Statics and inverse dynamics solvers based on strain-mode disassembly

Authors

  • Fran~ois M. Hemez Engineering Sciences and Applications ( ESA-EA) Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, MIS P946, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • Emmanuel Pagnacco Laboratoire de Mecanique de Rouen (LMR) UPRES-A CNRS 6/04 & /NSA de Rouen BP 8, F-76801 Saint Etienne-du-Rouvray

Keywords:

disassembly, finite element method, numerical method, fast reanalysis

Abstract

The finite element method is widely used in design engineering for modeling and analyzing structural systems. Two approaches have been developed: the force-based method that exploits the equilibrium of forces and momellts at nodal joillts of the mesh to formulate the assembly of element-level matrices into master mass and stiffness matrices and its dual counterpart, the flexibility-based method. An alternative formulation of stiffness-based finite element assembly is proposed that decomposes element-level matrices even further into strain mode contributions. This decomposition (referred to as finite element disassembly here) allows the derivation of an efficient numerical solver. It is shown that a single matrix factorization is required for analyzing all models characterized by the same topology. This makes finite element disassembly and the associated inverse solver ideal in cases where multiple design analyzes are performed. In the first part, this publication derives a framework for an alternative finite element assembly of mass and stiffness matrices in the colltext of linear elasticity. Basically, disassembly consists ofrepresentingfinite element matrices as a matrix product where topology contributions are isolated from constitutive law or inertia law contributions. Application examples are discussed to illustrate the advantages and limitations of this formulation using various meshes typically encountered in the automotive and aerospace industries. The second area of application discussed in the second part of this publication is the correlation between finite element models and test data. It is shown that numerical models can be updated for improving their correlation with measured frequency responsefimctions with minimum computational cost when the model is disassembled.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[ARG 60] ARGYRIS, J.H .. and KELSEY, S., Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis, Butterworths,

London, U.K., 1960.

[BAT 92] BATOZ J.L., and DHATT G., Modelisation de Structures par Elhnents finis, Vol. 3,

Hermes Editeur, 1992.

[BAT 96] BATHE K.J., Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, M.I.T. Press, 1996.

[BUS 65] BUSINGER, P.A., and GOLUB, G.H., "Linear Least Squares Solutions by Householder

Transformations," Journal of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 7, 1965, pp. 269-276.

[CAL 83] CALLADINE, C.R., Theory of Shell Structures, Cambridge University Press, New

York, NY, 1983.

[FAR 91] FARHAT, C., and Roux, F.-X., "A Method of Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting

and its Parallel Solution Algorithm," International Journal of Numerical Methods

in Engineering, Vol. 32, 1991, pp. 1205-1227.

[FAR 92] FARHAT, C., and GERADIN, M., "A Hybrid Formulation of a Component Mode

Synthesis Method," 33rd AIAA/ASMEIASCEIAHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics

and Materials Conference,# AIAA-92-2383-CP, Dallas, TX, Apr. 13-15, 1992, pp. 1783-

[FEL 89] FELIPPA, C.A., and MILITELLO, C., "Developments in Variational Methods For

High Performance Plate and Shell Elements," Analytical and Computational Models of

Shells, Edited by Noor, A.K., Belytschko, T., and Simo, J.C., ASME Winter Annual Meeting,

San Francisco, CA. Dec. 10-15, 1989, pp. 191-215.

[FRA 65] FRAEIJS DE VEUBEKE, B.M., "Displacement and Equilibrium Models in the Finite

Element Method," Stress Analysis, Edited by Zienkiewicz, O.C, and Hollister, G., Wiley,

London, U.K., 1965,pp. 145-197.

[GEO 80] GEORGE, J.A .• and HEATH, M.T., "Solution of Sparse Linear Least Squares Problems

Using Givens Rotations," Journal of Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Vol. 34,

, pp. 69-83.

[GER 97] GERADIN, M., and RIXEN, D., Mechanical Vibration, Theory and Application to

Structural Dynamics, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y .. Second Edition, 1997.

