The Influence of Spatially Varying Boundary Conditions Based on Material Heterogeneity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.3331Keywords:
Heterogeneous boundary conditions, finite element methods, unsaturated soils, random field, spatial variabilityAbstract
When conducting numerical analyses, boundary conditions are generally applied homogeneously, neglecting the inherent heterogeneity of the material being represented. Whilst the heterogeneity is often considered within the medium, its influence on the response at the boundary should also be accounted for. In this study, A novel approach to applying heterogeneous boundary conditions in the simulation of physical systems is presented, particularly focusing on moisture transport in unsaturated soils. The proposed method divides the surface into blocks or “macro-elements” and scales the boundary conditions based on the variation of material properties within these blocks. The principle of using overlapping kernel functions allows local effects to be considered, impacting neighbouring regions. To demonstrate the efficacy of the approach, a set of analyses were conducted that considered infiltration into a body of unsaturated soil, with various configurations of material properties and boundary conditions. The numerical simulations indicate that the application of scaled boundary conditions leads to a more natural and realistic response in the system. The applied method is independent on the numerical techniques employed in the simulation process, making it adaptable to existing computational codes, offering flexibility in capturing complex behaviours, and providing insights into how heterogeneity influences the system’s overall response.
Downloads
References
Bolin, D. and Kirchner, K. 2020. The Rational SPDE Approach for Gaussian Random Fields With General Smoothness. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 29(2), pp. 274–285. doi: nolinkurl10.1080/10618600.2019.1665537.
Brune, P., Duan, J. and Schmalfuß, B. 2009. Random Dynamics of the Boussinesq System with Dynamical Boundary Conditions. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 27(5), pp. 1096–1116. doi: nolinkurl10.1080/07362990902976546.
Cerrai, S. and Freidlin, M. 2011. Fast transport asymptotics for stochastic RDEs with boundary noise. The Annals of Probability 39(1). doi: nolinkurl10.1214/10-AOP552.
Chitez, A.S. and Jefferson, A.D. 2015. Porosity development in a thermo-hygral finite element model for cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research 78, pp. 216–233. doi: nolinkurl10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.07.010.
Cleall, P.J., Seetharam, S.C. and Thomas, H.R. 2007. Inclusion of Some Aspects of Chemical Behavior of Unsaturated Soil in Thermo/Hydro/Chemical/Mechanical Models. I: Model Development. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 133(3), pp. 338–347. Available at: https:/ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9399%282007%29133%3A3%28338%29.
Darcy, H. 1856. Les fontaines publiques de la vile de Dijon. Paris, Dalmont.
Fuglstad, G.-A., Lindgren, F., Simpson, D. and Rue, H. 2013. Exploring a New Class of Non-stationary Spatial Gaussian Random Fields with Varying Local Anisotropy.
Guo, J., Veran-Tissoires, S. and Quintard, M. 2016. Effective surface and boundary conditions for heterogeneous surfaces with mixed boundary conditions. Journal of Computational Physics 305, pp. 942–963. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.050.
Lasanen, S. 2002. Discretizations of Generalized Random Variables with Applications to Inverse Problems.
Lindgren, F., Rue, H. and Lindström, J. 2011. An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach.
Liu, W.F. and Leung, Y.F. 2018. Characterising three-dimensional anisotropic spatial correlation of soil properties through in situ test results. Géotechnique 68(9), pp. 805–819. doi: 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.336.
Mariano, A.J., Chin, T.M. and Özgökmen, T.M. 2003. Stochastic boundary conditions for coastal flow modeling. Geophysical Research Letters 30(9), p. 1457. Available at: http:/doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2003GL016972.
Mohammed, W.W. 2015. Amplitude equation for the stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with random Neumann boundary conditions. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 38(18), pp. 4867–4878. doi: 10.1002/mma.3402.
Nielsen, D.R., Th. Van Genuchten, M. and Biggar, J.W. 1986. Water flow and solute transport processes in the unsaturated zone. Water Resources Research 22(9S), pp. 89S-108S. doi: 10.1029/WR022i09Sp0089S.
Da Prato, G. and Zabczyk, J. 1993. Evolution equations with white-noise boundary conditions. Stochastics and Stochastic Reports 42(3–4), pp. 167–182. Available at: https:/www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17442509308833817.
Da Prato, G. and Zabczyk, J. 1996. Ergodicity for Infinite Dimensional Systems. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511662829.
Rasmussen, C.E. and Williams, C.K.I. 2005. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. The MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001.
Ricketts, E.J., Cleall, P.J., Jefferson, A., Kerfriden, P. and Lyons, P. 2023a. Representation of three-dimensional unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soil through tractable Gaussian random fields. Géotechnique, pp. 1–34. doi: 10.1680/jgeot.22.00316.
Ricketts, E.J., Cleall, P.J., Jefferson, T., Kerfriden, P. and Lyons, P. 2023b. Near-boundary error reduction with an optimized weighted Dirichlet–Neumann boundary condition for stochastic PDE-based Gaussian random field generators. Engineering with Computers. doi: 10.1007/s00366-023-01819-6.
Roininen, L., Huttunen, J.M.J. and Lasanen, S. 2014. Whittle-matérn priors for Bayesian statistical inversion with applications in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems and Imaging 8(2), pp. 561–586. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.561.
Satish, M.G. and Zhu, J. 1992. Stochastic approach for groundwater flow in a semiconfined aquifer subject to random boundary conditions. Advances in Water Resources 15(6), pp. 329–339. doi: 10.1016/0309-1708(92)90001-I.
Shi, L., Yang, J., Cai, S. and Lin, L. 2008. Stochastic Analysis of Groundwater Flow Subject to Random Boundary Conditions. Journal of Hydrodynamics 20(5), pp. 553–560. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60094-3.
Wang, W. and Duan, J. 2007. Homogenized Dynamics of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations with Dynamical Boundary Conditions. Communications in Mathematical Physics 275(1), pp. 163–186. doi: 10.1007/s00220-007-0301-8.
Wang, Z., Wu, L., Harter, T., Lu, J. and Jury, W.A. 2003. A field study of unstable preferential flow during soil water redistribution. Water Resources Research 39(4). Available at: http:/doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2001WR000903.
Xu, S. and Duan, J. 2011. A Taylor expansion approach for solving partial differential equations with random Neumann boundary conditions. Applied Mathematics and Computation 217(23), pp. 9532–9542. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.137.
Zienkiewicz, O.C., Taylor, R.L. and Zhu, J.Z. 2013. The Finite Element Method: its Basis and Fundamentals. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-24909-9.