A boundary element implementation for fracture mechanics problems using generalised Westergaard stress functions

Authors

  • Ney Augusto Dumont Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, PUC-Rio – Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-3130
  • Elvis Yuri Mamani Universidad Andina del Cusco, Urbanización Ingeniería, Cusco, Perú http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6139-0960
  • Marilene Lobato Cardoso Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, PUC-Rio – Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-0157

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/17797179.2018.1499188

Keywords:

Fracture mechanics, generalised Westergaard functions, boundary elements

Abstract

In the traditional boundary element methods, the numerical modelling of cracks is usually carried out by means of a hypersingular fundamental solution, which involves a 1=r2 kernel for two-dimensional problems. A more natural procedure should make use of fundamental solutions that represent the square root singularity of the gradient field around the crack tip (a Green’s function). Such a representation has been already accomplished in a variationally based framework that also addresses a convenient means of evaluating results at internal points. This paper proposes a procedure for the numerical simulation of two-dimensional problems with a fundamental solution that can be in part or for the whole structure based on generalised Westergaard stress functions. Problems of general topology can be modelled, such as in the case of unbounded and multiply-connected domains. The formulation is naturally applicable to notches and generally curved cracks. It also provides an easy means of evaluating stress intensity factors, when particularly applied to fracture mechanics. The main features of the theory are briefly presented in the paper, together with several validating examples and some convergence assessments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, T. L. (1995). Fracture mechanics: Fundamentals and applications. 2nd edition. C.

R. C. Press. Boca Raton, New York

Ang, W. T., & Telles, J. C. F. (2004). A numerical Green’s function for multiple cracks in

anisotropic bodies. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 49(3), 197–207.

Barenblatt, G. I. (1962).The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture.

In Advances in applied mechanics. VII, 55–129. Academic Press: Amsterdam.

Brebbia, C. A., Telles, J. C. F., & Wrobel, L. C. (1984). Boundary element techniques:

Theory and applications in engineering. Berlin: Prentice Hall.

Brown, W. F., & Strawley, J. E. (1966). Plane strain crack toughness testing of high strength

metallic materials. In ASTM STP 410 (pp. 5). American Society For Testing And

Materials: Philadelphia, PA.

Cardoso, M. L. (2017). A boundary element implementation for fracture mechanics problems

using generalized westergaard stress functions. MSc. thesis (in Portuguese),

Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Crouch, S. L., & Starfield, A. M. (1983). Boundary element methods in solid mechanics.

London: George Allen & Unwin.

Dugdale, D. S. (1960). Yielding in steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and

Physics of Solids, 8, 100–104.

Dumont, N. A. (1989). The hybrid boundary element method: An alliance between

mechanical consistency and simplicity. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 42(11–2), S54–

S63.

Dumont, N. A. (1994). On the efficient numerical evaluation of integrals with complex

singularity poles. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 13, 155–168.

Dumont, N. A. (2014). The hypersingular boundary element method revisited. In C. A.

Brebbia & A. H.-D. Cheng (eds), Boundary elements and other mesh reduction methods

XXXVII, WIT transactions on modelling and simulation (Vol. 57, pp. 27–39).

Dumont, N. A. (2018). The collocation boundary element method revisited: Perfect code

for 2D poblems. International Journal Comparative Meth and Experiments

Measurement, 6(6), 965–975.

Dumont, N. A., & Aguilar, C. A. (2012). The best of two worlds: The expedite boundary

element method. Engineering Structures, 43, 235–244.

N. A. DUMONT ET AL.

Dumont, N. A., Chaves, R. P., & Paulino, G. H. (2004). The hybrid boundary element

method applied to problems of potential of functionally graded materials. International

Journal of Computational Engineering Science (IJCES), 5(4), 863–891.

Dumont, N. A., & De Oliveira, R. (2001). From frequency-dependent mass and stiffness

matrices to the dynamic response of elastic systems. International Journal of Solids and

Structures, 38(10–13), 1813–1830.

Dumont, N. A., & Huaman, D. (2009). Hybrid finite/boundary element formulation for

strain gradient elasticity problems. In E. J. Sapountzakis & M. H. Aliabadi, eds.,

Advances in Boundary Element Techniques X, Proceedings of the 10th International

Conference, pp. 295–300, EC, Ltd., UK.

Dumont, N. A., & Lopes, A. A. O. (2003). On the explicit evaluation of stress intensity

factors in the hybrid boundary element method. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering

Materials & Structures, 26, 151–165.

Dumont, N. A., & Mamani, E. Y. (2011a). Use of generalized Westergaard stress functions

as fundamental solutions. In E. L. Albuquerque & M. H. Aliabadi (eds), Advances in

boundary element techniques XII (pp. 170–175). UK: EC, Ltd.

