Investigating Branched Cut-off Wall Effect on Seepage Using Numerical Modelling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.3334Keywords:
Seepage, cut-off wall, numerical analysis, upliftAbstract
In this research, numerical modelling has been conducted to expand on existing research on cut-off walls mainly done by, [2] and [8]. This study is aimed at examining a unique geometric alignment that accommodates ‘branches’ on either side of a vertical 12-metre-deep cut-off wall and investigates the subsequent effect on seepage (discharge) and uplift force within the foundation of the dam. From the study conducted it had been observed that seepage was reduced with the inclusion of these branches whilst the cut-off wall was located at the centre base of a concrete dam. Subsequent testing of altering the branches’ angle presented a further reduction in seepage through the soil strata, with the optimum angle being around the range of 60–70 degrees. Further experimentation had shown that altering the position at two other distinct locations (dam’s heel and toe) has had a significant reduction in seepage with the heel being the most effective at reducing it. Uplift pressure has been evaluated to show that the best position for minimal uplift force is at the heel of the dam.
Downloads
References
Abhilasha P. S., and Balan, T. A. (2014). Numerical analysis of seepage in Embankment dams. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 4, 13–23.
Angelov, M., and Asr, A. A. (2021). The effect of cut-off wall angle on seepage and uplift pressure under dams (Version 1). Loughborough University. https:/doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.14587398.v1.
Bayat, M., Eslamian, S., Shams, G., and Hajiannia, A. (2019). The 3D analysis and estimation of transient seepage in earth dams through PLAXIS 3D software: neural network. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78(18), 1–. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8405-y.
Bentley (2021), 1D/2D/3D Saturated/Unsaturated Finite Element Groundwater Seepage Modeling - Verification Manual. https:/communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/w/wiki/52921/manuals---plaxis-le.
Cedergren, H. R. (1977). Seepage, drainage, and flow nets (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Das, B. M. (1990). Principles of foundation engineering (2nd ed.). PWS-Kent Pub.
Harr, M. E. (1991). Groundwater and seepage. Courier Corporation.
Mansuri, B., Salmasi, F., and Oghati, B. (2014). Effect of location and angle of cutoff wall on uplift pressure in diversion dam. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 32(5), 1165–1173.
McCarthy, D. F. (2002). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Refaiy, A. R., AboulAtta, N. M., Saad, N. Y., and El-Molla, D. A. (2021). Modeling the effect of downstream drain geometry on seepage through earth dams. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 2511–2531.
Sedghi-Asl, M., Rahimi, H., and Khaleghi, H. (2009). Experimental analysis of seepage flow under coastal dikes. Experimental Techniques, 34(4), 49–54. https:/doi.org/10.1111/J.1747-1567.2009.00562.X.
Sivakumar, S., Begum, N. A., and Premalatha, P. V. (2019). Deformation analysis of suspended type cut off wall of diversion structures. Heliyon, 5(8), Article e02213.
Smith, M. J. (1981). Soil mechanics (4th ed.). Godwin.
Sowers, G. F. (George F., and Sowers, G. B. (1979). Introductory soil mechanics and foundations: geotechnical engineering. (4th ed.). Macmillan.
Venkatesh, K., and Karumanchi, S. R. (2016). Distribution of pore water pressure in an earthen dam considering unsaturated-saturated seepage analysis. 3rd European Conference on Unsaturated Soils., 9, Article 19004. https:/doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160919004.
Zhang, L., Yang, H., Sun, H., and Yang, Z. (2020). Optimization analysis of seepage control design in Mopanshan Reservoir, northeastern China. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13(7). https:/doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05283-0.
