A Method Using Magnetic Eddy Current Testing for Distinguishing ID and OD Defects of Pipelines under Saturation Magnetization
Keywords:
Impedance measurement, inside and outside defects, magnetic eddy current testing, the defect impedance angleAbstract
Distinguishing the inside (ID) and outside (OD) defect is an essential problem for the oil and gas pipeline nondestructive testing in engineering. The most widely used solution is to combine a magnetic flux leakage (MFL) section and a second section. For the strong magnetic field environment of the MFL, the second section and the MFL section are usually located at different mechanical positions, which leads to an increase in the length of the pipeline inspection gauge (PIG) and a decrease in the reliability. In this paper, a new impedance measurement method and the concept of the defect impedance angle are proposed to distinguish the ID and OD defects of pipelines under saturation magnetization, which based on the magnetic eddy current testing (MECT). The proposed ID & OD detection method can work with the MFL in the same mechanical position. Meanwhile, the proposed method also has the advantage that the discrimination criteria of the ID and OD defect keeps consistent with the classic eddy current testing (ECT). Furthermore, the robustness and sensitivity of the proposed method are discussed and verified by physical experiments.
Downloads
References
J. Feng, F. Li, S. Lu, J. Liu, and D. Ma, “Injurious or non-injurious defect identification from MFL images in pipeline inspection using convolutional neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, pp. 1-10, 2017.
X. Chen, Z. Wu, W. Chen, R. Kang, X. He, and Y. Miao, “Selection of key indicators for reputation loss in oil and gas pipeline failure event,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 99, pp. 69-84, 2019.
J. Zhou, J. Peng, G. Liang, and T. Deng, “Layout optimization of tree-tree gas pipeline network,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 173, pp. 666-680, 2019.
A. Cosham, P. Hopkins, and K. A. Macdonald, “Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines–Corrosion,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1245-1265, 2007.
J. Yin, M. Lu, and D. Pineda, “Full-signature realtime corrosion detection of underground casing pipes,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and 1096 ACES JOURNAL, Vol. 35, No. 9, September 2020 Measurement, vol. 49, pp. 120-128, 2000.
R. Palanisamy and W. Lord, “Prediction of eddy current probe signal trajectories,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1083-1085, 1980.
T. Beuker and B. Brown, “Monitoring of top of line corrosion with eddy current technology combined with magnetic flux leakage method,” Corrosion 2010 NACE International, 2010.
D. Mukherjee, S. G. Manral, S. Chand, S. Dhage, S. Bahuguna, S. Saha, S. K. Lahiri, S. Mukhopadhyay, and A. Kumar, “Development of secondary sensor system based on eddy current technology for inline inspection tool,” Barc Newsletter, 2013.
W. T. Peter and X. Wang, “Characterization of pipeline defect in guided-waves based inspection through matching pursuit with the optimized dictionary,” NDT & E International, vol. 54, pp. 171-182, 2013.
Z. Wang, S. Huang, Q. Wang, S. Wang, and W. Zhao, “Time of flight extraction of dispersive Lamb wave by ridge analysis,” In 2018 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium-China (ACES), IEEE, pp. 1-2, 2018.
S. Bagavathiappan, B. B. Lahiri, T. Saravanan, J. Philip, and T. Jayakumar, “Infrared thermography for condition monitoring - A review,” Infrared Physics & Technology, vol. 60, no. 60, pp. 35-55, 2013.
J. Chen, “3-D defect profile reconstruction from magnetic flux leakage signals in pipeline inspection using a hybrid inversion method,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 268-274, 2017.
Y. Shi, C. Zhang, R. Li, M. Cai, and G. Jia, “Theory and application of magnetic flux leakage pipeline detection,” Sensors, vol. 15, pp. 31036- 31055, 2015.
M. Yilai and L. Li, “Research on internal and external defect identification of drill pipe based on weak magnetic inspection,” Insight: NonDestructive Testing & Condition Monitoring, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 31-34, 2014.
