Multi-inspection time optimisation for a cracked component based on a updating reliability approach

Authors

  • M. Eltaief Laboratoire de Génie Mécanique, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Monastir, Université de Monastir, Avenue Ibn El Jazzar, Monastir 5019, Tunisia; Institut Supérieur Des Etudes Technologique de Sousse, Cité Erriadh Sousse 4023, Tunisia;
  • T. Hassine Laboratoire de Génie Mécanique, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Monastir, Université de Monastir, Avenue Ibn El Jazzar, Monastir 5019, Tunisia
  • Ch. Bouraoui Laboratoire de Génie Mécanique, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Monastir, Université de Monastir, Avenue Ibn El Jazzar, Monastir 5019, Tunisia
  • A. Chateauneuf Polytech’ Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise Pascal, EA 3867, LaMI, BP 10448, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, France

Keywords:

fatigue crack growth, inspection scheduling, updating reliability, Firstorder reliability method, response surface, optimisation

Abstract

It is well acknowledged that Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG) process is one of the main processes that can produce failure of structures and mechanical components. To ensure the survival of these components a maintenance inspection schedule is needed. The aim of this study is to develop a predicting inspection time model for structural FCG life based on updating reliability analysis. The proposed approach takes into account the additional information generated by the previous inspection results. First-order reliability method and surface response method are used to evaluate the reliability. The uncertainties such as material parameters and geometrical parameters that affect the lifespan of the structure were regarded as random variables. Updating reliability assessment based on Bayesian approach was introduced to determine the updating inspection time for target reliability. Moreover, the proposed approach leads to determine the optimal inspection time strategy based on an economic study under the minimal total inspection and detecting costs using a dynamic method. The optimal inspection time for a single and two inspections was determined. A generalisation of this method is carried out for the case of multiple inspections. In order to illustrate and validate this method two applications are carried out: the first one is applied to the crack growth in mode I, and the second one is applied to the crack growth in mixed mode. The results of these applications are in good agreement with the physical results and show that the proposed method is proved to be feasible and applicable in the general complex fatigue loading and able to give accurate updating framework for scheduling inspections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, M. J., & Descamps, B. (1999). Reliability-based methods in the inspection planning of

fixed offshore steel structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 52, 117–131.

M. Eltaief et al.

Bea, J. A., Doblaré, M., & Gracia, L. (1999). Evaluation of the probability distribution of crack

propagation life in metal fatigue by means of probabilistic finite element method and B-models.

Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 63, 675–711.

Besterfield, G. H., Liu, W. K., Lawrence, M. A., & Belytschko, T. (1991). Fatigue crack growth

reliability by probabilistic finite elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,

, 297–320.

Cavallini, G., & Lazzeri, R. (2007, December). A probabilistic approach to fatigue risk assessment

in aerospace components. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 74, 2964–2970.

Chan, S. K., Tuba, I. S., & Wilson, W. K. (1970). On the finite element method in linear fracture

mechanics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2(1), 1–17.

Destuynder, Ph., Djoua, M., & Lescure, S. (1983). Quelques remarques sur la mécanique de la

rupture élastique [Some remarks on the mechanics of elastic fracture]. Journal of Theoretical

And Applied Mechanics, 2, 113–135.

Ditlevsen, O., & Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability method. New York: John Wiley and

Sons.

Erdogan, F., & Sih, G. C. (1963). On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse

shear. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85, 519–527.

Fourlaris, G., Ellwood, R., & Jones, T. B. (2007). The reliability of test results from simple test

samples in predicting the fatigue performance of automotive components. Materials &

Design, 28, 1198–1210.

Gdoutos, E. E. (2005). Fracture mechanics an introduction (2nd ed.). ISBN 1-4020-3153-X

(e-book) Published by Springer.

Ghonem, H., & Dore, S. (1987). Experimental study of the constant probability crack growth

curves under constant amplitude loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 27, 1–25.

Guinea, G. V., Planas, J., & Eliccs, M. (2000). KI evaluation by the displacement extrapolation

technique. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 66, 1–17.

Han, P. H. (1999). Inspection and maintenance planning of pipeline under external corrosion considering

generation of new defects. Structural Safety, 21, 203–222.

Hasofer, A. M., & Lind, N. C. (1974). Exact and invariant second moment code format. Journal

of Engineering Mechanics, 100, 111–121.

Jiao, G., & Moan, T. (1990). Methods of reliability model updating through additional events.

Structural Safety, 9, 139–153.

Khaleel, M. A., & Simonen, F. A. (2000). Effects of alternative inspection strategies on piping

reliability. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 197, 115–140.

