Research on Seismic Mechanical Characteristics of Multi-Story Frame Structures in Prefabricated Buildings

Authors

  • Li Jianwei Capital Construction Department, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
  • Zhao Yongquan Capital Construction Department, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
  • Niu Haoshuang School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.34341

Keywords:

Prefabricated buildings, Multilayer frame, Frame structure, Structural seismic resistance, Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

As an important structural form of prefabricated buildings, multi-story frame structures are mainly composed of vertically load-bearing frame columns and horizontally connected beams, featuring good structural stability and strong seismic resistance. Compared with the traditional cast-in-place reinforced concrete frame structure, the core feature of the prefabricated frame lies in that its structural components are prefabricated in the factory and then transported to the site to be assembled into an integral structure through specific connection techniques. This revolutionary change in construction methods, while bringing about improvements in efficiency and quality, has also profoundly altered the force transmission mechanism and failure mode of structures. The key to its seismic performance is largely determined by the performance of the connection nodes between prefabricated components, especially the beam-column nodes. This paper focuses on the seismic mechanical characteristics of multi-story frame structures in prefabricated buildings. Through numerical simulation, the mechanical response features of multi-story frame structures under seismic loads are systematically analyzed. Two different strength grades of concrete show similar trends in bearing capacity and deformation capacity. When the axial compression ratio increases, the bearing capacity and yield displacement of the structure are smaller. When the yield strength of longitudinal reinforcing bars increases, the structure has a higher bearing capacity, initial stiffness and greater yield displacement. It has a stronger adaptability when plastic deformation occurs. Structures with a lower reinforcement ratio have a lower bearing capacity and, as the load increases, the rate at which the bearing capacity decreases is faster.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Li Jianwei, Capital Construction Department, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China

Li Jianwei received his Master of Engineering degree from the Henan Polytechnic University in 2010. He is currently a senior engineer at Henan Polytechnic University. His main research direction is engineering project management.

Zhao Yongquan, Capital Construction Department, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China

Zhao Yongquan received his Master of Engineering degree from Chongqing Jiaotong University in 2017. He is currently an engineer at Henan Polytechnic University. His main research direction is engineering project management.

Niu Haoshuang, School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China

Niu Haoshuang received his Ph.D. in Engineering from Chang’an University in 2022. He is currently a master’s student in the School of Civil Engineering at Henan Polytechnic University. His main research direction is intelligent monitoring and early warning of tunnel disasters and engineering project management.

References

P Zakian and A Kaveh. (2023). Seismic design optimization of engineering structures: a comprehensive review. Acta Mechanica 234(4), 1305–1330.

E P Popov, C E Grigorian and T S Yang. (1995). Developments in seismic structural analysis and design. Engineering Structures 17(3), 187–197.

Y Fan, J Song, X Zhou and H Liu. (2024). Seismic performance evaluation of a frame system strengthened with external self-centering components. Buildings 14(11), 3666.

Y D Aktaş and A Türer. (2016). Seismic performance evaluation of traditional timber Hımış frames: Capacity spectrum method based assessment. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14, 3175–3194.

A Chourasia, S Singhal and Manivannan. (2023). Prefabricated volumetric modular construction: A review on current systems, challenges, and future prospects. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 28(1), 03122009.

T Gunawardena, T Ngo and P Mendis. (2016). Behaviour of multi-storey prefabricated modular buildings under seismic loads. Earthquakes and Structures 11(6), 1061–1076.

W Ferdous, Y Bai, T D Ngo, A Manalo and P Mendis. (2019). New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings–A state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures 183, 883–893.

J Dong, Y Bai, Y Liu, X Cong and C Shen. (2024). Seismic damage assessment of new type prefabricated concrete frame joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 215, 108553.

C J Zhong, R Q Feng, Z Hui and H Y Li. (2024). Experimental, numerical simulation and design methodology of axial compression performance of combined steel columns for modular buildings. Journal of Building Engineering 98, 111439.

G Zhang, Z Wang, W Ma, Z Wang, L Li, Y Zhou, Y Li and Y Suo. (2025). Experimental study on seismic performance of vertical connection nodes of prefabricated concrete channel. Buildings 15(10), 1581.