D.-K. Kim, H.-R. Yoo, S.-H. Cho, S.-J. Koo, D.-K. Kim, J.-S. Yoo, and Y.-W. Rho, “Inspection of unpiggable natural gas pipelines using in-pipe robot,” International Conference on Advanced Engineering Theory and Applications, pp. 364- 373, 2016.
H. Schempf, E. Mutschler, A. Gavaert, G. Skoptsov, and W. Crowley, “Visual and nondestructive evaluation inspection of live gas mains using the Explorer™ family of pipe robots,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 217- 249, 2010.
A. Teitsma, “Remote field eddy current inspection of unpiggable pipelines,” Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 2004.
Y. Sun, Y. Kang, and C. Qiu, “A permanent magnetic perturbation testing sensor,” Sensors & Actuators A: Physical, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 226-232, 2009.
Y. Sun, Y. Kang, and C. Qiu, “A new NDT method based on permanent magnetic field perturbation,” NDT & E International, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2011.
S. Liu, Y. Sun, M. Gu, C. Liu, L. He, and Y. Kang, “Review and analysis of three representative electromagnetic NDT methods,” Insight, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 175-183, 2017.
B. Liu, Y. Cao, H. Zhang, Y. R. Lin, W. R. Sun, and B. Xu, “Weak magnetic flux leakage: A possible method for studying pipeline defects located either inside or outside the structures,” NDT & E International, vol. 74, pp. 81-86, 2015.
V. Babbar and L. Clapham, “Residual magnetic flux leakage: a possible tool for studying pipeline defects,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 117-125, 2003.
X. Ren and S. Liu, “Experimental study of phase sensitive detection technique in ECT system,” In 2014 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 121- 125, 2014.
D. L. Birx and S. J. Pipenberg, “A complex mapping network for phase sensitive classification,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 127-135, 1993.
L. S. Obrutsky, V. S. Cecco, S. P. Sullivan, and D. Humphrey, “Transmit receive eddy current probes for circumferential cracks in heat exchanger tubes,” Materials Evaluation, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 93-98, 1996.
F. Lingvall and T. Stepinski, “Automatic detecting and classifying defects during eddy current inspection of riveted lap-joints,” NDT & E International, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 47-55, 2000.
J. M. Prince and B. P. Hildebrand, “Low-frequency electromagnetic (eddy-current) holography for imaging in conductors,” Applied Optics, vol. 32, no. 26, pp. 4960-4971, 1993.
B. Helifa, M. Féliachi, I. K. Lefkaier, B. Fouad, A. Zaoui, and N. Lagraa, “Characterization of surface cracks using eddy current NDT simulation by 3DFEM and inversion by neural network,” In Workshop Problem, vol. 15, pp. 10, 2016.
H. A. Sabbagh, R. K. Murphy, E. H. Sabbagh, J. Aldrin, J. Knopp, and M. Blodgett, “Computational electromagnetics and model-based inversion: A modern paradigm for eddy-current nondestructive evaluation,” Applied Computational ElectromagLONG, HUANG, ZHENG, WANG, ZHAO: MAGNETIC EDDY CURRENT TESTING FOR DISTINGUISHING DEFECTS OF PIPELINES 1097 netics Society Journal, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 533-540, 2009.
Y. Long, S. Huang, J. Yu, W. Zhao, and S. Wang, “A method of distinguishing the ID and OD defect of the pipe under saturation magnetization,” 2018 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium - China (ACES), pp. 1-2, 2018.
D. H. Hur, M. S. Choi, H.-S. Shim, D. H. Lee, and O. Yoo, “Influence of signal-to-noise ratio on eddy current signals of cracks in steam generator tubes,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 883-888, 2014.
G. Rubinacci, A. Tamburrino, and S. Ventre, “Eddy current imaging of surface breaking defects by using monotonicity based methods,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 46-52, 2008.