[GOL 90] GOLUB, G.H., and VAN LOAN, C.F., Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins

University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, Second Edition, 1990.

[GOR 96] GORDIS, J.H., "On the Analytic Disassembly of Structural Matrices," Modal Analysis:

the International Journal of Analytic and Experimental Modal Analysis, Vol. II, No.

I & 2, July 1996, pp. 39-48.

[HAF 93] HAFTKA, R.T., AND GORDAL, Z., Elements of Struc/1/ra/ Optimization, Solid Mechanics

and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Third Edition, 1993.

[HEM 95] HEMEZ, F.M .. and Farhat, C., "Structural Damage Detection Via a Finite Element

Model Updating Methodology," Journal of Modal Analysis. Vol. I 0, No. 3, July 1995, pp.

-166.

[HEM 98] HEMEZ, F.M., "Can Model Updating Tell the Truth?," 16th SEM International

Modal Analysis Conference. Santa Barbara, CA, Feb. 2-5, 1998, pp. 1-7.

[HUG 87] HUGHES, T.J.R., The Finite Element Method: Linear, Static and Dvnamic Finite

Element Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

[JON 75] JONES, R.M., Mechanics of Composite Materials, Taylor & Francis, 1975.

[MeG 90] McGOWAN, P.E., SMITH, S.W., and JAVEED, M., "Experiments For Locating Damaged

Members in a Truss Structure," 2nd USAF/NASA Workshop on System Identification

and Health Monitoring of Precision Space Structures, Pasadena, CA. Mar. 27-29, 1990, pp.

-615.

[ODE 76] ODEN, J .T., An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Finite Elements, Wiley,

New York, NY, 1976.

[ODE 83] ODEN, J.T., and REDDY, J.N., Variational Methods in Theoretical Mechanics,

Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2nd Edition, 1983.

[PAG 97] PAGNACCO, E., and PARK, K.C., "Damage Location Using a Localized FlexibilityBased

Method," Center for Aerospace Structures, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder,

CO 80309-0429, Nov. 1997.

[PAR 97] PARK, K.C., REICH, G.W., and ALVIN, K.F., "Structural Damage Detection Using

Localized Flexibilities," Center for Aerospace Structures, University of Colorado at Boulder,

Boulder, CO 80309-0429,# CU-CAS-97-14, July 1997.

[PAZ 91] PAZ, M., Structural Dynamics, Theory and Computation, Van Nostrand Reinhold,

New York, NY, Third Edition, 1991.

[PET95] PETERSON, L.D., DOEBLING, S.W., and ALVIN, K.F., "Experimental Determination

of Local Structural Stiffness by Disassembly of Measured Flexibility Matrices,"

th AIAA/ASMEJASCEIAHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference,#

AIAA-95-1090-CP, New Orleans, LA, Apr. 10-13, 1995, pp. 2756-2766.

[RAZ 65] RAZANI R., "Behavior of Fully Stressed Design of Structures and Its Relationship

to Minimum-Weight Design," AIAA Journal, Vol. 3, No. 12, 1965.

[ROZ 89] RoZVANY G.I.N., Structural Design Via Optimilaty Criteria, Kluwer, Dordrecht,

The Netherlands, 1989.

[SOU 95] SOUZA DE CURS I, J.E., and PAGNACCO, E., "Minimum Mass Spare Parts in 2D

Elasticity," Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Edited by Olhoff. N., and Rozvany,

G.I.N., Pergamon Press, 1995, pp. 23 I -236.

[SUZ 91] SUZUKI, K., and KIKUCHI, N., "A Homogenization Method for Shape and Topology

Optimization," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 93, 1991,

pp. 291-318.

Downloads

Published

2000-05-11

How to Cite

Hemez, F. M. ., & Pagnacco, E. . (2000). Statics and inverse dynamics solvers based on strain-mode disassembly. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 9(5), 511–560. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/EJCM/article/view/2885

Issue

Section

Original Article