A new strategy for the relative movement of rough surfaces in contact using a boundary element method

Authors

  • Ali Ghanbarzadeh School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • Mark Wilson School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • Ardian Morina School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • Anne Neville School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Keywords:

Contact mechanics, boundary element method, roughness, influence matrix

Abstract

Contact mechanics of rough surfaces is becoming increasingly important in understanding the real behaviours of machine elements in contact. Due to the complicated physical, chemical and mechanical phenomena occurring at surfaces, especially in boundary lubrication, a multiphysics numerical model is essential to capture the behaviour. Boundary Element Method is a well-known numerical approach to model such a problem because of several advantages. Firstly, it is far faster than Finite Element Method since only the boundaries of the solids are discretised. In addition, there is no problem of remeshing the contacting bodies due to plastic deformation and wear. Conventional Boundary Element models simulate movement of contacting surfaces by shifting matrices of numbers in one direction. In this new proposed approach, the big matrices of surfaces are cut into small matrices which indicate the part of surfaces that are in contact. The influence matrix is also cut into a smaller square matrix corresponding to the size of surface matrices. This approach enables matrix implications in smaller sizes than the original big surfaces and reduces the computational time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almqvist, A., Sahlin, F., Larsson, R., & Glavatskih, S. (2007). On the dry elasto-plastic contact

of nominally flat surfaces. Tribology International, 40, 574–579.

Andersson, T. (1981). The boundary element method applied to two-dimensional contact

problems with friction. In Boundary element methods. (pp. 239–258). Heidelberg: Springer.

Andersson, J., Almqvist, A., & Larsson, R. (2011). Numerical simulation of a wear experiment.

Wear, 271, 2947–2952.

Andersson, Joel, Larsson, Roland, Almqvist, Andreas, Grahnb M., & Minami, I. (2012). Semideterministic

chemo-mechanical model of boundary lubrication. Faraday Discussions, 156,

–360.

Bhushan, B. (1998). Contact mechanics of rough surfaces in tribology: Multiple asperity

contact. Tribology Letters, 4(1), 1–35.

Borri-Brunetto, M., Chiaia, B., & Ciavarella, M. (2001). Incipient sliding of rough surfaces

in contact: A multiscale numerical analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and

Engineering, 190, 6053–6073.

Bortoleto, E. M., Rovani, A. C., Seriacopi, V., Profito, F. J., Zachariadis, D. C., Machado, I. F.,

… Souza, R. M. (2012). Experimental and numerical analysis of dry contact in the pin on

disc test. Wear, 301, 19–26.

Bosman, R., & Schipper, D. J. (2011a). Mild wear prediction of boundary-lubricated contacts.

Tribology Letters, 42, 169–178.

Bosman, R., & Schipper, D. J. (2011b). Running-in of systems protected by additive-rich oils.

Tribology Letters, 41, 263–282.

Conry, T. F., & Seireg, A. (1971). A mathematical programming method for design of elastic

bodies in contact. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 38, 387–392.

Ezawa, Y., & Okamoto, N. (1995). Development of contact stress analysis programs using the

hybrid method of FEM and BEM. Computers & structures, 57, 691–698.

Ghanbarzadeh, A., Parsaeian, P., Morina, A., Wilson, M. C., van Eijk, M. C., Nedelcu, I., …

Neville, A. (2016). A semi-deterministic wear model considering the effect of zinc dialkyl

dithiophosphate tribofilm. Tribology Letters, 61(1), 1–15.

Ghanbarzadeh, A., Piras, E., Nedelcu, I., Brizmer, V., Wilson, M. C. T., Morina, A., …

Neville, A. (2016). Zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate antiwear tribofilm and its effect on the

topography evolution of surfaces: A numerical and experimental study. Wear. doi:10.1016/j.

wear.2016.06.004

Ghanbarzadeh, A., Wilson, M., Morina, A., Dowson, D., & Neville, A. (2016). Development

of a new mechano-chemical model in boundary lubrication. Tribology International, 93,

–582.

Greenwood, J. A., & Williamson, J. B. P. (1966). Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings

of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 295, 300–319.

Hegadekatte, V. Hilgert, J. Kraft, O., & Huber, N. (2010). Multi time scale simulations for wear

prediction in micro-gears. Wear, 268, 316–324.

Hertz, H. (1881). On the contact of elastic solids. Journal für die reine und angewandte

Mathematik, 92, 156–171.Ilincic, S., Tungkunagorn, N., Vernes, A., Vorlaufer, G., Fotiu, P., & Franek, F. (2011). Finite

and boundary element method contact mechanics on rough, artificial hip joints. Proceedings

of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 225,

–1091.

