse-design, metamaterials, metasurfaces, nanoantennas, optimization

Abstract

Phase-gradient metasurfaces enable designers to tailor the behavior of electromagnetic waves at surfaces by exploiting the generalized form of Snell’s law. This ability has led to the investigation of metalenses which have the potential to significantly reduce the size, weight, and power (SWaP) of conventional optical systems. While traditional lenses are made from individual glasses, metalenses are comprised of patterned meta-atom unit cells which are arranged in such a way so as to give the metalens its desired behavior. Therefore, any metalens’s performance is ultimately determined by that of its underlying unit cell components. However, designing meta-atoms that simultaneously achieve high performance over wide frequency bandwidths and fields-of-view is an extremely challenging problem that is best addressed with powerful optimization and inverse-design techniques.

References

N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: Generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” Science, New Series, vol. 334, no. 6054, pp. 333-337, 2011.

M. Khorasaninejad, W. T. Chen, R. C. Devlin, J. Oh, A. Y. Zhu, and F. Capasso, “Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6290, pp. 1190-1194, June 2016.

H. Zuo, D.-Y. Choi, X. Gai, P. Ma, L. Xu, D. N. Neshev, B. Zhang, and B. Luther-Davies, “High-efficiency all-dielectric metalenses for midinfrared imaging,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 5, no. 23, p. 1700585, Dec. 2017.

D. Jia, Y. Tian, W. Ma, X. Gong, J. Yu, G. Zhao, and X. Yu, “Transmissive terahertz metalens with full phase control based on a dielectric metasurface,” Optics Letters, vol. 42, no. 21, p. 4494, Nov. 2017.

N. Yu and F. Capasso, “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,” Nat. Mater., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 139-150, Feb. 2014.

J. Nagar, S. D. Campbell, and D. H. Werner, “Apochromatic singlets enabled by metasurface-augmented GRIN lenses,” Optica, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 99-102, 2018.

S. D. Campbell, D. Sell, R. P. Jenkins, E. B. Whiting, J. A. Fan, and D. H. Werner, “Review of numerical optimization techniques for metadevice design [Invited],” Opt. Mater. Express, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1842- 1863, Apr. 2019.

S. D. Campbell, D. Z. Zhu, E. B. Whiting, J. Nagar, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Advanced multi-objective and surrogate-assisted optimization of topologically diverse metasurface architectures,” in Metamaterials, Metadevices, and Metasystems 2018, vol. 10719, p. 107190U.

S. D. Campbell, E. B. Whiting, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “High-Performance Metasurfaces Synthesized via Multi-Objective Optimization,” in 2019 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES), pp. 1-2.

D. Sell, J. Yang, S. Doshay, and J. A. Fan, “Periodic dielectric metasurfaces with high-efficiency, multiwavelength functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 5, no. 23, p. 1700645, Dec. 2017.

A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, and A. Faraon, “Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 937-943, Nov. 2015.

N. Hansen, S. D. Müller, and P. Koumoutsakos, “Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES),” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-18, Mar. 2003.

M. D. Gregory, Z. Bayraktar, and D. H. Werner, “Fast Optimization of Electromagnetic Design Problems Using the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategy,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1275-1285, Apr. 2011.

D. Hadka and P. Reed, “Borg: An auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing Framework,” Evol. Comput., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 231-259, May 2013.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-07

Issue

Section

Articles