A Robust Fast Fracture Plane Orientation Angle Search Algorithm for Puck 3D Inter-Fibre Failure Criterion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.3332Keywords:
Composite material, 3D Puck failure criterion, fast fracture plane angle orientation search algorithmAbstract
In the present work, a novel fast fracture plane orientation angle (FPOA) search algorithm for the 3D Puck failure criterion is proposed. In the 3D Puck failure criterion, a linear search algorithm is employed to calculate the maximum inter-fibre failure (IFF) value by iterating and comparing the IFF value for each FPOA. This process itself requires a substantial amount of computational resources. The proposed fast FPOA search algorithm is implemented to substitute the linear search algorithm in order to reduce the computational time. A total of 1×105 randomised stress cases are used to analyse the accuracy of the algorithm. The result was then compared with the Puck Stepwise Seach Method (SSM) and other fast FPOA search algorithms. The results show that the proposed fast FPOA search algorithm has better accuracy compared to the other fast FPOA search algorithms and is almost 5 times faster compared to the SSM algorithm by Puck. In addition, a subroutine contains the Puck failure criterion and the proposed fast FPOA search algorithm is embedded into a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software to simulate the open-hole test (OHT) experiment on the composite material.
Downloads
References
S. W. Tsai and E. M. Wu, “A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 5, pp. 58–80, 1971.
Z. Hashin, “Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 329–334, 1980.
M. J. Hinton, A. S. Kaddour and P. D. Soden, Failure criteria in fibre-reinforced-polymer composites, Elsevier, 2004.
A. Puck, “Festigkeitsanalyse von Faser-Matrix-Laminaten, Modelle für die Praxis,” Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich, 1996.
A. Puck and H. Schürmann, “Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1045–1067, 1998.
A. Puck, J. Kopp and M. Knops, “Guidelines for the determination of the parameters in Puck’s action plane strength criterion,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 371–378, 2002.
Verein Deutscher Ingeniere., “Development of fibre-reinforced plastics components – analysis,” Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, 2006.
J. Weigand, N. Petrinic and B. Elliott, “An algorithm for determination of the fracture angle for the three-dimensional Puck matrix failure criterion for UD composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2511–2517, 2008.
J. Kiefer, “Sequential minimax search for a maximum,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 502–506, 1953.
P. Jarratt, “An iterative method for locating turning points,” The Computer Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82–84, 1967.
F. J. Schirmaier, J. Weiland, L. Kärger and F. Henning, “A new efficient and reliable algorithm to determine the fracture angle for Puck’s 3D matrix failure criterion for UD composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 100, pp. 19–25, 2014.
M. Rezasefat, D. B. Torres, A. Gonzales-Jimenez, M. Giglio and A. Manes, “A fast fracture plane orientation search algorithm for Puck’s 3D IFF criterion for UD composites,” Materials Today Communications, vol. 28, p. 102700, 2021.
B. Paul, “A modification of the Coulomb-Mohr theory of fracture,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 259–268, 1961.
P. P. Camanho, P. Maimí and C. G. Dávila, “Prediction of size effects in notched laminates using continuum damage mechanics,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 2715–2727, 2007.
P. P. Camanho, M. A. Bessa, G. Catalanotti, M. Vogler and R. Rofles, “Modeling the inelastic deformation and fracture of polymer composites – Part II: Smeared crack model,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 59, pp. 36–49, 2013.
P. Maimí, P. P. Camanho, J. A. Mayugo and C. G. Dávila, “A Continuum Damage Model for Composite Laminates: Part I – Constitutive Model,” Mechanics of Material, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 897–908, 2007.
P. Maimí, P. P. Camanho, J. A. Mayugo and C. G. Dávila, “A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part II – Computational implementation and validation,” Mechanics of Material, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 909–919, 2007.
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery, FORTRAN numerical recipes, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
P. D. Soden, M. J. Hinton and A. S. Kaddour, “Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates: failure exercise benchmark data,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1489–1514, 2002.
R.-H. Maa and J.-H. Cheng, “A CDM-based failure model for predicting strength of notched composite laminates,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 479–489, 2002.
A. M. Girão Coelho, J. T. Mottram and K. A. Harries, “Finite element guidelines for simulation of fibre-tension dominated failures in composite materials validated by case studies,” Composite Structures, vol. 126, pp. 299–313, 2015.
J. F. Chen, E. V. Morozov and K. Shankar, “A combined elastoplastic damage model for progressive failure analysis of composite materials and structures,” Composite Structures, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 3478–3489, 2012.
O. Völkerink, E. Petersen, J. Koord and C. Hühne, “A pragmatic approach for a 3D material model considering elasto-plastic behaviour, damage initiation by Puck or Cuntze and progressive failure of fibre-reinforced plastics,” Computers & Structures, vol. 236, p. 106280, 2020.