Formulation and resolution of inverse problems for nonlinear, transient structural dynamics

Authors

  • Fram;ois M. Heme Engineering Analysis Group (ESA-EA) Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, MIS P946 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, U.S.A.
  • Scott W. Doebling Engineering Analysis Group (ESA-EA) Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, MIS P946 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, U.S.A.

Keywords:

Nonlinear, transient dynamics, inverse problem, model updating

Abstract

A general framework is proposed for validating numerical models for nonlinear, transient dynamics. Previous work has focused on nonlinear vibration and several difficulties of formulating and solving inverse problems for nonlinear dynamics have been identified. Among them, we cite the necessity to satisfy continuity of the response when several finite element optimizations are successively carried out and the need to propagate variability throughout the optimization of the model's parameters. Our approach is illustrated using data from a nonlinear vibration testbed and an impact test experiment both conducted at Los Alamos National Laboratory in support of the advanced strategic computing initiative and our code validation and verification program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[ABA 98] Abaqus/Explicit, User's Manual, Version 5.8, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen,

Inc., Pawtucket, Rhode Island, 1998.

[BEA 99] BEARDSLEY P., HEMEz F.M., and DOEBLING S.W., «Updating Nonlinear Finite

Element Models in the Time Domain,>> Structural Monitoring 2000, F.-K. Chang

(Ed.), 2nd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford

University, Stanford, California, Sep. 8-10, 1999, p. 774-783.

[BIS 98] BISHOP, C. M ., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Clarendon Press,

Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, 1998.

[HAS 98] Hasselman, T.K., Anderson, M.C., and Wenshui, G., <

Analysis For Nonlinear Model Correlation, Updating and Uncertainty Evaluation,>> 16th SEM

international Modal Analysis Conference, Santa Barbara, California, Feb. 2-5, 1998, pp. 664-

[HEM 95] Hemez, F.M., and Farhat, C., <

Model Updating Methodology,>> SEM International Journal of Analytical and Experimental

Modal Analysis, Vol. 10, No.3, July 1995, pp. 152-166.

[HEM 99a] Hemez, F.M., and Doebling, S.W., <

Model Updating for Nonlinear, Transient Dynamics," 17th SEM International Modal Analysis

Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, Feb. 8-11, 1999, pp. 1501-1510.

[HEM 99b] Hemez, F.M., and Doebling, S.W., <

Model Updating for Linear Dynamics," 17th SEM International Modal Analysis Conference,

Kissimmee, Florida, Feb. 8-11, 1999, pp. 1545-1555.

[HEM 99c] Hemez, F.M., and Doebling, S.W., <

for Nonlinear, Transient Dynamics,>> Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Special

Issue EUROMECH-401, Inverse Methods in Structural Dynamics, Edited by J.E.

Mottershead, November 1999, submitted.

[IMR 91] Imregun, M., and Visser, W.J., <>

Shock and Vibration Digest, Vol. 23, No. I, 1991, pp. 19-20.

[JAC 77] Jacobs, D.A.H., The State of the Art in Numerical Analysis, Ed., Academic

Press, London, U.K., 1977.

[LIE 92] Lieven, N.A.J., and Ewins, D.J., <

Terminology in Modal Analysis,>> lOth SEM International Modal Analysis Conference, San

Diego, California, Feb. 2-5, 1992, pp. 1414-1419.

[LUT 96] Lutz, M., Programming Python, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., 1996.

[MAT 99] MatlabTM, User's Manual, Version 5.3, The Math Works, Inc., Natick,

Massachusetts, 1999.

[MOO 89] Mook, D.J, <> AIAA

Journal, Vol. 27, No.7, July 1989, pp. 968-974.

[MOT 93] Mottershead, J.E., and Friswell, M.I., <

A Survey,>> Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 162, No.2, 1993, pp. 347-375.

[NES 96] NESSUS, User's Manual, Version 2.3, Southwest Research Institute, San

Antonio, Texas, 1996.

[MOO 89) MooK D.J, <>

AIAA Journal, Vol. 27, No. 7, July 1989, p. 968-974.

[MOT 93) MOTIERSHEAD J.E., and FRISWELL M.l., <

Dynamics: A Survey,>> Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 162, No. 2, 1993,

p. 347-375.

[NES 96) NESSUS, User's Manual, Version 2.3, Southwest Research Institute, San

Antonio, Texas, 1996.

[PAE 99) PAEZ T., HUNTER N., and RED-HORSE J., <

Based on the Method of Surrogate Data,>> 17th SEM International Modal Analysis

Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, Feb. 8-11, 1999, p. 1495-1500.

[PIR 91) PIRANDA J., LALLEMENT G., and COGAN S., <

Element Models By Minimization of an Output Residual: Improvement of the

Sensitivity Method,>> 9th SEM International Modal Analysis Conference, Firenze,

Italy, Jan. 1991.

[ROS 52] ROSENBLATI M., «Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation,>> The Annals of

Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 23, No.3, 1952, p. 470-472.

Downloads

Published

2000-03-29

How to Cite

M. Heme, F. ., & Doebling, S. W. . (2000). Formulation and resolution of inverse problems for nonlinear, transient structural dynamics. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 9(1-3), 173–197. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/EJCM/article/view/2939

Issue

Section

Original Article