EMC Simulation Based on FDTD Analysis Considering Uncertain Inputs with Arbitrary Probability Density
Keywords:
Arbitrary probability density, EMC simulation, FDTD analysis, stochastic Galerkin method, uncertainty analysisAbstract
Stochastic Galerkin Method, a prevailing uncertainty analysis method, has been successfully used in today’s EMC simulation, in order to consider nonideality and unpredictability in actual circumstance. In this case, the inputs of the simulation are no longer certain values, but random variables with corresponding probability density distribution. This paper focuses on the arbitrary probability density cases at inputs. Two constructing orthogonal basis methods, the Wiener Haar expansion and the Stieltjes procedure, are generalized into the Stochastic Galerkin Method which is combined with the Finite Difference Time Domain analysis. With the help of the Feature Selective Validation, the quantitative precision comparison of the proposed methods in different cases (the probability density function is continuous or discontinuous) can be presented in detail.
Downloads
References
N. V. Kantartzis, “Multi-frequency higher-order ADI-FDTD solvers for signal integrity predictions and interference modeling in general EMC applications,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1046-1060, 2010.
R. I. Macpherson and N. J. Ryan, “Reducing electromagnetic coupling in shielded enclosures using a genetic algorithm - Finite-difference timedomain solver,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 144- 150, 2003.
C. Jullien, et al., “Advanced modeling of crosstalk between an unshielded twisted pair cable and an unshielded wire above a ground plane,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 183-194, 2013.
G. Spadacini and S. A. Pignari, “Numerical assessment of radiated susceptibility of twistedwire pairs with random nonuniform twisting,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 956-964, 2013.
B. Jinjun, Z. Gang, W. Lixin, and A. Duffy, “Uncertainty analysis in EMC simulation based on stochastic collocation method,” 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 930-934, 2015.
J. J. Bai, et al., “Uncertainty analysis in EMC simulation based on improved method of moments,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 66-71, 2016.
Z. Zubac, D. De Zutter, and D. Vande Ginste, “Scattering from two-dimensional objects of varying shape combining the method of moments with the stochastic Galerkin method,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 4852-4856, 2014.
R. S. Edwards, A. C. Marvin, and S. J. Porter, “Uncertainty analyses in the finite-difference timedomain method,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 155- 163, 2010.
X. L. Wan and G. E. M. Karniadakis, “Multielement generalized polynomial chaos for arbitrary probability measures,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 901-928, 2006.
O. P. Le Maı̂tre, et al., “Uncertainty propagation using Wiener–Haar expansions,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 28-57, 2004.
D. Xiu and G. Em Karniadakis, “The WienerAskey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 619-644, 2002.
R. S. Edwards, “Uncertainty Analyses in Computational Electromagnetism,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of York, 2009.
IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations. IEEE STD 15971-2008, pp. 1-41, 2008.
IEEE Recommended Practice for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations. IEEE STD 15972-2010, pp. 1-124, 2011.
