3-D Defect Profile Reconstruction from Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals in Pipeline Inspection Using a Hybrid Inversion Method

Authors

  • Junjie Chen Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute, Beijing, 100120, China

Keywords:

Defect reconstruction, genetic algorithm, magnetic flux leakage, neural network, pipeline inspection

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a hybrid inversion approach to reconstruct the profile of arbitrary threedimensional (3-D) defect from magnetic flux leakage (MFL) signals in pipeline inspection. The region of pipe wall immediately around the defect is represented by an array of partial cylinder cells, and a reduced forward FE model is developed to predict MFL signals for any given defect. The neural network (NN) method is used at first to give a coarse prediction of the defect profile, and the prediction is then utilized as one original solution of the genetic algorithm (GA) to search for the global optimum estimate of the defect profile. To demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed inversion technique, we reconstruct defects from both simulated and experimental MFL signals. In both cases, reconstruction results indicate that the hybrid inversion method is rather effective in view of both efficiency and accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Khodayari-Rostamabad, J. P. Reilly, N. K. Nikolova, et al., “Machine learning techniques for the analysis of magnetic flux leakage images in pipeline inspection,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 3073-3084, 2009.

M. Ravan, R. K. Amineh, S. Koziel, et al., “Sizing of 3-D arbitrary defects using magnetic flux leakage measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1024-1033, 2010.

P. Ramuhalli, L. Udpa, and S. S. Udpa, “Electromagnetic NDE signal inversion by functionapproximation neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3633- 3642, 2002.

A. Joshi, “Wavelet transform and neural network based 3D defect characterization using magnetic flux leakage,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 149-153, 2008.

S. R. H. Hoole, S. Subramaniam, R. Saldanha, et al., “Inverse problem methodology and finite elements in the identification of cracks, sources, materials, and their geometry in inaccessible locations,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 3433-3443, 1991.

R. Priewald, C. Magele, P. Ledger, et al., “Fast magnetic flux leakage signal inversion for the reconstruction of arbitrary defect profiles in steel using finite elements,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 506-516, 2013.

K. C. Hari, M. Nabi, and S. V. Kulkarni, “Improved FEM model for defect-shape construction from MFL signal by using genetic algorithm,” Science, Measurement & Technology, IET, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 196-200, 2007.

M. Yan, S. Udpa, S. Mandayam, et al., “Solution of inverse problems in electromagnetic NDE using finite element methods,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 2924-2927, 1998.

A. A. Adly and S. K. Abd-El-Hafiz, “Utilizing particle swarm optimization in the field computation of non-linear magnetic media,” ACES Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 202-209, 2003.

J. Chen, S. Huang, and W. Zhao, “Threedimensional defect reconstruction from magnetic flux leakage signals in pipeline inspection based on a dynamic taboo search procedure,” InsightNon-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 535-540, 2014.

P. S. Kildal and A. Kishk, “EM modeling of surfaces with STOP or GO characteristicsartificial magnetic conductors and soft and hard surfaces,” ACES Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-40, 2003.

M. M. Bibby and F. P. Andrew, “High accuracy calculation of the magnetic vector potential on surfaces,” ACES Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 12-22, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-05

How to Cite

[1]
Junjie Chen, “3-D Defect Profile Reconstruction from Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals in Pipeline Inspection Using a Hybrid Inversion Method”, ACES Journal, vol. 32, no. 03, pp. 268–274, Aug. 2021.

Issue

Section

General Submission