Kulkarni, S. S., & Achenbach, J. D. (2007). Optimization of inspection schedule for a surfacebreaking

crack subject to fatigue loading. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 22, 301–312.

Laggoune R., Chateauneuf A., & Aissani D. (2009). Opportunistic policy for optimal preventive

maintenance of a multi-component system in continuous operating units. Computers & Chemical

Engineering, 33, 1499–1510.

Lemaire, M., Chateauneuf, A., & Mitteau, J. C. (2005). Fiabilité des structures: couplage mécanofiabiliste

statique. Paris: Edit. Hermes. 620.004 52 LEM.

Leonel, E. D., Chateauneuf, A., Venturini, W. S., & Bressolette, P. (2010, November). Coupled

reliability and boundary element model for probabilistic fatigue life assessment in mixed

mode crack propagation. International Journal of Fatigue, 32, 1823–1834.

Liu, W. K., Chen, Y., Belytschko, T., & Lua, Y. J. (1996). Three reliability methods for fatigue

crack growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 53, 733–752.

Lua, Y. J., Liu, W. K., & Belytschko, T. (1992). A stochastic damage model for the rupture prediction

of a multi-phase solid. Part II: Statistical approach. International Journal of Fracture

Mechanics, 55, 341–361.

Meng, G., Li, F., Sha, L., & Zhou, Z. (2007). Prediction of optimal inspection time for structural

fatigue life. International Journal of Fatigue, 29, 1516–1522.

Myötyri, E., Pulkkienen, U., & Simola, K. (2006). Application of stochastic filtering for lifetime

prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91, 200–208.

Nechval, N., Nechval, K., Purgailis, M., & Strelchonok, V. (2011, May). Planning inspections in

the case of damage tolerance approach to service of fatigued aircraft structures. International

Journal of Performability Engineering, 7, 279–290.

Newby, M. J. (1987). Markov models for fatigue crack growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,

, 477–482.Papadopoulos, I. V., Davol, P., Gorla, C., Filippini, M., & Bernasconi, A. (1997). A comparative

study of multi-axial high cycle fatigue criteria of metals. International Journal of Fatigue, 19,

–235.

Paris, P. C., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic

Engineering, 85, 528–534.

Parks, M. D. (1974). A stiffness derivative finite element technique of crack tip stress intensity

factors. International Journal of Fracture, 10, 243–255.

Rackwitz, R., & Fiessler, B. (1978). Structural reliability under combined load sequences. Computers

& Structures, 9, 489–494.

Riahi, H., Bressolette, Ph., Chateauneuf, A., Bouraoui, Ch., & Fathallah, R. (2011). Reliability

analysis and inspection updating by stochastic response surface of fatigue cracks in mixed

mode. Engineering Structures, 33, 3392–3401.

Ben Sghaier, R., Bouraoui, Ch., Fathallah, R., & Hassine, T. (2007). Probabilistic high cycle fatigue

behaviour prediction based on global approach criteria. International Journal of Fatigue,

, 209–221.

Shen, M. (1999). Reliability assessment of high cycle fatigue design of gas turbine blades using

the probabilistic Goodman Diagram. International Journal of Fatigue, 21, 699–708.

Straub, D., & Faber, M. H. (2005). Risked based inspection planning for structural systems.

Structure Safety, 27, 335–355.

Tanaka, H., & Toyoda-Makino, M. (1998). Cost-based optimal relation between inspection time

and assessment time for random fatigue crack growth. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics,

, 69–76.

Webster, G. A., & Ezeilo, A. N. (2001). Residual stress distributions and their influence on fatigue

lifetimes. International Journal of Fatigue, 23, S375–S383.

Wirsching, P. H. (1980). Fatigue reliability in welded joints of offshore structures. International

Journal of Fatigue, 2, 77–83.

Wu, W. F., & Ni, C. C. (2007). Statistical aspects of some fatigue crack growth data. Engineering

Fracture Mechanics, 74, 2952–2963.

Yu, L., Purnendu, K. D., & Zheng, Y. (2009). A response surface approach to fatigue reliability

of ship structures. Ships and Offshore Structures, 4, 253–259.

Yuan H. C. (2007, April). Fatigue analysis of welded joints with the aid of real three-dimensional

weld toe geometry. International Journal of Fatigue, 29, 772–785.

Zhao, Y. G., & Ono, T. (2001). Oment for structural reliability. Structural Safety, 23, 47–75.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-01

How to Cite

M. Eltaief, T. Hassine, Ch. Bouraoui, & A. Chateauneuf. (2013). Multi-inspection time optimisation for a cracked component based on a updating reliability approach. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 22(2-4), 132–156. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/EJCM/article/view/1401

Issue

Section

Original Article