Quantifying Sub-gridding Errors in Standard and Hybrid Higher Order 2D FDTD Simulations
Keywords:Finite-difference time-domain method, high order FDTD, numerical error analysis, sub-gridding
Sub-gridding errors for a 2D Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) simulation are compared for both the standard FDTD and Hybrid higher order FDTD cases. Subgridding contrast ratios of 1:3, 1:9, 1:15, and 1:27 are considered and analyzed. A correlation is seen between the increase of contrast ratio with the increase of sub-gridding errors for both standard and hybrid cases. However, a trend of errors reduction when using hybrid formulations over standard formulations is apparent for each contrast ratio.
A. Z. Elsherbeni and V. Demir, The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for Electromagnetics with MATLAB® Simulations, 2nd edition, Edison, New Jersey: SciTech Publishing, 2015.
M. W. Chevalier, R. J. Luebbers, and V. P. Cable, “FDTD local grid with material traverse,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 45, no. 3, Mar. 1997.
S. Wang, “Numerical examinations of the stability of FDTD subgridding schemes,” ACES Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, July 2007.
F. L. Teixeira, “A summary review on 25 years of progress and future challenges in FDTD and FETD techniques,” ACES Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, Jan. 2010.
M. F. Hadi and R. K. Dib, “Eliminating interface reflections in hybrid low-dispersion FDTD algorithms,” ACES Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, Nov. 2007.
J. Nehrbass and R. Lee, “Optimal finite-difference sub-gridding techniques applied to the Helmholtz equation,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 976-984, June 2000.
M. Le, M. Hadi, and A. Elsherbeni, “Quantifying Sub-gridding Errors when Modeling Multiscale Structures with FDTD,” 2019 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES), Miami, FL, USA, pp. 1-2, 2019.