Q Zheng, S Chen and W Lin. (2024). Numerical study on seismic performance of a new prefabricated reinforced concrete structural system integrated with recoverable energy-dissipating RC walls. Buildings 14(10), 3243.

Z Zhu, F Wu and J Hao. (2023). Mechanical behavior of a novel precast concrete beam–column joint using the mortise–tenon connection. Sustainability 15(19), 14586.

B Zhao, D Wu and H Zhu. (2022). New modular precast composite shear wall structural system and experimental study on its seismic performance. Engineering Structures 264, 114381.

X Hu, W Xue and Y Lv. (2023). Experimental studies on structural performance of precast concrete shear walls with innovative UHPC-based connections. Journal of Building Engineering 73, 106748.

R Chang, N Zhang and Q Gu. (2023). A review on mechanical and structural performances of precast concrete buildings. Buildings 13(7), 1575.

Q Zhou, Y Liu and Y Li. (2022). Load transfer mechanism of precast concrete piers with demountable connections. Engineering Structures 261, 114287.

S Mokhtari and M Hassan. (2024). Performance of bond between old and new concrete layers: The effective factors, durability and measurement tests – a review. Infrastructures 9(10), 171.

H Liu, H Zou, J Zhang, J Zhang, Y Tang, J Zhang, Y Guo and J Xiao. (2024). Interface bonding properties of new and old concrete: A review. Frontiers in Materials 11, 1389785.

S S Surya and R Sajeeb. (2021). A review on the plastic hinge characteristics of beam-column joints in RC moment resisting frames. AIJR Proceedings 52–61.

Y Xiao, M Yu and W Liu. (2024). Finite element analysis of prefabricated semi-rigid concrete beam–column joint with steel connections. Applied Sciences 14(12), 5070.

J H Sørensen, L C Hoang, J F Olesen and G Fischer. (2017). Testing and modeling dowel and catenary action in rebars crossing shear joints in RC. Engineering Structures 145, 234–245.

T Yin, Z Wang, K Zheng and S Lu. (2022). A new method for design of the semi-rigid steel frame—the integration of joint inverse design and structural design. Buildings 12(7), 938.

R P Dhakal and J Su. (2018). Design of transverse reinforcement to avoid premature buckling of main bars. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 47(1), 147–168.

F Mitjana, S Cafieri, F Bugarin, C Gogu and F Castanie. (2019). Optimization of structures under buckling constraints using frame elements. Engineering Optimization 51(1), 140–159.

M Ramirez and G Araya. (2025). Stability analysis of unsteady laminar boundary layers subject to streamwise pressure gradient. Fluids 10(4), 100.

A N T Ihaddoudène, M Saidani and J P Jaspart. (2017). Mechanical model for determining the critical load of plane frames with semi-rigid joints subjected to static loads. Engineering Structures 145, 109–117.

H Çelik and G Ö K H A N ªakar. (2022). Semi-rigid connections in steel structures state-of-the-art report on modelling, analysis and design. Steel and Composite Structures 45(1).

H T Thai and S E Kim. (2015). Second-order distributed plasticity analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Thin-Walled Structures 94, 120–128.

A Saritas and A Koseoglu. (2015). Distributed inelasticity planar frame element with localized semi-rigid connections for nonlinear analysis of steel structures. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 96, 216–231.

A A Y Yahia. (2022). Influence of semi-rigid connections on the behavior and design of steel frames. Doctoral dissertation, Omdurman Islamic University.

C G Chiorean. (2017). Second-order flexibility-based model for nonlinear inelastic analysis of 3D semi-rigid steel frameworks. Engineering Structures 136, 547–579.

J W Shi, Q Q Wu, B Li, Y Liu, W H Cao and H T Wang. (2024). Fatigue bond behavior of FRP-to-concrete joints with various bonding adhesives. Engineering Structures 301, 117311.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Jianwei, L. ., Yongquan, Z. ., & Haoshuang, N. . (2026). Research on Seismic Mechanical Characteristics of Multi-Story Frame Structures in Prefabricated Buildings. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 34(3&4), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.34341

Issue

Section

Data-Driven Modeling and Simulation – Theory, Methods & Applications