Dumont, N. A., & Mamani, E. Y. (2011b). Generalized Westergaard stress functions as

fundamental solutions. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 78(2), 109–150.

Dumont, N. A., & Mamani, E. Y. (2013). Simulation of plastic zone propagation around

crack tips using the hybrid boundary element method. In Z. J. G. N. Del Prado ed,

CILAMCE – XXXIV iberian latin-american congress on computational methods in

engineering 20 pp on CD. Pirenópolis, Brazil

Dumont, N. A., Mamani, E. Y., & Cardoso, M. L. (2017). A boundary element implementation

for fracture mechanics problems using generalized Westergaard stress functions.

In L. Marin & M. H. Aliabadi (eds), Advances in boundary element & meshless

techniques XVIII (pp. 120–125). UK: LC, Ltd.

Eftis, J., & Liebowitz, H. (1972). On the modified Westergaard equations for certain plane

crack problems. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, 8(4), 383–392.

Gupta, M., Alderliesten, R. C., & Benedictus, R. (2015). A review of T-stress and its effects

in fracture mechanics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 134, 218–241.

Harmain, G. A., & Provan, J. W. (1997). Fatigue crack-tip plasticity revisited – The issue of

shape addressed. Theory and Application Fracture Mechanics, 26, 63–79.

Irwin, G. R. (1957). Analysis of stresses and strain near the end of a crack traversing a

plate. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 24, 361–364.

Jing, P., Khraishi, T., & Gorbatikh, L. (2003). Closed-form solutions for the mode II crack

tip plastic zone shape. International Journal of Fracture, 122, 137–142.

Lopes, A. A. O. (1998). The hybrid boundary element method applied to fracture mechanics

problems. MSc. thesis (in Portuguese), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro,

Brazil.

Lopes, A. A. O. (2002). Evaluation of stress intensity factors with the hybrid boundary

element method. PhD. thesis (in Portuguese), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de

Janeiro, Brazil.

Mamani, E. Y. (2011). The hybrid boundary element method based on generalized

Westergaard stress functions. MSc. thesis (in Portuguese), Pontifical Catholic

University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Mamani, E. Y. (2015). Crack modeling using generalized Westergaard stress functions in the

hybrid boundary element method. PhD. thesis (in Portuguese), Pontifical Catholic

University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Mamani, E. Y., & Dumont, N. A. (2015). Use of improved Westergaard stress functions to

adequately simulate the stress field around crack tips. In N. A. Dumont ed, CILAMCE –

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS 423

XXXVI iberian latin-american congress on computational methods in engineering (17).

ISSN: 2178-4949. doi:10.20906/CPS/CILAMCE2015-0840http://www.swge.inf.br/pro

ceedings/CILAMCE2015/ Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Pian, T. H. H. (1964). Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed stress distribution.

AIAA Journal, 2, 1333–1336.

Sneddon, I. N. (1946). The distribution of stress in the neighborhood of a crack in an

elastic solid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 187, 229–260.

Sousa, R. A., Castro, J. T. P., Lopes, A. A. O., & Martha, L. F. (2013). On improved crack

tip plastic zone estimates based on t-stress and on complete stress fields. Fatigue &

Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 36(1), 25–38.

Tada, H., Ernst, H., & Paris, P. (1993). Westergaard stress functions for displacementprescribed

crack problems - I. International Journal of Fracture, 61, 39–53.

Tada, H., Ernst, H., & Paris, P. (1994). Westergaard stress functions for displacementprescribed

crack problems - II. International Journal of Fracture, 67, 151–167.

Telles, J. C. F., Castor, G. S., & Guimares, S. (1995). A numerical Green’s function

approach for boundary elements applied to fracture mechanics. International Journal

for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 38, 3259–3274.

Westergaard, H. M. (1939). Bearing pressures and cracks. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 6,

–53.

Williams, M. L. (1957). On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. Journal

of Applied Mechanics, 24, 109–114.

Xin, G., Hangong, W., Xingwu, K., & Liangzhou, J. (2010). Analytic solutions to crack tip

plastic zone under various loading conditions. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids,

, 738–745.

Zhang, Y., Qiang, H., & Yang, Y. (2007). Unified solutions to mixed mode crack tip under

small scale yielding. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 43(2), 50–54

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

How to Cite

Dumont, N. A., Mamani, E. Y., & Cardoso, M. L. (2018). A boundary element implementation for fracture mechanics problems using generalised Westergaard stress functions. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 27(5-6), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.13052/17797179.2018.1499188

Issue

Section

Original Article