Ilincic, S., Vernes, A., Vorlaufer, G., Hunger, H., Dorr, N., & Franek, F. (2013). Numerical

estimation of wear in reciprocating tribological experiments. Proceedings of the Institution

of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 227, 510–519.

Ilincic, S., Vorlaufer, G., Fotiu, P., Vernes, A., & Franek, F. (2009). Combined finite elementboundary

element method modelling of elastic multi-asperity contacts. Proceedings of the

Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 223, 767–776.

Johnson, K. L. (1987) Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kalker, J., & Van Randen, Y. (1972). A minimum principle for frictionless elastic contact

with application to non-Hertzian half-space contact problems. Journal of Engineering

Mathematics, 6, 193–206.

Kosior, F., Guyot, N., & Maurice, G. (1999). Analysis of frictional contact problem using

boundary element method and domain decomposition method. International Journal for

Numerical Methods in Engineering, 46, 65–82.

Lai, W., & Cheng, H. (1985). Computer simulation of elastic rough contacts. ASLE Transactions,

, 172–180.

Landenberger, A., & El-Zafrany, A. (1999). Boundary element analysis of elastic contact

problems using gap finite elements. Computers & structures, 71, 651–661.

Liu, G., Zhu, J., Yu, L., & Wang, Q. J. (2001). Elasto-plastic contact of rough surfaces. Tribology

Transactions, 44, 437–443.

Man, K., Aliabadi, M., & Rooke, D. (1993a). BEM frictional contact analysis: Load incremental

technique. Computers & structures, 47, 893–905.

Man, K., Aliabadi, M., & Rooke, D. (1993b). BEM frictional contact analysis: Modelling

considerations. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 11, 77–85.

Morales-Espejel, G. E., & Brizmer, V. (2011). Micropitting modelling in rolling–sliding contacts:

Application to rolling bearings. Tribology Transactions, 54, 625–643.

Olukoko, O., Becker, A., & Fenner, R. (1993). A new boundary element approach for contact

problems with friction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 36,

–2642.

Öqvist, M. (2001). Numerical simulations of mild wear using updated geometry with different

step size approaches. Wear, 249, 6–11.

Oysu, C., & Fenner, R. (1998). Two-dimensional elastic contact analysis by coupling finite

element and boundary element methods. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering

Design, 33, 459–468.

Poon, C., & Sayles, R. (1994). Numerical contact model of a smooth ball on an anisotropic

rough surface. Journal of Tribology, 116, 194–201.

Ren, N., & Lee, S. C. (1993). Contact simulation of three-dimensional rough surfaces using

moving grid method. Journal of Tribology, 115, 597–601.

Sahlin, F., Larsson, R., Almqvist, A., Lugt, P. M., & Marklund, P. (2009). A mixed lubrication

model incorporating measured surface topography. Part 1: Theory of flow factors. Proceedings

of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 224,

–351.

Sellgren, U., Björklund, S., & Andersson, S. (2003). A finite element-based model of normal

contact between rough surfaces. Wear, 254, 1180–1188.

Sfantos, G. K., & Aliabadi, M. H. (2006a). Application of BEM and optimization technique to

wear problems. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43, 3626–3642.Sfantos, G. K., & Aliabadi, M. H. (2006b). Wear simulation using an incremental sliding

boundary element method. Wear, 260, 1119–1128.

Sfantos, G., & Aliabadi, M. H. (2007). A boundary element formulation for three-dimensional

sliding wear simulation. Wear, 262, 672–683.

Thomson, R. A., & Bocchi, W. (1972). A model for asperity load sharing in lubricated contacts.

ASLE Transactions, 15, 67–79.

Tonder, Y. Z., & Hu, K. (1992). Simulation of 3-D random rough surface by 2-D digital filter

and Fourier analysis. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 32, 83–90.

Tian, Xuefeng, & Bhushan, Bharat. (1996). A numerical three-dimensional model for the

contact of rough surfaces by variational principle. Journal of Tribology, 118, 33–42.

Webster, M., & Sayles, R. (1986). A numerical model for the elastic frictionless contact of real

rough surfaces. Journal of Tribology, 108, 314–320.

Willner, K. (2008). Fully coupled frictional contact using elastic halfspace theory. Journal of

Tribology, 130, 031405.

Yamazaki, K., Sakamoto, J., & Takumi, S. (1994). Penalty method for three-dimensional elastic

contact problems by boundary element method. Computers & structures, 52, 895–903.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Ghanbarzadeh, A., Wilson, M., Morina, A., & Neville, A. (2016). A new strategy for the relative movement of rough surfaces in contact using a boundary element method. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 25(4), 309–328. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/EJCM/article/view/813

Issue

Section

Original Article